Fault-Tolerant Encoding of Logical Qudits in Spin Systems

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2511.06620
• Title: Fault-Tolerant Encoding of Logical Qudits in Spin Systems
• Author: Sumin Lim (KAIST & University of Oxford)
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: November 11, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06620

Abstract

This paper proposes a universal framework for implementing fault-tolerant logical qudit encoding in spin systems. The research demonstrates that distance-3 (or distance-5) encoding of d-dimensional logical qudits can be realized within a 12d-dimensional (or 40d-dimensional) Hilbert space, with generalization to 2t+1 distance codes and multi-physical qudit encoding. Quantitative comparisons show that this encoding strategy provides exponential resource advantages compared to multi-level schemes derived from logical qubit mappings.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Problem to be Solved

• Central Challenge: How to implement fault-tolerant logical qudit encoding in finite-dimensional multi-level physical systems
• Practical Need: When quantum simulating multi-level physical systems, qudits are more natural than qubits, but efficient fault-tolerant encoding schemes are lacking

2. Importance of the Problem

• Quantum Simulation: Universal quantum computers need to simulate arbitrary quantum states governed by Hamiltonians; multi-level systems are intrinsic features of physical systems
• Computational Advantage: Qudits compared to qubits can provide exponential improvements in storage capacity and computational speed
• NISQ Era Requirements: The current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era urgently requires fault-tolerant encoding strategies

3. Limitations of Existing Methods

• GKP Codes: Require bosonic systems (infinite-dimensional Hilbert space), additional normalization procedures, and experimental complexity
• Qubit Mapping Schemes: Mapping qudits to multiple logical qubits requires additional physical qubits and circuit depth, with exponentially growing resource consumption
• Lack of Universal Framework: Existing research lacks systematic fault-tolerant encoding schemes for finite-dimensional spin systems

4. Research Motivation

• Spin systems (electron and nuclear spins) are among the most coherent and stable quantum systems
• Nuclear spins are ideal candidates for fault-tolerant quantum storage
• Large Hilbert spaces can be achieved through chemical design of giant molecular magnets or trapped laser-cooled atoms/molecules

Core Contributions

1. Universal Encoding Framework: Proposes a general method for encoding logical qudits in spin qudit systems, applicable to arbitrary dimensions d and arbitrary code distances 2t+1
2. Resource-Efficient Design:
   • Distance-3 d-dimensional logical qudit requires only 12d-dimensional Hilbert space
   • Distance-5 encoding requires 40d-dimensional space
   • Achieves exponential resource savings compared to qubit mapping schemes
3. Hierarchical Error Correction Capability:
   • Z-error (phase error) correction codes
   • Complete Pauli X/Y/Z error correction codes
   • Extensible to higher-order error correction
4. Multiple Implementation Schemes:
   • Single large spin qudit encoding
   • Entangled encoding of multiple coupled spin qudits
   • Complete encoding/decoding pulse sequences provided
5. Quantitative Performance Analysis: Systematically compares required Hilbert space dimensions, gate complexity, and minimum single-qudit gate fidelity thresholds

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Input: d-dimensional logical qudit state $|\psi\rangle = \sum_{i=0}^{d-1} \alpha_i |i\rangle$

Output: Encoded fault-tolerant logical state $|\psi_{enc}\rangle = \sum_{i=0}^{d-1} \alpha_i |i_L\rangle$, capable of correcting quantum errors of specific orders

Constraints:

• Satisfy Knill-Laflamme (KL) criterion
• Use finite-dimensional Hilbert space
• Polynomial-level gate complexity

Model Architecture

1. Z-Error Correction Code (Distance-3)

Qutrit Encoding Example (using spin-9/2 system):

$|0_L\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{10}{20}}\left(|-\frac{5}{2}\rangle + |+\frac{5}{2}\rangle\right)$

$|1_L\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{6}{20}}\left(|-\frac{3}{2}\rangle + |+\frac{3}{2}\rangle\right) + \sqrt{\frac{4}{20}}\left(|-\frac{7}{2}\rangle + |+\frac{7}{2}\rangle\right)$

$|2_L\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{7}{20}}\left(|-\frac{1}{2}\rangle + |+\frac{1}{2}\rangle\right) + \sqrt{\frac{3}{20}}\left(|-\frac{9}{2}\rangle + |+\frac{9}{2}\rangle\right)$

General Formula (d-dimensional qudit):

$|0_L\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}(|-(S/2+1/4)\rangle + |+(S/2+1/4)\rangle)$

$|i_L\rangle = a_i(|-(S/2+1/4-i)\rangle + |+(S/2+1/4-i)\rangle) + b_i(|-(S/2+1/4+i)\rangle + |+(S/2+1/4+i)\rangle)$

where $S = 2d - 3/2$, and coefficients are:

$a_i = \sqrt{\frac{2d-1+i}{8d-4}}, \quad b_i = \sqrt{\frac{2d-1-i}{8d-4}}$

2. Knill-Laflamme Criterion Verification

Codewords must satisfy: $\langle i_L|E_a^\dagger E_b|j_L\rangle = 0, \quad (i \neq j)$$\langle i_L|E_a^\dagger E_b|i_L\rangle - \langle j_L|E_a^\dagger E_b|j_L\rangle = 0$

For Z-errors, error operators are $E \in \{I, S_Z\}$. Due to the symmetric construction of codewords, all original codewords and error codewords are mutually orthogonal, forming a pure error-correcting code.

3. Distance-5 Encoding (Second-Order Error Correction)

Qutrit Example (spin-19/2 system):

$|0_L\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{5}{16}}\left(|-\frac{5}{2}\rangle + |+\frac{5}{2}\rangle\right) + \sqrt{\frac{3}{16}}\left(|-\frac{15}{2}\rangle + |+\frac{15}{2}\rangle\right)$

Contains 4 basis state components, must satisfy KL criterion up to $\langle i_L|S_Z^n|i_L\rangle = \langle j_L|S_Z^n|j_L\rangle$ (n=0,1,2,3,4).

4. Complete X/Y/Z Error Correction

Achieved by expanding basis state indices by factor 2t+1:

• Distance-3: Extended from 9/2 to 29/2 (3× spacing)
• Distance-5: Extended from 19/2 to 99/2 (5× spacing)

Key Insight: Identical coefficients can be used for X/Y/Z error correction because: $\langle i_L|S_X^2|i_L\rangle = 2S(S+1) - 2\langle i_L|S_Z^2|i_L\rangle$

Spacing design ensures orthogonality after X/Y operator action.

5. Multi-Qudit Entangled Encoding

Qutrit encoding with three spin-9/2 systems:

$|0_L\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{10}{20}}\left(|-\frac{5}{2}\rangle_{A,B,C} + |+\frac{5}{2}\rangle_{A,B,C}\right)$

where $|m_I\rangle_{A,B,C} = |m_I\rangle_A \otimes |m_I\rangle_B \otimes |m_I\rangle_C$

Technical Innovations

1. Symmetry-Driven Coefficient Design

• Exploits symmetric distribution of spin states to automatically satisfy odd-order KL conditions
• Only requires coefficient adjustment to satisfy even-order conditions, greatly simplifying design

2. Hierarchical Extension Strategy

• Z-error → X/Y/Z-error: Basis state spacing expanded by factor 2t+1
• Distance-3 → Distance-5: Hilbert space doubled, new basis state components added
• Coefficients reusable, modular design

3. Pure Error-Correcting Code Property

• All codewords and error codewords completely orthogonal
• Encoding/decoding implementable with simple pulse sequences (see Appendix A)
• No complex syndrome measurement required

4. Polynomial Resource Scaling

• Hilbert space: $O(d \cdot (2t+1)^2)$
• Gate complexity: Polynomial level
• Contrasts with exponential scaling of qubit schemes

Experimental Setup

Numerical Simulation Parameters

1. Decoherence Model

Lindblad master equation simulates natural dephasing: $\dot{\rho} = -i[H, \rho] + \mathcal{L}[\rho]$

Error probability: $\epsilon_Z = t/T_2$ (assuming $t \ll T_2$)

2. Gate Fidelity Model

Test parameters:

• Single-gate fidelity: 99.5%, 99.9%
• Gate time ratio: $t_{gate}/T_2 = 10^{-4}, 10^{-3}$
• Rotation angle error: $10^{-3}, 5 \times 10^{-3}$

3. Initial State Setup

Qutrit superposition state: $|\psi\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(|0_L\rangle + |1_L\rangle + |2_L\rangle)$

Evaluation Metrics

1. Fidelity: $F = \langle\psi|\rho|\psi\rangle$
2. Error Rate: $E = 1 - F^2$
3. Gain: $G = E_{uncorrected}/E_{corrected}$
4. Hilbert Space Dimension: Total dimension required for encoding
5. Gate Complexity: Number of gate operations for encoding/decoding

Comparison Methods

Traditional Qubit Mapping Scheme:

• Uses distance-3 surface code to construct logical qubits
• Maps d-dimensional qudit to $\lceil\log_2 d\rceil$ logical qubits
• Each logical qubit requires 9 physical qubits (distance-3 surface code)

Implementation Details

Encoding Pulse Sequence (Qutrit Z-Error)

• Initial state: $|\psi\rangle = \alpha|-\frac{9}{2}\rangle + \beta|-\frac{7}{2}\rangle + \gamma|-\frac{5}{2}\rangle$
• Uses selective rotation gates $U_{\theta_i}$ (around y-axis), with angles satisfying:
  • $\cos(\theta_1) = \sqrt{1/2}$
  • $\cos(\theta_2) = \sqrt{3/10}$
  • $\cos(\theta_3) = \sqrt{3/7}$
  • $\cos(\theta_4) = \sqrt{7/20}$
  • $\cos(\theta_5) = \sqrt{7/13}$

Decoding and Error Correction

• Apply inverse encoding pulses
• Conditional excitation of auxiliary qubit
• Projective measurement of auxiliary qubit to recover original state

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Hilbert Space Comparison (Figure 2a)

Conclusion: This work's Hilbert space requirement grows polynomially as $O(12d)$, while qubit schemes grow exponentially as $O(9 \cdot 2^{\lceil\log_2 d\rceil})$

2. Code Distance Extension Comparison (Figure 2b)

3. Fidelity Evolution (Figure 1b)

• Without Error Correction: Fidelity decays linearly, $F \approx 1 - t/T_2$
• Distance-3 Correction: Residual error $\propto (t/T_2)^2$
• Distance-5 Correction: Residual error $\propto (t/T_2)^3$

Gain (inset):

• At $t/T_2 = 0.1$:
  • Distance-3: Gain ~10×
  • Distance-5: Gain ~100×

4. Practical Gate Fidelity Requirements (Figure 3)

Critical Thresholds:

• Optimal Conditions: Single-gate fidelity > 99.9%, $t_{gate}/T_2 < 10^{-4}$
• Sub-optimal Conditions: Fidelity 99.5% or $t_{gate}/T_2 = 10^{-3}$ significantly reduces error correction advantage

Specific Data ($t/T_2 = 0.1$):

• Ideal error correction: $F = 0.95$
• $t_{gate}/T_2 = 10^{-4}$, rotation error $10^{-3}$: $F = 0.92$
• $t_{gate}/T_2 = 10^{-3}$, rotation error $10^{-3}$: $F = 0.75$

Ablation Studies

While not explicitly labeled as "ablation studies," the paper conducts systematic component analysis:

1. Code Distance Impact

• Distance-1 (no correction) vs Distance-3 vs Distance-5
• Higher code distances provide stronger error correction but require larger Hilbert spaces

2. Single Qudit vs Multi-Qudit Encoding

• Single large spin (e.g., S=9/2)
• Three small spins (three S=9/2)
• Multi-qudit schemes more feasible on solid-state platforms (nuclear spins)

3. Z-Error vs Complete Pauli Correction

• Z-error: Suitable for solid-state spins (primary dephasing)
• X/Y/Z-error: Requires 3× Hilbert space

Experimental Findings

1. Exponential Resource Advantage: Hilbert space requirements reduced by 6-14 orders of magnitude compared to qubit mapping
2. Decoding Complexity Advantage: Total Hilbert space dimension provides upper bound on decoding task complexity; this work dramatically reduces decoding complexity
3. Gate Complexity Reduction:
   • Error correction process: Single-qudit encoding requires no multi-qudit gates
   • Algorithm implementation: Direct qudit gates vs decomposition to multiple qubit gates
4. Non-Uniqueness of Coefficients: Distance-5 codes admit multiple valid coefficient sets (Appendix B), suggesting further optimization space
5. Platform Flexibility:
   • Solid-state systems: Bi-doped Si (nuclear spins)
   • Molecular magnets: Giant molecular magnets (large spins)
   • Atomic systems: Trapped cold atoms (angular momentum)

Related Work

1. Logical Qubit Error Correction Codes

• Surface Codes 28: Current mainstream approach, but high resource requirements
• Knill-Laflamme Theory 27: Theoretical foundation of this work
• Perfect Quantum Error-Correcting Codes 26: Theoretical framework

2. Qudit Error-Correcting Codes

• GKP Codes 29: Bosonic systems, require infinite-dimensional space
• Binomial Codes 20,51,52: One inspiration source for this work
• Cat Codes 49,50: Continuous variable systems
• SU(d) Irreducible Representation Codes 18: Group-theoretic approach
• Permutation-Invariant Codes 21: Symmetry exploitation

3. Quantum Computing in Spin Systems

• Early NMR Experiments 2,4,5: Demonstrated feasibility of spin systems
• Spin-7/2 Qubit Encoding 13: Authors' prior work
• Molecular Nanomagnets 38,39: Embedded error correction
• High-Spin Donors 42: Navigation of 16-dimensional Hilbert space

4. Qudit Quantum Algorithms

• Resource-Efficient Simulation 16: Simulation of d-level systems
• Circuit Compression 15: Role of entanglement in qudit circuits
• Grover's Algorithm 59: Qudit implementation requires additional resources

Advantages of This Work

1. Universality: Applicable to arbitrary d and arbitrary code distances 2t+1
2. Finite-Dimensional: No need for infinite-dimensional bosonic systems
3. Experimentally Feasible: Provides complete pulse sequences, compatible with existing platforms
4. Resource Efficiency: Achieves exponential savings compared to all existing schemes

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical Contribution: Establishes complete theoretical framework for logical qudit encoding in finite-dimensional spin systems, proving that d-dimensional logical qudits can be realized within 12d-dimensional (distance-3) or 40d-dimensional (distance-5) spaces
2. Resource Advantage: Hilbert space requirements reduced by 6-14 orders of magnitude compared to traditional qubit mapping schemes, achieving exponential resource savings
3. Practicality: Provides complete encoding/decoding pulse sequence designs implementable on existing spin platforms (nuclear spins, molecular magnets, trapped atoms)
4. Performance Requirements: Numerical simulations indicate that single-gate fidelity > 99.9% and $t_{gate}/T_2 < 10^{-4}$ are necessary for significant error correction advantages

Limitations

1. Experimental Barriers

• High Fidelity Requirements: 99.9% single-gate fidelity is challenging in current spin systems
• Fast Gate Operations: $t_{gate}/T_2 < 10^{-4}$ requires extremely fast gates or very long coherence times

2. Large Hilbert Space Implementation

• High-Dimensional Spins: Distance-5 complete Pauli correction requires S=99/2 (100-dimensional space)
• Platform Limitations:
  • Nuclear spins typically $I \leq 9/2$
  • Requires specially designed molecular magnets or trapped atom systems

3. Theoretical Completeness

• Optimality Not Proven: Acknowledges coefficient non-uniqueness but lacks mathematical proof of minimum dimension
• High-Order Code Distances: Analytic solutions for $t \geq 3$ not provided, only construction strategies

4. Missing Experimental Verification

• All results based on numerical simulations
• Lacks experimental demonstration data
• Does not discuss implementation details for specific platforms (e.g., control Hamiltonian design)

5. Simplified Noise Model

• Primarily considers dephasing (Z-error)
• Insufficient discussion of amplitude damping, leakage, and other noise
• Lindblad model may be overly idealized

Future Directions

1. Experimental Implementation: Proof-of-concept experiments on Bi-doped Si or molecular magnet platforms
2. Design Optimization:
   • Find mathematical proof of minimum Hilbert space dimension
   • Develop coefficient optimization algorithms (considering experimental constraints)
3. Fault-Tolerant Gate Operations: Design fault-tolerant implementation schemes for logical qudit gates
4. Noise-Adaptive Encoding: Optimize codeword design for different noise models (e.g., amplitude damping)
5. Scalable Architecture: Study entanglement and gate operations in multi-logical-qudit systems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

• High Originality: First systematic proposal of universal logical qudit encoding framework for finite-dimensional spin systems
• Mathematical Rigor: Complete KL criterion verification with analytic coefficient formulas
• Extensibility: Clear extension paths from Z-error to X/Y/Z-error, from distance-3 to arbitrary distances

2. Practical Value (⭐⭐⭐⭐)

• Resource Efficiency: Exponential resource savings have major practical significance
• Platform Flexibility: Compatible with multiple physical implementations (solid-state, molecular, atomic)
• Simple Operations: Pure error-correcting code design yields concise encoding/decoding pulse sequences

3. Analysis Comprehensiveness (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

• Quantitative Comparison: Systematic comparison of Hilbert space, gate complexity, fidelity requirements
• Multi-Level Design: Complete coverage of Z-error, X/Y/Z-error, different code distances
• Practical Considerations: Accounts for gate errors and decoherence impact on performance

4. Writing Clarity (⭐⭐⭐⭐)

• Clear logical structure: From simple examples to general framework
• Accurate mathematical exposition: Detailed formula derivations (appendices)
• Effective figures: Intuitive resource comparison and performance gain visualization

Weaknesses

1. Experimental Feasibility Questionable (⭐⭐)

• High Fidelity Threshold: 99.9% fidelity extremely challenging in spin systems
• Large Space Requirements: S=99/2 physical implementation very difficult
• Lacks Specific Control Schemes: No concrete Hamiltonian design for implementing encoding pulses

2. Theoretical Incompleteness (⭐⭐⭐)

• Optimality Unproven: Acknowledges more compact encodings exist but provides no proof
• High-Order Code Distance Deficiency: General formulas for $t \geq 3$ missing
• Single Noise Model: Primarily addresses dephasing; other noise types insufficiently discussed

3. Unfair Comparisons (⭐⭐⭐)

• Qubit Scheme: Using surface codes as baseline may not represent optimal qubit-to-qudit mapping
• GKP Codes: Lacks detailed comparison with continuous-variable GKP codes
• Gate Complexity: Single-qudit high-dimensional rotation actual complexity possibly underestimated

4. Missing Experimental Data (⭐⭐)

• Entirely dependent on numerical simulations
• No experimental verification cited (even small-scale proof-of-concept)
• Insufficient analysis of experimental error sources

Impact Assessment

Contribution to Field (⭐⭐⭐⭐)

• Theoretical Breakthrough: Provides new paradigm for quantum error correction community
• Resource Efficiency: May reshape future quantum processor architecture design
• Cross-Disciplinary Connection: Bridges quantum error correction, spin physics, quantum simulation

Practical Value (⭐⭐⭐)

• Medium-Term Prospect: Qutrit encoding possibly realizable on high-quality spin platforms within 2-5 years
• Long-Term Potential: If technology matures, could significantly reduce quantum computing resource requirements
• Current Limitation: High experimental barriers limit near-term large-scale application

Reproducibility (⭐⭐⭐⭐)

• Theory Reproducible: Complete formulas, clear mathematical derivations
• Numerics Reproducible: Simulation parameters explicit, easy to reproduce
• Experiment Difficult: Lacks concrete experimental protocols

Applicable Scenarios

Ideal Application Scenarios

1. Quantum Simulation:
   • Multi-level atom/molecule system simulation
   • Nuclear magnetic resonance quantum simulation
   • Chemical reaction dynamics
2. Quantum Storage:
   • Nuclear spin quantum memory
   • Molecular magnet long-lived storage
   • Storage nodes in hybrid quantum systems
3. Specific Platforms:
   • Bi-doped Si (nuclear spin I=9/2)
   • Giant molecular magnets (S>10)
   • Trapped Ba-133 (large angular momentum)

Inapplicable Scenarios

1. Near-Term NISQ Devices: Current gate fidelity insufficient
2. Superconducting Qubits: Inherently two-level systems
3. Photonic Systems: Better suited for GKP codes
4. Fast-Gate-Required Algorithms: High-dimensional rotations potentially slow

Comparison with Related Work

Unique Advantage of This Work: Achieves polynomial resource consumption in finite-dimensional systems while maintaining balance between theoretical rigor and experimental feasibility.

Key References

13 S. Lim et al., "Fault-tolerant qubit encoding using a spin-7/2 qudit", PRA 108, 062403 (2023) - Authors' prior work

27 E. Knill & R. Laflamme, "Theory of quantum error-correcting codes", PRA 55, 900 (1997) - KL criterion theoretical foundation

29 D. Gottesman et al., "Encoding a qubit in an oscillator", PRA 64, 012310 (2001) - Original GKP code paper

31 S. Lim et al., "Demonstrating experimentally the encoding...", PRL 134, 070603 (2025) - Prior experimental verification work

42 I. Fernández de Fuentes et al., "Navigating the 16-dimensional Hilbert space...", Nat. Commun. 15, 1380 (2024) - High-dimensional spin control

Overall Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5)

This is an excellent paper with strong theoretical innovation and comprehensive analysis, providing important new perspectives for the quantum error correction field. Its exponential resource advantage holds significant theoretical and potential practical value. Main shortcomings are missing experimental feasibility verification and incomplete theoretical rigor. Recommended future work should focus on: (1) proof-of-concept experiments on existing platforms; (2) mathematical proofs of optimal encoding; (3) more comprehensive noise model analysis.