2025-11-23T08:58:16.033117

3D4D: An Interactive, Editable, 4D World Model via 3D Video Generation

He, Yuan, Tu et al.
We introduce 3D4D, an interactive 4D visualization framework that integrates WebGL with Supersplat rendering. It transforms static images and text into coherent 4D scenes through four core modules and employs a foveated rendering strategy for efficient, real-time multi-modal interaction. This framework enables adaptive, user-driven exploration of complex 4D environments. The project page and code are available at https://yunhonghe1021.github.io/NOVA/.
academic

3D4D: An Interactive, Editable, 4D World Model via 3D Video Generation

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2511.08536
  • Title: 3D4D: An Interactive, Editable, 4D World Model via 3D Video Generation
  • Authors: Yunhong He (Lehigh University), Zhengqing Yuan (University of Notre Dame), Zhengzhong Tu (Texas A&M University), Yanfang Ye (University of Notre Dame), Lichao Sun (Lehigh University)
  • Category: cs.CV (Computer Vision)
  • Publication Date: November 11, 2025 (arXiv v1)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08536
  • Project Homepage: https://yunhonghe1021.github.io/NOVA/

Abstract

This paper introduces 3D4D, an interactive 4D visualization framework that integrates WebGL and Supersplat rendering technologies. The framework transforms static images and text into coherent 4D scenes through four core modules, employing a foveal rendering strategy to achieve efficient real-time multimodal interaction. The framework supports user-driven adaptive exploration of complex 4D environments.

Research Background and Motivation

Problems to Address

Existing 4D content generation and visualization systems face three core challenges:

  1. Insufficient Real-time Rendering Capability: Traditional WebGL frameworks struggle with real-time 4D rendering and fine-grained temporal navigation
  2. High Computational Cost: Elevated computational expenses, latency, and scalability issues limit practical applications
  3. Lack of Interactivity: Existing systems lack truly interactive 4D environments and cannot seamlessly combine high-performance rendering with user interaction

Problem Significance

With the advancement of generative models and multimodal learning, text-driven and multimodal interactive generation have become more intuitive. However, the lack of efficient 4D visualization and interaction frameworks severely limits the practical value of 4D content. True 4D interactive environments are crucial for virtual reality, digital twins, and film production.

Limitations of Existing Methods

  • WonderJourney, LucidDreamer, etc.: Primarily focus on 3D scene generation, lacking dynamic temporal dimension handling
  • SV4D, 4D-fy and other 4D generation methods: While capable of generating 4D content, they do not support real-time interaction with lower frame rates (16-40 fps)
  • Traditional WebGL frameworks: Do not support fine-grained temporal interaction and efficient 4D scene editing

Research Motivation

Develop a 4D visualization framework that simultaneously satisfies high-performance rendering, real-time interaction, and user editing requirements, enabling users to explore and manipulate complex 4D environments in a natural manner.

Core Contributions

  1. Proposed 3D4D Framework: The first interactive 4D visualization system integrating WebGL and Supersplat rendering, supporting end-to-end generation from static images and text to 4D scenes
  2. Foveal Rendering Strategy: Inspired by human peripheral vision, employing a VLM-guided adaptive rendering strategy that reduces GPU memory usage and latency while maintaining semantic alignment and visual consistency
  3. Real-time Interaction Capability: Achieves 60 fps rendering speed, the first 4D scene generation system supporting truly real-time interaction
  4. Complete Editing Toolset: Provides multiple editing tools including rectangular, brush, polygon, lasso, and sphere selection, supporting precise object and region operations
  5. Superior Performance: Achieves best-in-class performance on CLIP Consistency (30.40) and CLIP Score (0.9951) metrics, significantly surpassing existing methods

Method Details

Task Definition

Input:

  • Single static panoramic or ordinary image
  • Natural language text description (prompts for scene dynamic changes)

Output:

  • Interactive 4D scene (3D space + temporal dimension)
  • Visualization environment supporting real-time rendering, editing, and navigation

Constraints:

  • Maintain temporal coherence and visual consistency
  • Meet real-time interaction requirements (≥60 fps)
  • Operate within limited computational resources

System Architecture

The 3D4D system comprises backend generation pipeline and frontend rendering system:

Backend Generation Pipeline (Four Core Modules)

  1. 3D Scene Reconstruction Module
    • Converts input static images into 3D architectural models
    • Extracts geometric structure and spatial information of scenes
  2. Image-to-Video Synthesis Module
    • Generates temporally coherent video sequences based on text prompts
    • Ensures generated videos conform to user-specified dynamic changes
  3. Video-to-Frame Decomposition Module
    • Decomposes generated videos into continuous frame sequences
    • Extracts necessary visual information for each frame
  4. 4D Scene Generation Module
    • Fuses continuous frames and 3D architectural models
    • Generates complete 4D scene representation (multiple PLY point cloud files)

Frontend Rendering System

Core Technology Stack:

  • WebGL: Provides underlying graphics rendering capability
  • Supersplat: High-performance 3D Gaussian point cloud rendering engine

Key Functionalities:

  1. Real-time 4D Visualization
    • Streams multiple PLY point cloud files to frontend
    • Sequential rendering or looping playback forms continuous 4D video
    • Supports dynamic adjustment of camera pose, playback speed, and frame rate
  2. Interactive Timeline
    • Fine-grained temporal navigation control
    • Users can balance between visual quality and efficiency
  3. Scene Editing Tools
    • Rectangular selection, brush, polygon, lasso, sphere selection
    • Precise object and region operations
    • All interactions synchronized with backend via API

Technical Innovations

1. VLM-Guided Foveal Rendering Strategy

This is the paper's most core technical innovation, inspired by the foveal characteristics of human visual systems:

Workflow:

Input PLY Point Cloud → VLM Analysis → Generate Importance Map → Adaptive Resource Allocation → Rendering Output

Specific Implementation:

  • VLM Analysis: Uses vision-language models such as Qwen2.5-VL to analyze each frame
  • Importance Map Generation: Identifies semantically critical regions (e.g., people, moving objects)
  • Adaptive Rendering:
    • Foveal region (important areas): Full-precision rendering
    • Peripheral region (background): Blur, low-cost shading
  • Resource Optimization: WebGL shaders dynamically allocate GPU resources

Advantages:

  • Reduces GPU load without compromising perceptual quality
  • Maintains semantic alignment and visual consistency
  • Achieves real-time performance (60 fps)

2. Client-side Real-time Video Generation Pipeline

Video Rendering Functionality:

  • Users upload PLY scenes and define keyframes
  • System automatically interpolates camera trajectories
  • VLM analyzes in real-time and generates importance maps
  • Frame buffer capture, temporal smoothing, real-time encoding
  • Output .webm or .mp4 format videos

Technical Characteristics:

  • Entirely client-side processing, no server computation required
  • Semantically-aware real-time 4D video generation
  • Balances visual fidelity and computational efficiency

3. Customized WebGL Functionality

Since standard WebGL does not support fine-grained temporal interaction, the team developed multiple custom features:

  • Precise temporal dimension control
  • Seamless switching between multiple point cloud files
  • Efficient memory management mechanisms

Distinction from Baseline Methods

FeatureTraditional Methods3D4D
Rendering StrategyUniform renderingSemantically-aware foveal rendering
InteractivityOffline or limited interactionFully real-time interaction
Frame Rate16-40 fps60 fps
Editing CapabilityUnsupported or limitedComplete editing toolset
Resource EfficiencyHigh GPU loadAdaptive resource allocation

Experimental Setup

Dataset

The paper does not provide detailed information about training datasets used, but based on evaluation methods:

  • Uses panoramic images as input
  • Accompanied by natural language prompts for scene generation
  • Evaluation involves multi-view consistency checks

Evaluation Metrics

Performance Metrics

  1. CLIP Score (CS)
    • Definition: CLIP similarity between text scene prompts and rendered images
    • Significance: Evaluates semantic alignment quality; higher values indicate better alignment with text descriptions
  2. CLIP Consistency (CC)
    • Definition: Cosine similarity of CLIP embeddings between each novel view image and center reference view
    • Significance: Evaluates visual consistency across different viewpoints; higher values indicate better multi-view consistency

Efficiency Metrics

  1. FPS (Frames Per Second)
    • Measures rendering speed
    • Key indicator for real-time interaction
  2. Real-time Interaction
    • Binary indicator: Whether real-time interaction is supported
    • Criterion: Immediate responsiveness to user operations

Comparison Methods

The paper compares against the following methods:

3D Scene Generation Methods:

  • WonderJourney (Yu et al. 2024)
  • LucidDreamer
  • Text2Room (Höllein et al. 2023)
  • WonderWorld

4D Content Generation Methods:

  • SV4D (Xie et al. 2024)
  • 4D-fy (Bahmani et al. 2024)

Implementation Details

  • Frontend developed based on WebGL and Supersplat
  • VLM uses Qwen2.5-VL
  • Point cloud format: PLY
  • Video encoding: .webm or .mp4
  • Rendering target: 60 fps real-time performance

Experimental Results

Main Results

Performance Comparison (Table 1)

ModelCLIP Consistency (CC)CLIP Score (CS)
WonderJourney27.340.9544
LucidDreamer26.720.8972
Text2Room24.500.9035
WonderWorld29.470.9948
SV4D30.290.8856
4D-fy11.230.6147
3D4D (Ours)30.400.9951

Key Findings:

  • 3D4D achieves 30.40 on CC metric, slightly outperforming SV4D's 30.29
  • 3D4D achieves 0.9951 on CS metric, the highest among all methods
  • 4D-fy shows the poorest performance, possibly due to methodological limitations
  • 3D4D achieves optimal balance in both semantic alignment and visual consistency

Efficiency Comparison (Table 2)

ModelFPSReal-time Interaction
SV4D40
4D-fy16
3D4D (Ours)60

Key Findings:

  • 3D4D achieves 60 fps, 50% faster than SV4D and 275% faster than 4D-fy
  • 3D4D is the only method supporting truly real-time interaction
  • Frame rate advantage directly translates to superior user experience

Visualization Results

The paper provides examples (Figure 2) demonstrating:

  • Input: Single panoramic photograph + natural language prompt
  • Evaluation Dimensions:
    • Controllability
    • Quality
    • Dynamics
  • Multi-view Consistency: Shows scene consistency when viewed from different angles

Foveal Rendering Effects (Figure 3)

Demonstrates the effectiveness of adaptive rendering strategy:

  • Semantically important regions rendered at high resolution
  • Peripheral regions employ color approximation and background processing
  • Visually imperceptible quality loss while significantly reducing computational cost

Experimental Findings

  1. Effectiveness of Semantically-Aware Rendering: VLM-guided foveal rendering strategy significantly improves performance while maintaining visual quality
  2. Importance of Real-time Interaction: 60 fps and real-time interaction capability are key differentiators in user experience
  3. Advantages of Multimodal Integration: Combining text, image, and 4D rendering enables better understanding and generation of complex scenes
  4. Scalability: System runs client-side with good scalability and deployment convenience

Generative Models and Multimodal Learning

  • Text-to-image generation: Stable Diffusion (Rombach et al. 2022)
  • Visual instruction tuning: LLaVA (Liu et al. 2023)
  • Multimodal large language models: TinyGPT-V (Yuan et al. 2023)
  • Video generation: MORA (Yuan et al. 2024a), BORA (Sun et al. 2024)

3D Scene Generation

  • Text2Room (Höllein et al. 2023): Extracts textured 3D meshes from 2D text-to-image models
  • WonderJourney (Yu et al. 2024): 3D scene exploration
  • LucidDreamer: 3D scene reconstruction

4D Content Generation

  • Text2-4D (Singer et al. 2023): Text-to-4D dynamic scene generation
  • SV4D (Xie et al. 2024): Dynamic 3D content with multi-frame and multi-view consistency
  • 4D-fy (Bahmani et al. 2024): Text-to-4D generation using hybrid score distillation sampling
  • SC4D (Wu et al. 2024): Sparse-controlled video-to-4D generation

WebGL and Real-time Rendering

  • 4K4D (Xu et al. 2024): 4K resolution real-time 4D view synthesis
  • Supersplat: Browser-based 3D Gaussian point cloud editing tool

Advantages of This Work

  • First Truly Interactive 4D System: Existing methods either lack 4D support or real-time interaction
  • End-to-End Solution: Complete pipeline from input to rendering
  • Semantically-Aware Optimization: Intelligent resource allocation using VLM
  • Strong Practicality: Based on Web technology, easy to deploy and use

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Technical Feasibility: Demonstrates the feasibility of implementing high-performance 4D interactive visualization in browser environments
  2. Performance Superiority: Comprehensively surpasses existing methods in semantic alignment, visual consistency, and rendering speed
  3. Enhanced User Experience: 60 fps and real-time interaction capability significantly improve 4D content exploration experience
  4. Resource Efficiency: Foveal rendering strategy effectively balances visual quality and computational cost

Limitations

  1. Insufficient Experimental Details:
    • Training datasets and data scale not clearly specified
    • Lacks detailed ablation studies validating component contributions
    • Absence of user study data
  2. Simplified Method Description:
    • Implementation details of backend modules insufficiently detailed
    • Technical details of VLM importance map generation missing
    • Lacks algorithm pseudocode and mathematical formulas
  3. Limited Evaluation Scope:
    • Only uses CLIP-related metrics, lacking diverse evaluation approaches
    • Does not evaluate applicability across different scene types
    • Lacks failure case analysis
  4. Computational Resource Requirements:
    • Client-side hardware requirements not clearly specified
    • Performance on different devices unknown
  5. Scene Complexity Limitations:
    • Maximum scene complexity the system can handle not specified
    • Performance under extreme conditions unknown

Future Directions

While not explicitly stated in the paper, the following research directions can be inferred:

  1. Higher Resolution Support: Extend to 8K or higher resolution 4D rendering
  2. More Complex Interactions: Support physics simulation, collision detection, and other advanced interactions
  3. Multi-user Collaboration: Enable multiple users to simultaneously edit and explore the same 4D scene
  4. Mobile Optimization: Adapt to mobile device performance and interaction paradigms
  5. AI-Assisted Editing: Leverage AI to automatically optimize scene layout and animation

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Technical Innovation (★★★★☆)

  • Foveal Rendering Strategy: Cleverly applies human visual system characteristics to computer graphics
  • VLM-Guided Resource Allocation: First application of vision-language models to rendering optimization, opening new directions
  • Real-time 4D Interaction: Achieves important technical breakthrough

2. Practical Value (★★★★★)

  • Easy Deployment: Based on Web technology, no complex installation required
  • User-Friendly: Intuitive interaction interface and editing tools
  • Broad Applications: Applicable to virtual reality, digital twins, film production, and other domains
  • Open-Source Friendly: Provides project homepage and code

3. Performance (★★★★★)

  • SOTA Performance: Achieves best results on CC and CS metrics
  • High Frame Rate: 60 fps far exceeds competing methods
  • Real-time Interaction: Only system supporting truly real-time interaction

4. System Completeness (★★★★☆)

  • Provides complete pipeline from input to output
  • Integrates generation, rendering, and editing functionalities
  • Well-coordinated frontend and backend design

Weaknesses

1. Paper Completeness (★★☆☆☆)

  • Missing Experimental Details: Training data, hyperparameters, implementation details insufficient
  • Missing Ablation Studies: Does not independently validate component contributions
  • Missing User Studies: Lacks real user experience evaluation

2. Method Description (★★★☆☆)

  • Backend modules described too briefly
  • Lacks algorithm pseudocode and mathematical formulas
  • VLM importance map generation mechanism unclear

3. Evaluation Comprehensiveness (★★★☆☆)

  • Single evaluation metric (only CLIP-related)
  • Lacks testing across diverse scenarios
  • No failure case analysis
  • Limited comparison with additional baselines

4. Technical Details (★★☆☆☆)

  • Hardware requirements unclear
  • Scalability boundaries unknown
  • Performance under extreme conditions unevaluated

Impact Assessment

Contribution to Field (★★★★☆)

  • Pioneering Work: First truly real-time interactive 4D visualization system
  • Methodological Inspiration: Foveal rendering strategy applicable to other graphics tasks
  • Technology Integration: Demonstrates effective integration of WebGL, Gaussian point clouds, and VLM

Practical Value (★★★★★)

  • Immediately Usable: Provides online demonstrations and code
  • Commercial Potential: Directly applicable to multiple commercial scenarios
  • Educational Value: Provides user-friendly tools for 4D content creation

Reproducibility (★★★☆☆)

  • Strengths: Provides project homepage and code commitment
  • Weaknesses: Insufficient paper details may affect reproducibility
  • Dependencies: Requires specific tools like Supersplat

Applicable Scenarios

Ideal Application Scenarios

  1. Virtual Reality: Creating interactive VR environments
  2. Digital Twins: Real-time visualization and editing of digital twin scenes
  3. Film Production: Quick preview and editing of 4D scenes
  4. Architectural Visualization: Demonstrating architectural changes over time
  5. Educational Training: Creating interactive teaching scenarios

Unsuitable Scenarios

  1. High-Precision Requirements: Such as precise measurements in scientific visualization
  2. Complex Physics Simulation: System lacks integrated physics engine
  3. Extremely Large-Scale Scenes: Performance boundaries unknown
  4. Low-End Devices: Requires certain GPU performance support

Overall Rating

DimensionScoreExplanation
Innovation8/10Foveal rendering and VLM-guided optimization are important innovations
Technical Depth6/10Complete system implementation but insufficient paper description
Experimental Sufficiency5/10Lacks ablation studies and user research
Practical Value9/10Highly practical, easy to deploy and use
Writing Quality6/10Clear structure but insufficient details
Overall7.5/10Excellent systems work, but paper completeness needs improvement

Selected References

  1. Rombach et al. (2022): High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models - Foundational work for Stable Diffusion
  2. Xie et al. (2024): SV4D: Dynamic 3d content generation with multi-frame and multi-view consistency - Primary competing method
  3. Bahmani et al. (2024): 4d-fy: Text-to-4d generation using hybrid score distillation sampling - Alternative 4D generation baseline
  4. Wang et al. (2024): Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception - VLM used in this work
  5. PlayCanvas and Contributors (2025): SuperSplat Online Editor - Core rendering engine

Suitable Readers:

  • Computer graphics researchers
  • Virtual reality developers
  • 4D content creators
  • Web graphics technology engineers

Reading Focus:

  • Design philosophy of foveal rendering strategy
  • Integration methods of WebGL and Gaussian point clouds
  • Application of VLM in graphics rendering
  • Implementation techniques for real-time 4D interaction

Supplementary Reading Recommended:

  • Supersplat technical documentation
  • 3D Gaussian point cloud related papers
  • WebGL performance optimization best practices