Rhaly operators acting on Hardy and Bergman spaces

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2511.09201
• Title: Rhaly operators acting on Hardy and Bergman spaces
• Authors: Petros Galanopoulos (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki), Daniel Girela (Universidad de Málaga)
• Classification: math.CV (Complex Variables)
• Submission Date: November 12, 2025 to arXiv
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09201

Abstract

This paper investigates the characterization of complex sequences $(η) = \{η_n\}_{n=0}^∞$ and the boundedness and compactness of the associated Rhaly operator $R(η)$ on Hardy spaces $H^p$ ($1 ≤ p < ∞$) and Bergman spaces $A^p$ ($1 ≤ p < ∞$). The paper completely characterizes sequences $(η)$ for which $R(η)$ is bounded or compact on $H^p$ ($1 < p ≤ 2$) and $A^p$ ($1 < p < ∞$), and provides necessary or sufficient conditions for the cases $p=1$ and $2 < p < ∞$. In particular, it is proven that when $2 ≤ p < ∞$ and $η_n = O(1/n)$, then $R(η)$ is bounded on $H^p$; however, there exist sequences satisfying $η_n = O(1/n)$ such that $R(η)$ is not bounded on $H^p$ ($1 ≤ p < 2$).

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Formulation

1. Core Problem: The Rhaly operator is an operator induced by the Rhaly matrix through matrix multiplication. Given a complex sequence $(η) = \{η_n\}_{n=0}^∞$, the Rhaly matrix is defined as a lower triangular matrix whose $n$-th row has its first $n+1$ entries all equal to $η_n$. The corresponding Rhaly operator acting on sequences $(a) = \{a_n\}_{n=0}^∞$ is given by: $R(η)(a) = \left\{η_n \sum_{k=0}^n a_k\right\}_{n=0}^∞$
   The core problem addressed is: characterize which sequences $(η)$ make $R(η)$ bounded ($R(η) ∈ B(H^p)$) or compact ($R(η) ∈ K(H^p)$) on Hardy and Bergman spaces.
2. Significance of the Problem:
   • The Cesàro operator (corresponding to $η_n = 1/(n+1)$) is a classical operator known to be bounded on $H^p$ ($0 < p < ∞$) and $A^p_α$ ($0 < p < ∞, α > -1$)
   • The Rhaly operator generalizes the Cesàro operator; studying its properties helps understand a broader class of operators
   • On $\ell^p$ spaces, the boundedness and compactness of Rhaly operators have been completely characterized, but the problem is more complex on function spaces
3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
   • For $H^2$ spaces, complete characterization exists due to the isometric isomorphism with $\ell^2$
   • For $p ≠ 2$, systematic study is lacking
   • Cesàro-type operators $C_μ$ (induced by Borel measures) have integral representations, but general Rhaly operators lack such representations, making analysis more difficult
   • For Dirichlet-type spaces $D^2_α$, some results exist, but complete characterization for general $H^p$ and $A^p$ spaces remains incomplete
4. Research Motivation:
   • Complete the theory of Rhaly operators, filling gaps for $p ≠ 2$
   • Reveal essential differences in Hardy and Bergman spaces under different indices $p$
   • Establish precise connections between operator boundedness/compactness and sequence growth rates

Core Contributions

The main contributions of this paper include:

1. Complete Characterization for Hardy Spaces ($1 < p ≤ 2$):
   • $R(η) ∈ B(H^p)$ if and only if $F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$ (Theorem 1(a))
   • $R(η) ∈ K(H^p)$ if and only if $F(η) ∈ λ^p_{1/p}$ (Theorem 2(a)) where $F(η)(z) = \sum_{n=0}^∞ η_n z^n$ is the generating function
2. Complete Characterization for Bergman Spaces ($1 < p < ∞$):
   • $R(η) ∈ B(A^p)$ if and only if $F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$ (Theorem 3(a))
   • $R(η) ∈ K(A^p)$ if and only if $F(η) ∈ λ^p_{1/p}$ (Theorem 3(b))
3. Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for $2 < p < ∞$:
   • Necessary condition: If $R(η) ∈ B(H^p)$, then $F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$ (Theorem 1(b))
   • Sufficient condition: If there exists $q ∈ (2,p)$ such that $F(η) ∈ Λ^q_{1/q}$, then $R(η) ∈ B(H^p)$ (Theorem 1(c))
   • Similar results for compactness (Theorem 2)
4. Asymmetry of the $η_n = O(1/n)$ Condition (Theorem 4):
   • For $2 ≤ p < ∞$, $η_n = O(1/n)$ ensures $R(η) ∈ B(H^p)$
   • However, for $1 ≤ p < 2$, there exist sequences with $η_n = O(1/n)$ but $R(η) ∉ B(H^p)$
   • For monotone nonnegative sequences, $R(η) ∈ B(H^p)$ is equivalent to $η_n = O(1/n)$
5. Special Results for $H^1$ Spaces (Theorem 7):
   • If $F'(η) ∈ H^1$, then $R(η) ∈ K(H^1)$ (stronger than boundedness)
   • Two necessary conditions are provided: $\sum_{n=0}^N n|η_n| = O(N)$ and $\|\Delta_N(F(η))'\|_{H^1} = O(\log N)$
6. Construction of "Lipschitz" Cesàro Basis:
   • Generalizes Pavlović's "smooth" Cesàro basis construction
   • This is a key technical tool for proving necessity

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Given a complex sequence $(η) = \{η_n\}_{n=0}^∞$, define:

• Rhaly operator: $R(η)(f)(z) = \sum_{n=0}^∞ η_n \left(\sum_{k=0}^n a_k\right) z^n$, where $f(z) = \sum_{n=0}^∞ a_n z^n$
• Generating function: $F(η)(z) = \sum_{n=0}^∞ η_n z^n$
• Objective: Characterize sequences $(η)$ such that $R(η)$ is bounded ($R(η) ∈ B(H^p)$) or compact ($R(η) ∈ K(H^p)$) on Hardy or Bergman spaces

Key Space Definitions:

• Mean Lipschitz Space $Λ^p_α$: $f ∈ Λ^p_α$ if and only if $M_p(r, f') = O((1-r)^{α-1})$
• Little-oh Space $λ^p_α$: $f ∈ λ^p_α$ if and only if $(1-r)^{1-α}M_p(r, f') → 0$ as $r → 1$
• where $M_p(r, f) = \left(\frac{1}{2π}\int_0^{2π} |f(re^{iθ})|^p dθ\right)^{1/p}$

Core Technical Approach

The paper employs a two-directional proof strategy:

1. Necessity Proof ($R(η)$ bounded $⇒$ $F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$)

Key Construction (for Hardy spaces):

• Test Function Family: For $N = 2, 3, ...$, define $f_N(z) = \frac{1}{N^{2-1/p}} \frac{a_N z}{(1-a_N z)^2}, \quad a_N = 1 - \frac{1}{N}$
  These functions satisfy $\|f_N\|_{H^p} ≲ 1$
• Operator Action: Compute $R(η)(f_N)(z) = \sum_{k=1}^∞ η_k k α_{k,N} z^k$ where $α_{k,N} = \frac{1}{kN^{2-1/p}} \sum_{n=1}^k n a_N^n$
• Lipschitz Cesàro Basis Construction:
  • Define $β_{k,N} = 1/α_{k,N}$
  • Construct piecewise linear function $Ψ_N$ with vertices at $(k/N, β_{k,N})$ ($N ≤ k ≤ 2N$)
  • Prove $L(Ψ_N) ≲ N^{1-1/p}$ (Lipschitz constant estimate)
• Convolution Technique: Define $H_N(z) = \sum_{k=0}^{4N} Ψ_N(k/N) z^k$
  Using Riesz projection theorem and convolution properties, obtain $\|\Delta_N(F'(η))\|_{H^p} ≲ N^{1-1/p} \|R(η)(f_N)\|_{H^p} ≲ N^{1-1/p}$
  By Theorem A, this is equivalent to $F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$

Adjustments for Bergman Spaces:

• Test functions become $g_N(z) = N^{(α+1)/p} f_N(z)$
• Use area measure norm estimates
• Apply Lemma 2 (convolution lemma) for Bergman norms

2. Sufficiency Proof ($F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$ $⇒$ $R(η)$ bounded)

Key Intermediate Result (Theorem 5):

• Prove $R(η): H^p → D^p_{p-1}$ is bounded (where $D^p_{p-1}$ is a Dirichlet-type space)
• Use embedding relations:
  • $D^p_{p-1} ⊂ H^p$ ($1 < p ≤ 2$)
  • $H^p ⊂ D^p_{p-1}$ ($2 < p < ∞$)

Proof Techniques:

• Shift Operator Trick: Define $S[f](z) = zf(z)$, then $S[R(η)(f)]'(z) = S[F(η)]' ⋆ g(z)$ where $g(z) = f(z)/(1-z)$
• Convolution Estimates: Use $M_q(r^2, [R(η)(f)]') ≲ M_q(r, F'(η)) M_1(r, g)$
• Hölder Inequality Application: $M_1(r, g) ≲ \frac{1}{(1-r)^{1/(γp)}} M_{γp}(r, f)$
• Norm Estimates: Combining the above estimates yields $\|R(η)(f)\|_{X_{q,p}}^p ≲ \int_0^1 β_{q,1/q}^p(r, F(η)) \frac{1}{(1-r)^{1/γ}} M_{γp}^p(r, f) dr$
  By $F(η) ∈ Λ^q_{1/q}$ and Hardy-Littlewood theorem (Theorem 5.11), boundedness follows

3. Compactness Proof

Finite Rank Approximation: Define $R_N(f)(z) = \sum_{n=0}^N η_n \left(\sum_{k=0}^n a_k\right) z^n$

Prove that when $F(η) ∈ λ^p_{1/p}$: $\|R(η) - R_N\|_{B(H^p, X_{q,p})} → 0, \quad N → ∞$

Use Proposition 1: If $f ∈ λ^p_α$, then $β_{p,α}(f - S_N f) → 0$

Technical Innovations

1. Lipschitz Cesàro Basis Construction:
   • Generalizes Pavlović's method to the Lipschitz setting
   • Controls Lipschitz constant through refined difference estimates
   • Key inequality (2.17): $|(1-e^{iθ})^2 W^Ψ_n(e^{iθ})| ≤ 14L(Ψ)$
2. Combination of Shift Operators and Convolutions:
   • Establishes key identity $S[R(η)(f)]' = S[F(η)]' ⋆ g$
   • Simplifies analysis using $L^p$ estimates for convolutions
3. Introduction of Mixed Norm Spaces $X_{q,p}$:
   • For $2 < p < ∞$, establishes sufficient conditions through intermediate spaces with $1 < q < p$
   • Uses Flett embedding theorem (3.19)
4. Rademacher Function Construction for Counterexamples:
   • Constructs sequences with $η_n = O(1/n)$ but $R(η) ∉ B(H^p)$ ($p < 2$)
   • Based on decomposition of $h(z) = \log(1/(1-z))$
5. Special Treatment of Monotone Sequences:
   • For monotone nonnegative sequences, uses Proposition A to establish equivalence between $F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$ and $η_n = O(1/n)$
   • Reveals importance of monotonicity assumption

Experimental Setup

As a pure theoretical mathematics paper, this work contains no numerical experiments. All results are obtained through rigorous mathematical proofs.

Theoretical Verification Methods

1. Constructive Proofs:
   • Verify necessity through explicit construction of test function families
   • Verify optimality of conditions through counterexample construction
2. Counterexample Construction:
   • Theorem 4(ii): Uses Rademacher functions to construct sequences with $η_n = O(1/n)$ but $R(η) ∉ B(H^p)$ ($p < 2$)
   • Specific construction: $Υ(z) = \sum_{k=0}^∞ (Δ_{2^k}h)_{t_k}(z)$, where $t_k$ are selected via Khinchine inequality
3. Extreme Case Analysis:
   • $p = 1$: Provides necessary conditions but incomplete characterization
   • $p = 2$: Uses isometric isomorphism between $H^2$ and $\ell^2$
   • $2 < p < ∞$: Establishes gap between sufficient and necessary conditions

Experimental Results

Summary of Main Theoretical Results

Key Findings

1. Complete Characterization for Bergman Spaces (Theorem 3):
   • For all $1 < p < ∞$, $R(η) ∈ B(A^p)$ if and only if $F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$
   • This is a complete characterization with no gaps
2. $p$-Dependence in Hardy Spaces (Theorems 1 and 2):
   • $1 < p ≤ 2$: Complete characterization
   • $2 < p < ∞$: Gap exists between sufficient and necessary conditions
   • Gap reflects need for stronger condition $F(η) ∈ Λ^q_{1/q}$ ($q < p$) to ensure boundedness
3. Asymmetry of the $η_n = O(1/n)$ Condition (Theorem 4):
   • Positive Result: For $2 ≤ p < ∞$, $η_n = O(1/n)$ $⇒$ $R(η) ∈ B(H^p)$
   • Counterexample: For $1 ≤ p < 2$, there exist $η_n = O(1/n)$ with $R(η) ∉ B(H^p)$
   • Monotone Case: For monotone nonnegative sequences, $R(η) ∈ B(H^p)$ $⇔$ $η_n = O(1/n)$ (all $1 < p < ∞$)
4. Special Properties of $H^1$ (Theorem 7):
   • Condition $F'(η) ∈ H^1$ not only ensures boundedness but also compactness
   • Necessary conditions: $\sum_{n=0}^N n|η_n| = O(N)$ and $\|\Delta_N(F(η))'\|_{H^1} = O(\log N)$
   • These conditions are weaker than sufficient conditions, indicating $H^1$ case remains incomplete

Specific Estimates

1. Test Function Norms (Related Lemmas):
   • $\|f_N\|_{H^p} ≲ 1$ for all $N$
   • $\|g_N\|_{A^p_α} ≍ 1$ when $α < 2p - 2$
2. Lipschitz Constant Estimates:
   • Hardy space case: $L(Ψ_N) ≲ N^{1-1/p}$
   • Bergman space case: $L(Ψ_N) ≲ N^{1-(2+α)/p}$
3. Block Norm Estimates:
   • $\|\Delta_N(F'(η))\|_{H^p} = O(N^{1-1/p})$ $⇔$ $F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$
   • $\|\Delta_N(F'(η))\|_{H^p} = o(N^{1-1/p})$ $⇔$ $F(η) ∈ λ^p_{1/p}$

Related Work

Historical Background

1. Classical Results on Cesàro Operators:
   • Hardy-Landau (1920-1926): Cesàro operator is bounded on $\ell^p$ ($1 < p ≤ ∞$)
   • Multiple authors (1987-2000): Cesàro operator is bounded on $H^p$ ($0 < p < ∞$) and $A^p_α$
   • Different proof methods by Siskakis, Miao, Nowak, and others
2. Cesàro-Type Operators $C_μ$:
   • Galanopoulos-Girela-Merchán (2022): For positive measure $μ$ on $[0,1)$, $C_μ$ is bounded on $H^p$ or $A^p_α$ if and only if $μ$ is a Carleson measure
   • Equivalent to $μ_n = O(1/(n+1))$
   • Extensions to complex Borel measures by Blasco, Beltrán-Meneu, and others
3. Rhaly Operators on Sequence Spaces:
   • Galanopoulos-Girela-Prǎjiturǎ (2024): Complete characterization of boundedness and compactness on $\ell^p$ ($1 < p < ∞$)
   • Bellavita-Dellepiane-Stylogiannis (2024): Schatten class characterization
4. Dirichlet-Type Spaces:
   • Blasco-Galanopoulos-Girela (2025): Characterization of $R(η): D^2_α → D^2_β$
   • Bao-Guo-Sun-Wang (2024): Hankel matrices on Dirichlet spaces

Innovations in This Paper

1. Extension to General $p$:
   • Previous work mainly focused on $p = 2$ (using Hilbert space structure)
   • This paper systematically studies all $1 ≤ p < ∞$
2. Complete Characterization for Bergman Spaces:
   • First complete characterization for all $1 < p < ∞$
   • Proof methods differ from Hardy spaces, requiring area measure techniques
3. Revealing Complexity of Hardy Spaces:
   • Discovers gap between sufficient and necessary conditions for $2 < p < ∞$
   • Constructs counterexamples showing asymmetry of $η_n = O(1/n)$ condition
4. Technical Contributions:
   • Lipschitz Cesàro basis construction
   • Systematic application of shift operators and convolutions
   • Introduction of mixed norm spaces

Comparison with Related Work

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Complete Theory for Bergman Spaces:
   • For all $1 < p < ∞$, $R(η)$ is bounded/compact on $A^p$ if and only if $F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$ / $λ^p_{1/p}$
   • Provides practical criteria for determining Rhaly operator properties
2. Hierarchical Structure of Hardy Spaces:
   • $1 < p ≤ 2$: Complete characterization with condition $F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$
   • $2 < p < ∞$: Gap exists between sufficient condition ($F(η) ∈ Λ^q_{1/q}$, $q < p$) and necessary condition ($F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$)
   • $p = 1$: Only partial results available; problem is more difficult
3. Refinement of Growth Conditions:
   • $η_n = O(1/n)$ is sufficient for $p ≥ 2$ but not for $p < 2$
   • Under monotonicity assumption, $η_n = O(1/n)$ becomes necessary and sufficient
   • This shows oscillatory behavior of sequences has essential impact on operator properties
4. Central Role of Mean Lipschitz Spaces:
   • $Λ^p_{1/p}$ space is the natural tool for characterizing Rhaly operators
   • Its definition through derivative $L^p$ growth directly relates to operator analysis

Limitations

1. Gap in Hardy Spaces for $2 < p < ∞$:
   • Sufficient condition requires $F(η) ∈ Λ^q_{1/q}$ ($q < p$), necessary condition only gives $F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$
   • True necessary and sufficient condition remains unknown
   • May require new technical tools or intermediate function spaces
2. Incompleteness for $H^1$ Spaces:
   • Only necessary conditions and partial sufficient conditions provided
   • Complete characterization may require deeper real analysis techniques
   • Non-reflexivity of $H^1$ creates additional difficulties
3. Complexity of Non-Monotone Sequences:
   • Relationship between $η_n = O(1/n)$ and boundedness is complex for general sequences
   • Counterexample construction relies on Rademacher functions, difficult to generalize
4. Weighted Bergman Spaces:
   • Paper mainly considers $A^p = A^p_0$
   • Results for general $A^p_α$ ($α ≠ 0$) are mentioned but not fully developed
   • Impact of weight parameter $α$ deserves further investigation
5. Quantitative Operator Norm Estimates:
   • Paper focuses on qualitative characterization (boundedness or compactness)
   • Precise estimates for operator norm $\|R(η)\|_{B(H^p)}$ not provided
   • Such quantitative bounds may be important for applications

Future Directions

Research directions implicit but not explicitly stated in the paper include:

1. Complete Resolution of Hardy Space Problem:
   • Eliminate gap for $2 < p < ∞$
   • Completely characterize Rhaly operators on $H^1$
2. Generalization to Other Function Spaces:
   • BMOA spaces
   • Bloch spaces
   • Weighted Hardy/Bergman spaces
3. Schatten Class Properties:
   • Similar to $\ell^2$ results, study $R(η) ∈ S_q(H^2)$ characterization
   • Partial work exists (Bellavita et al., 2024)
4. Spectral Theory of Operators:
   • Study spectrum and essential spectrum of $R(η)$
   • Distribution of eigenvalues
5. Multivariate Generalizations:
   • Rhaly operators on polydisks or unit balls
   • Requires new techniques for multi-index summation
6. Numerical Algorithms:
   • Though this paper is purely theoretical, numerical methods could be developed to determine operator properties of given sequences
   • Numerical verification of $F(η) ∈ Λ^p_{1/p}$

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Completeness:
   • Complete characterization for Bergman spaces is an important contribution
   • Complete characterization for Hardy spaces $1 < p ≤ 2$ fills literature gap
   • Systematic coverage of all $1 ≤ p < ∞$
2. Technical Innovation:
   • Lipschitz Cesàro Basis: Generalizes Pavlović's construction, key to proving necessity
   • Shift Operator Technique: Establishes identity $S[R(η)(f)]' = S[F(η)]' ⋆ g$ simplifying analysis
   • Mixed Norm Spaces: Introduces $X_{q,p}$ to handle $2 < p < ∞$ case
3. Elegant Counterexample Construction:
   • Uses Rademacher functions and Khinchine inequality
   • Proves optimality of $η_n = O(1/n)$ condition
   • Constructive counterexamples clearly demonstrate problem essence
4. Proof Rigor:
   • All theorems have complete proofs
   • Appropriate citations, clear logical chains
   • Careful constant estimates (using $≲, ≍$ notation)
5. Clear Structure:
   • Section 2 systematically introduces preliminaries
   • Main results organized by Hardy spaces, Bergman spaces, further results
   • Theorem statements clear and accessible
6. Connection to Existing Work:
   • Clearly explains relationships to Cesàro operators, $C_μ$ operators, sequence space Rhaly operators
   • Distinguishes new results from generalizations of known results

Weaknesses

1. Incompleteness of Hardy Space Theory:
   • Gap exists for $2 < p < ∞$; complete necessary and sufficient conditions unknown
   • Only partial results for $H^1$
   • Limits applicability range
2. Technical Difficulty of Proofs:
   • Some proofs (e.g., Lipschitz Cesàro basis construction) are highly technical
   • May be difficult for non-specialists to understand
   • Lacks intuitive explanations for why techniques work
3. Absence of Application Discussion:
   • Paper is purely theoretical without application discussion
   • Significance of Rhaly operators in other mathematics branches or applications not mentioned
   • Could benefit from motivating examples
4. Lack of Quantitative Estimates:
   • Extensive use of $O(\cdot), o(\cdot), ≲$ notation
   • No precise bounds for operator norms
   • Quantitative bounds may be more useful for some applications
5. Missing Numerical Verification:
   • Understandable for pure mathematics paper
   • Numerical examples could enhance intuitive understanding
   • Could compute $β_{p,1/p}(F(η))$ for specific sequences $(η)$
6. Limited Discussion of Open Problems:
   • Open problems implicitly suggested by limitations
   • Lacks explicit "Open Problems" section
   • Discussion of future research directions relatively brief

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution:
   • Makes important contribution at intersection of operator theory and complex analysis
   • Complete characterization for Bergman spaces is milestone result in this direction
   • Provides paradigm for studying more general matrix operators
2. Methodological Value:
   • Lipschitz Cesàro basis construction method potentially applicable to other problems
   • Shift operator and convolution combination technique has universal applicability
   • Mixed norm space usage provides new perspective
3. Subsequent Research:
   • Expected to inspire:
     • Elimination of Hardy space gaps
     • Generalization to other function spaces
     • Study of related operators (Hilbert, Hankel operators)
   • Already cited by subsequent work (including authors' other papers)
4. Practical Value:
   • For analysts: Provides practical criteria for determining operator properties
   • For applied mathematicians: Rhaly operators may appear in signal processing, approximation theory
   • For teaching: Suitable as case study in advanced operator theory courses
5. Reproducibility:
   • All proofs complete, theoretically fully verifiable
   • No numerical experiments, no reproducibility issues
   • Counterexample constructions are explicit, computationally verifiable

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research:
   • Study of operators on Hardy and Bergman spaces
   • Applications of Mean Lipschitz spaces
   • Function space realizations of matrix operators
2. Related Problems:
   • Determine properties of Rhaly operators for given sequences $(η)$
   • Study generalizations of Cesàro-type operators
   • Study related operators (Hankel, Toeplitz)
3. Teaching Applications:
   • Advanced operator theory course case studies
   • Applications of function spaces in complex analysis
   • Examples of bounded and compact operators in functional analysis
4. Potential Application Fields:
   • Signal processing filter design (Cesàro averaging)
   • Numerical analysis summation methods
   • Probability theory martingale transforms
5. Non-Applicable Scenarios:
   • Problems requiring explicit operator norm estimates
   • Finite-dimensional problems (Rhaly operators inherently infinite-dimensional)
   • Nonlinear problems (paper studies linear operators)

Key References

The paper cites 44 references; key ones include:

1. Hardy-Landau (1920-1926): Classical results on Cesàro operator boundedness on $\ell^p$
2. Duren (1970, 2000): Standard reference for Hardy space theory
3. Hedenmalm-Korenblum-Zhu (2000): Standard reference for Bergman space theory
4. Bourdon-Shapiro-Sledd (1989): Foundational work on Mean Lipschitz spaces
5. Pavlović (2013, 2014): Function space theory and Cesàro basis construction
6. Galanopoulos-Girela-Merchán (2022): Study of Cesàro-type operators $C_μ$
7. Galanopoulos-Girela-Prǎjiturǎ (2024): Characterization of Rhaly operators on sequence spaces
8. Mateljević-Pavlović (1984): $L^p$ behavior and integral means
9. Flett (1972): Hardy-Littlewood inequality duality
10. Zygmund (1959): Trigonometric series theory (Khinchine inequality)

Summary

This is a high-quality theoretical mathematics paper making important contributions to Rhaly operator theory. Main achievements include complete characterization of Rhaly operators on Bergman spaces and complete characterization on Hardy spaces $1 < p ≤ 2$. Technically, Lipschitz Cesàro basis construction and shift operator technique application are highlights. Main limitations are incompleteness of Hardy space theory for $2 < p < ∞$ and $H^1$, and absence of application discussion. Overall, this represents significant progress in the field, establishing solid foundation for subsequent research.