Production of Light Dark Particles from Nonlinear Compton Scattering Between Intense Laser and Muon or Proton Beam

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2511.09279
• Title: Production of Light Dark Particles from Nonlinear Compton Scattering Between Intense Laser and Muon or Proton Beam
• Authors: Tong Li (Nankai University), Kai Ma (Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology), Man Yuan (Nankai University)
• Classification: hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology)
• Submission Date: November 12, 2025 (arXiv submission)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09279

Abstract

This paper proposes a scheme for producing light dark matter particles through nonlinear Compton scattering between intense laser pulses and muon or proton beams. The study focuses on dark photons and axion-like particles (ALPs) as representative dark matter candidates, calculating the relevant nonlinear Compton scattering cross sections and analyzing standard model background processes with missing neutrinos. The research demonstrates that this laser-induced process provides a complementary and competitive detection method for searching for invisible new particles with masses below approximately 1 MeV.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Research Problem

This paper aims to explore the possibility of producing and detecting light-mass dark matter particles through strong-field quantum electrodynamics (QED) effects via collisions between intense lasers and high-energy charged particle beams.

2. Problem Significance

• Strong-field Physics Frontier: Schwinger predicted in 1951 that when external field strength reaches E ≃ 1.32×10¹⁸ V/m, virtual electron-positron pair fluctuations in the QED vacuum can be converted into real particle pairs. Intense lasers provide a platform for studying such extreme physics.
• Dark Matter Detection Needs: Dark matter is one of the central problems in contemporary physics. The detection window for light-mass dark matter particles (< 1 MeV) is relatively limited, requiring new experimental schemes.
• Facility Feasibility: Global particle accelerator facilities (such as PSI, FNAL, J-PARC, CSNS) can provide high-quality muon and proton beams. Combined with increasingly powerful laser technology, this detection scheme becomes practically feasible.

3. Limitations of Existing Methods

• Collider Experiments: Primarily target heavier new particles (GeV scale and above)
• Beam Dump Experiments: Limited sensitivity to light dark particles
• Low-Energy Precision Measurements: Detection blind spots exist in specific mass ranges

4. Research Motivation

• SLAC observed nonlinear Compton scattering and nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pair production in strong fields in the 1990s
• When the dimensionless parameter ηₑ ≡ eε₀/(ωmₑ) ≳ 1, nonlinear effects become significant
• For muon or proton beams, higher laser power can lead to ηₑ > mμ/mₑ ≃ 207, producing unique electroweak physics phenomena
• Strong fields can significantly modify particle decay and scattering processes, providing new windows for exploring new physics

Core Contributions

1. Proposes New Detection Scheme: First systematic study of dark photon and ALP production through nonlinear Compton scattering from intense laser collisions with muon/proton beams
2. Complete Theoretical Calculation:
   • Exact solution of scattering amplitudes in strong fields based on Volkov wavefunctions
   • Calculation of differential and total cross sections for dark photon and ALP production
   • Includes nonlinear effects from multi-photon absorption (n=1-6)
3. Background Analysis: Detailed calculation of standard model background processes mediated by W± and Z bosons (producing missing neutrinos)
4. Sensitivity Assessment:
   • Dark photon kinetic mixing parameter: ϵ ~ 1.6×10⁻⁷ (muon beam) and 1.4×10⁻⁶ (proton beam)
   • ALP-muon coupling: gₐμ as low as 5×10⁻² (3.1 GeV) to 2×10⁻⁵ (10 TeV)
   • Provides complementary detection capability in the mχ < 1 MeV region
5. Physical Insights:
   • Dark photon production cross section is independent of beam energy
   • ALP production cross section increases with beam energy
   • Multi-photon nonlinear effects make significant contributions when ηₑ exceeds 10³ (protons) or 10² (muons)

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Input:

• Intense laser field (circularly polarized monochromatic field, frequency ω, field strength ε₀)
• High-energy μ⁺ or proton beam (energy E_Lab, initial scattering angle θ_Lab)

Output:

• Scattering cross section for single fermion + invisible dark particle
• Sensitivity limits on dark particle coupling parameters

Process: μ⁺/P + n×ω → μ⁺/P + γ_D/a (n is the number of absorbed laser photons)

Theoretical Framework

1. Volkov States in Strong Fields

In electromagnetic potential field A^μ(φ), the solution to the Dirac equation for relativistic fermions is the Volkov state:

$\psi_{p,s}(x) = \left[1 + \frac{Qe\not{k}\not{A}}{2(k \cdot p)}\right] \frac{u(p,s)}{\sqrt{2q_0V}} e^{iF(q,s)}$

where the "effective momentum" is: $q^\mu = p^\mu + \frac{Q^2e^2a^2}{2k \cdot p}k^\mu$

satisfying the modified dispersion relation: $q^2 = m_f^2 + Q^2e^2a^2 = m_f^{*2}$

Here a = ε₀/ω, and m_f* is the "effective mass," automatically incorporating nonlinear effects from the laser field.

2. Dark Photon Production Amplitude

The lowest-order S-matrix element: $\mathcal{M}^{P\gamma_D} = ie\epsilon \frac{e^{i(k'+q'-q)\cdot x}e^{-i\Phi}}{\sqrt{2^3V^3q_0q'_0k'_0}} \bar{u}(p',s')\left[1 + \frac{e\not{A}\not{k}}{2k \cdot p'}\right]\not{\varepsilon}_D\left[1 + \frac{e\not{k}\not{A}}{2k \cdot p}\right]u(p,s)$

where ϵ is the kinetic mixing parameter and ε_D is the dark photon polarization vector.

3. Jacobi-Anger Expansion

The phase factor can be expanded as a Bessel function series: $e^{-i\Phi} = e^{-iz\sin(\phi-\phi_0)} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} J_n(z)e^{-in(\phi-\phi_0)}$

where: $z = e\sqrt{(a_1 \cdot y)^2 + (a_2 \cdot y)^2}, \quad y^\mu = \frac{p'^\mu}{k \cdot p'} - \frac{p^\mu}{k \cdot p}$

This naturally decomposes the amplitude into contributions from absorbing n laser photons.

4. Spin-Averaged Matrix Element Squared

Dark Photon: $\sum_{i,j}\tilde{C}_i^n(\tilde{C}_j^n)^* \mathcal{M}_i^{P\gamma_D}\mathcal{M}_j^{P\gamma_D\dagger} = -2(m_\chi^2 + 2m_P^2)J_n^2(z) + \frac{e^2a^2(1+u^2)}{u}[J_{n-1}^2(z) + J_{n+1}^2(z) - 2J_n^2(z)]$

ALP: $\sum_{i,j}\tilde{C}_i^n(\tilde{C}_j^n)^* \mathcal{M}_i^{Pa}\mathcal{M}_j^{Pa\dagger} = -4m_P^2m_\chi^2J_n^2(z) + \frac{e^2a^2 2m_P^2(1-u)^2}{u}[J_{n-1}^2(z) + J_{n+1}^2(z) - 2J_n^2(z)]$

where u ≡ (k·p)/(k·p').

5. Total Cross Section Formula

In the center-of-mass frame: $\sigma = \frac{\kappa^2}{32\pi q_0\rho_\omega}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\sum_{i,j}\tilde{C}_i^n(\tilde{C}_j^n)^*\overline{\mathcal{M}_i\mathcal{M}_j^\dagger}\int\frac{du}{u^2}$

where κ = eϵ (dark photon) or c_{aμ,aP}/(2f_a) (ALP), and ρ_ω = a²ω/(4π) is the laser photon density.

Technical Innovations

1. Exact Strong-Field Treatment: Using Volkov states rather than perturbative expansion, completely including all orders of ea/m_f, applicable to strong-field regime (ηₑ > 1)
2. Multi-Photon Nonlinear Effects: Systematically calculates multi-photon absorption contributions from n=1 to 6, revealing the step structure of cross sections
3. Nucleon-Level Effective Theory: For proton beams, matches quark-level weak interactions to nucleon level using form factors F₁^{q/P}(0), F₂^{q/P}(0), F_A^{q/P}(0), etc.
4. Helicity Amplitude Method: For neutrino backgrounds, employs density matrix decomposition technique, factorizing production and decay processes: $\mathcal{M}^{\nu P} = \sum_{\lambda=s,0,\pm1}\eta_\lambda \mathcal{M}_{P,\lambda}^{\nu P}\mathcal{M}_{D,\lambda}^{\nu P}$
5. Physical Approximations: Under the condition m²_{μ,P} ≫ ωE_Lab, s_n ≈ m²_{μ,P} and u ≈ 1, simplifying calculations and revealing physical essence

Experimental Setup

Laser Parameters

• Wavelength: Green light, ω = 2.35 eV (corresponding to 532 nm)
• Polarization: Circular polarization
• Field Type: Monochromatic plane wave (theoretical simplification; actual pulse shape is Gaussian)
• Strength Parameter: ηₑ = 0.1 to 10⁴

Beam Parameters

μ⁺ Beam:

• E_Lab = 3.1 GeV (reference FNAL g-2 experiment)
• E_Lab = 1 TeV, 10 TeV (future muon colliders)

Proton Beam:

• E_Lab = 8 GeV (reference FNAL accelerator)
• E_Lab = 1 TeV (Tevatron/LHC energy scale)
• E_Lab = 10 TeV (high-energy collider)

Initial Scattering Angle: θ_Lab = 17° (reference SLAC E144 experimental setup)

Dark Particle Parameters

• Mass Range: 10⁻⁹ GeV to 10⁰ GeV (focus on < 1 MeV)
• Dark Photon: Kinetic mixing ϵ as free parameter
• ALP: Coupling constants g_{aμ}, g_ as free parameters (setting c_{aμ} = c_ = 1)

Statistical Assumptions

• Integrated Luminosity: L = 1 ab⁻¹
• Significance Requirement: 3σ observation, using formula S/√(S+B)
• Signal: Single fermion + missing energy
• Background: μ⁺/P + nω → μ⁺/P + ν + ν̄

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Cross Section Behavior (Figures 1 and 2)

Dark Photon Production (m_{γD} = 10 eV, ϵ = 1):

• μ⁺ beam (3.1 GeV): σ ~ 10⁸-10¹² fb (ηₑ = 10⁰-10⁴)
• μ⁺ beam (1 TeV): Cross section values nearly identical (energy-independent characteristic)
• Proton beam (8 GeV): σ ~ 10⁷-10¹¹ fb
• Proton beam (1 TeV): Cross section similarly independent of energy

ALP Production (m_a = 10 eV, g_{aμ} = g_ = 1):

• μ⁺ beam (3.1 GeV): σ ~ 10⁻³-10² fb
• μ⁺ beam (1 TeV): σ ~ 10³-10⁷ fb (growth of ~10⁶ times)
• Proton beam (8 GeV): σ ~ 10⁻⁷-10⁻² fb
• Proton beam (1 TeV): σ ~ 10⁻³-10² fb

Nonlinear Effects:

• When ηₑ < 10² (muons) or 10³ (protons), n=1 dominates
• As ηₑ increases, n=2,3,4... gradually contribute, forming a step-like structure
• Total cross section (black solid line) shows smooth transition

2. Standard Model Background (Table I)

Background cross section σ_ is extremely small, for example:

• μ⁺ (3.1 GeV, ηₑ=0.1): 3.12×10⁻²⁸ fb
• μ⁺ (1 TeV, ηₑ=100): 1.12×10⁻¹⁵ fb
• P (8 GeV, ηₑ=0.1): 1.09×10⁻³¹ fb
• P (10 TeV, ηₑ=100): 3.53×10⁻¹⁶ fb

Conclusion: SM background is completely negligible, signal-to-background ratio is extremely high.

3. Sensitivity Projections (Figure 3)

Dark Photon Kinetic Mixing ϵ (left panel):

• μ⁺ Beam:
  • Achieves ϵ ~ 1.6×10⁻⁷ at all energies (10⁻⁹ < m_{γD} < 1 MeV)
  • Energy-independent, confirming theoretical expectations
  • Superior to BaBar, E137 in m_{γD} < 1 MeV region
  • Comparable to or better than Belle-II, BESIII, STCF expectations
• Proton Beam:
  • Sensitivity ϵ ~ 1.4×10⁻⁶
  • Approximately one order of magnitude weaker than μ⁺ beam (due to larger proton mass)
  • Still provides complementary detection in m_{γD} < 1 MeV

ALP Coupling g_{aμ} (upper right panel):

• E_Lab = 3.1 GeV: g_{aμ} ~ 5×10⁻² (m_a < 1 MeV)
• E_Lab = 1 TeV: g_{aμ} ~ 2×10⁻⁴ (improvement of 250 times)
• E_Lab = 10 TeV: g_{aμ} ~ 2×10⁻⁵ (further improvement of 10 times)
• Comparison with SN1987A: Superior when g_{aμ} > 10⁻²
• Comparison with NA64μ: Superior to NA64μ (2×10¹⁰ muons) by at least one order of magnitude at 1 TeV and 10 TeV energies

ALP Coupling g_ (lower right panel):

• All energies: g_ ~ 10⁻²-10³
• Three orders of magnitude weaker than g_{aμ} (reflecting proton composite structure)
• Complementarity: Fills parameter space between SNO and SN1987A (g_ > 1×10⁻²)

η_e Dependence:

• η_e = 0.1 (solid line) vs 100 (dashed line)
• Higher η_e can probe higher mass regions (threshold effect)
• For dark photons, increasing η_e mainly increases event rate
• For ALPs, increasing η_e simultaneously enhances mass coverage range

Ablation Studies

Although the paper does not explicitly label "ablation studies," the following analysis reveals the contribution of various factors:

1. Multi-Photon Contributions: Figures 1 and 2 separately display contributions from n=1 to 6, showing:
   • At low η_e, n=1 dominates (>90%)
   • At η_e > 10³, cumulative effects of n≤6 must be considered
2. Beam Energy: The energy dependence of ALP cross section originates from the (1-u)² term, where the degree of u deviation from 1 is determined by ωE_Lab/m*²
3. Particle Type: The μ⁺ vs proton comparison demonstrates the importance of mass effects

Physical Insights

1. Energy Independence (Dark Photon):
   • Under the m*² ≫ ωE_Lab approximation, u≈1
   • Energy-dependent terms in the matrix element squared cancel
   • Physically: dark photon production is dominated by virtual photon propagator, insensitive to center-of-mass energy
2. Energy Enhancement (ALP):
   • The (1-u)² factor is energy-sensitive
   • High-energy beams make u closer to 1, but the squared deviation still grows
   • Physically: ALP's pseudo-scalar coupling ∂_μa f̄γ^μγ⁵f is sensitive to momentum transfer
3. Nonlinear Threshold:
   • η_e ~ m_f/m_e is the characteristic scale
   • Beyond this threshold, strong-field non-perturbative effects become significant
   • The oscillatory structure of Bessel functions J_n(z) produces multi-photon resonances

Related Work

Strong-Field QED Experiments

1. SLAC E144 (1997-1999): First observation of nonlinear Compton scattering and Breit-Wheeler pair production 3,4
2. LUXE Experiment: Planned strong-field QED experiment at DESY 66

Dark Photon Searches

1. Colliders:
   • BaBar (B-meson factory): e⁺e⁻ → γγ_D 72
   • Belle-II: Similar strategy, expected higher luminosity 75
   • BESIII, STCF: τ-charm factory searches 76
2. Fixed-Target/Beam Dump:
   • E137 (SLAC): Electron beam dump 73
   • NA64 (CERN): Electron and muon beams 74
3. Advantages of This Work:
   • Complementary in low-mass region (< 1 MeV)
   • Exploits strong-field enhancement of cross sections
   • Clear missing energy signal

ALP Searches

1. Astrophysical Constraints:
   • SN1987A: Supernova cooling 68,70
   • SNO: Solar neutrino experiment 71
2. Laboratory Searches:
   • NA64μ: Muon beam dump 69
   • (g-2)_μ: Anomalous magnetic moment 2σ band 77
3. Advantages of This Work:
   • Superior to NA64μ at TeV energies
   • Superior to SN1987A when g_{aμ} > 10⁻²
   • Proton beam provides independent probe

Laser-Particle Collisions

1. Theoretical Studies:
   • Ritus (1972): Scattering theory in strong fields 17
   • Dillon & King (2018): First proposal of laser-electron dark photon production 7,8
   • King et al. (2019): Dark scalar searches 11
2. Muon Strong-Field Physics:
   • Becker et al. (1983): Muon decay in strong fields 18
   • Tizchang et al. (2017): Laser-muon exploration of new physics 24
3. Innovations of This Work:
   • First systematic study of muon/proton beams
   • Complete ALP production calculation
   • Detailed background analysis

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Method Feasibility: Nonlinear Compton scattering from intense laser collisions with high-energy muon/proton beams provides a new pathway for detecting light dark matter particles
2. Quantitative Expectations:
   • Dark photon: ϵ ~ 10⁻⁷-10⁻⁶ (mass < 1 MeV)
   • ALP-muon: g_{aμ} ~ 10⁻⁵-10⁻² (depending on beam energy)
   • ALP-proton: g_ ~ 10⁻²-10³
3. Complementarity: Fills detection blind spots in low-mass regions of existing experiments, forming a complementary network with colliders, beam dumps, and astrophysical constraints
4. Physical Discoveries:
   • Nonlinear effects become significant when η_e > 10² (muons) or 10³ (protons)
   • Dark photon production is independent of beam energy
   • ALP production cross section grows with energy
   • SM background is completely negligible

Limitations

1. Theoretical Simplifications:
   • Employs monochromatic plane wave approximation; actual laser pulses have Gaussian spatial distribution
   • Neglects Fourier transform effects of pulse shape function f(x)
   • Does not account for beam emittance and laser focusing effects
2. Experimental Challenges:
   • Requires extremely high laser intensity (η_e > 100)
   • Experimental simulation of missing energy events beyond paper scope
   • Lacks detailed discussion of detector design and trigger strategies
   • 1 ab⁻¹ integrated luminosity requires long-term operation
3. Parameter Space:
   • Limited to m_χ < 2m_e ≈ 1 MeV (long-lifetime assumption)
   • Heavier dark particles may decay within detector, requiring different analysis
   • Does not consider dark photon-dark matter portal scenarios
4. Model Dependence:
   • Dark photon considers only kinetic mixing mechanism
   • ALP assumes simple derivative coupling, not other operators
   • Proton form factor at q²=0 approximation may introduce ~10% error

Future Directions

1. Experimental Implementation:
   • Collaboration with strong-field QED experiments like LUXE
   • Implementation at future muon collider facilities
   • Development of dedicated laser-proton collision apparatus
2. Theoretical Improvements:
   • Include complete spacetime structure of laser pulses
   • Study polarization effects and spin correlations
   • Calculate next-to-leading order QED corrections
3. Extended Models:
   • Dark scalars, dark pseudoscalars
   • Sterile neutrinos
   • Light mesons (e.g., π⁰ → γγ_D)
4. Synergistic Detection:
   • Combine data from different beam energies
   • Joint analysis with other low-energy precision experiments
   • Utilize multi-messenger astrophysical constraints

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Originality:
   • Novel Scheme: First systematic proposal of laser-muon/proton collision for dark matter detection, opening new experimental directions
   • Complete Theory: Exact strong-field QED calculation based on Volkov states, not perturbative approximation
   • Multi-Particle Comparison: Simultaneous study of dark photons and ALPs, revealing physical differences in coupling mechanisms
2. Technical Rigor:
   • Exact Calculation: Jacobi-Anger expansion handling multi-photon absorption, including complete contributions from n=1-6
   • Background Analysis: Detailed calculation of W/Z-mediated SM processes, proving background negligibility
   • Nucleon Matching: Proper treatment of quark-nucleon level effective theory matching (form factors)
3. Result Credibility:
   • Physical Consistency: Dark photon energy independence and ALP energy dependence have clear physical explanations
   • Numerical Stability: Results smoothly continuous across different η_e and energies
   • Sufficient Comparison: Comparison with 10+ existing/future experimental limits
4. Clear Expression:
   • Logical structure, progressing from fundamental theory to applications
   • Information-rich figures (6 multi-panel plots)
   • Detailed but non-redundant mathematical derivations

Weaknesses

1. Insufficient Experimental Feasibility Discussion:
   • Laser Parameters: Achieving η_e=100 requires I~10²⁴ W/cm², while current strongest lasers ~10²³ W/cm², marginal feasibility
   • Beam-Laser Synchronization: Picosecond laser pulses with nanosecond beam bunches pose temporal-spatial overlap challenges
   • Detector Design: Missing energy measurement requires hermetic calorimeter; cost and technical details not addressed
   • Luminosity Estimate: 1 ab⁻¹ corresponds to ~10¹⁵ collisions; laser repetition rate and beam intensity realism needs evaluation
2. Theoretical Approximations:
   • Monochromatic Approximation: Actual pulse spectral width may alter threshold behavior
   • Plane Wave: Laser focusing-induced spatial field distribution ignored
   • Tree-Level: Loop corrections not discussed (e.g., vacuum polarization renormalization of ϵ)
   • Proton Structure: Only leading terms of vector and axial-vector currents retained; tensor current contribution not assessed
3. Limited Parameter Scanning:
   • Only m_χ=10 eV cross section shown; other mass behavior requires interpolation
   • θ_Lab fixed at 17°; angular dependence unexplored
   • Laser wavelength fixed (green light); optimization for other wavelengths (e.g., infrared) not discussed
4. Systematic Uncertainties:
   • Form factor uncertainty (e.g., Δu_P=0.897±0.027) propagation to sensitivity not quantified
   • Strong-field QED theoretical uncertainty (high-order term truncation) not estimated
   • Experimental errors (beam energy resolution, laser intensity fluctuations) not incorporated
5. Comparison with Other Methods:
   • No comparison with photon-photon scattering (photon-photon fusion) schemes
   • Lacks efficiency comparison with traditional colliders (e.g., μ⁺μ⁻ → γ_D/a + γ)
   • Cost-benefit analysis missing

Impact

1. Academic Contribution:
   • Interdisciplinary: Connects strong-field QED, particle physics, and dark matter detection
   • Methodology: Volkov state application in new physics searches generalizable to other scenarios
   • Benchmark Calculation: Provides theoretical predictions for future experiments; expected high citation rate
2. Practical Value:
   • Short-term: Can be incorporated into physics objectives of planned experiments like LUXE
   • Medium-term: Provides motivation for low-energy physics programs at future muon colliders
   • Long-term: Signal discovery would revolutionize dark matter research
3. Limitations:
   • High Technical Threshold: Requires multi-facility coordination (PW laser + TeV accelerator)
   • Long Timescale: Concept to implementation may require 10-20 years
   • Intense Competition: Other methods (ALPS-II, IAXO) may achieve similar sensitivity faster
4. Reproducibility:
   • Theory: Complete formulas enable independent calculation reproduction
   • Numerics: Code not publicly available, but Bessel function calculations standard and easily reproducible
   • Experiment: Parameters explicit (ω=2.35 eV, θ_Lab=17°, etc.), usable as experimental design input

Applicable Scenarios

1. Optimal Scenarios:
   • Mass Range: 10 keV < m_χ < 1 MeV (avoiding low-mass cosmological constraints and high-mass collider advantages)
   • Coupling Strength: 10⁻⁷ < ϵ < 10⁻⁴ (dark photon), 10⁻⁵ < g_{aμ} < 10⁻¹ (ALP)
   • Facilities: PW laser-equipped muon/proton accelerators (e.g., upgraded FNAL or future muon colliders)
2. Complementary Scenarios:
   • Cross-verification with BaBar/Belle-II in m_{γD} < 1 MeV
   • Fills ALP parameter space between NA64μ and SN1987A
   • Laboratory verification for astrophysical anomalies (e.g., 3.5 keV line)
3. Challenging Scenarios:
   • m_χ < 10 keV: Reduced cross section, requires higher luminosity
   • m_χ > 1 MeV: Dark particle may decay, requires different detection strategy
   • Extremely weak coupling (ϵ < 10⁻⁸): Event rate too low, needs ab⁻¹+ integrated luminosity
4. Extended Applications:
   • Proton Beam: Though weaker sensitivity than muons, can probe quark-coupled new physics (e.g., dark gluons)
   • Heavy-Ion Beams: Nuclear effects may enhance certain processes
   • Polarized Beams: Spin-dependent signals can distinguish different models

Key References

1. Schwinger (1951): Pioneering work on QED vacuum polarization, establishing critical field strength concept
2. SLAC E144 (1997-1999): First experimental observation, validating strong-field QED theory
3. Fedotov et al. (2023): Comprehensive strong-field QED review, providing modern theoretical framework
4. Holdom (1986): Original proposal of dark photon kinetic mixing
5. Di Luzio et al. (2020): Authoritative ALP physics review
6. Dillon & King (2018): Pioneering work on laser-electron dark photon production; direct inspiration for this paper
7. Bishara et al. (2017): Modern determination of nucleon form factors; key input for background calculation

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical physics paper proposing an innovative dark matter detection scheme with rigorous calculations and credible results. Its main value lies in opening an interdisciplinary field combining strong-field QED and dark matter searches, providing clear theoretical predictions for future experiments. Main shortcomings include insufficient experimental feasibility justification, requiring further evaluation by experimental physicists. Recommended follow-up work includes: (1) collaboration with LUXE and similar experiments for detailed detector simulations; (2) optimization of laser and beam parameters to maximize signal-to-noise ratio; (3) extension to other dark matter candidates (dark scalars, sterile neutrinos). This work is expected to generate significant impact in the strong-field physics and dark matter communities.