Where is the Entropy in DSSYK-de Sitter? Correction to a wrong claim

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2511.10907
• Title: Where is the Entropy in DSSYK-de Sitter? Correction to a wrong claim
• Author: Leonard Susskind (Stanford University & Google)
• Classification: hep-th (High Energy Physics - Theory)
• Publication Date: November 14, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10907

Abstract

This paper is Leonard Susskind's correction of a serious error in his previous work. The core question is: at what distance from the mathematical horizon is entropy stored in the holographic description of de Sitter space? The author previously claimed in multiple papers and a Stony Brook lecture that entropy in DSSYK/JT-de Sitter is stored at a distance of one string length from the horizon. This conclusion was based on a misunderstanding of the confinement-deconfinement phase transition in the 't Hooft model. After correction, the correct answer is that entropy is stored at the Planck distance scale, which differs from the string distance by a factor of approximately $\sqrt{N}$.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

In the holographic description of de Sitter space, particularly in the DSSYK∞/JT-de Sitter correspondence, a fundamental question arises: at what location on the stretched horizon is the horizon entropy actually stored?

Importance of the Problem

1. Implementation of the Holographic Principle: Understanding the spatial distribution of entropy is crucial for comprehending the holographic description of de Sitter space
2. Microscopic Structure of Quantum Gravity: The location where entropy is stored directly relates to the physical mechanisms of quantum gravity at the Planck or string scale
3. Phase Transition Physics: Involves the correct understanding of confinement-deconfinement phase transitions in two-dimensional QCD (the 't Hooft model)

Previous Misunderstanding

The author made a conceptual error in previous work:

• Incorrect Assumption: Equating the confinement-deconfinement phase transition temperature in the 't Hooft model with the QCD scale Λ (the string mass scale)
• Incorrect Conclusion: Believing that entropy is stored in a region approximately one string length $\ell_{string}$ from the horizon
• Root of the Problem: Directly applying four-dimensional QCD physics to two-dimensional QCD while ignoring the critical differences due to dimensionality

Research Motivation

The author noticed a troubling issue in lectures: in the DSSYK∞/JT-de Sitter correspondence, the string scale plays a prominent role, but the Planck length barely appears. This prompted the author to re-examine the theoretical framework, ultimately discovering and correcting this error.

Core Contributions

The main contributions of this paper include:

1. Correction of a Major Conceptual Error: Clearly stating that in the 't Hooft model, the confinement-deconfinement phase transition temperature is not $T_c = \Lambda$, but rather $T_c = \Lambda\sqrt{N}$
2. Redetermination of Entropy Storage Location: Proving that the stretched horizon is at a Planck scale distance from the mathematical horizon, not a string scale distance: $\rho_{sh} = T_c^{-1} = g_{open}^{-1}\ell_{planck}$
3. Establishment of a Unified Theoretical Framework: Revealing the parallel relationship between the 't Hooft model (open string theory) and high-dimensional closed string theory:
   • 't Hooft model: $T_c = g_{open}M_{planck}$
   • Closed string theory: $T_c = g_{closed}M_{planck}$
4. Clarification of Scale Relations: Elucidating the enormous difference between the Planck scale and string scale in two-dimensional theory (differing by a factor of $\sqrt{N}$), which is not significant in high-dimensional string theory

Detailed Methodology

Theoretical Framework: DSSYK∞/JT-de Sitter Correspondence

This paper is based on the correspondence between the double-scaled SYK (Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev) model and de Sitter space, with particular focus on the Rindler wedge region in the flat space limit.

Scale Hierarchy Structure

The author first clarifies multiple energy/mass scales in the theory (as shown in Figure 1):

Fundamental Scale Relations: $M_{micro} = \sqrt{M_{planck}M_{min}} = M_{Planck}/\sqrt{N}$

$\frac{M_{planck}}{M_{min}} = N$

$M_{string} = \sqrt{\lambda}M_{micro} = \frac{\sqrt{\lambda}}{\sqrt{N}}M_{Planck}$

Where:

• $M_{min}$: Minimum scale (Gibbons-Hawking temperature)
• $M_{micro}$: Microscopic scale (geometric mean of $M_{max}$ and $M_{min}$)
• $M_{string}$: String scale
• $M_{planck}$: Planck scale
• $\lambda$: DSSYK parameter

Clarification of Coupling Constants

The author first clarifies confusion in notation conventions:

Open and Closed String Couplings: $\lambda = g_{open}^2 \quad \text{(Equation 1.1)}$

$g_{closed} = g_{open}^2 \quad \text{(Equation 1.2)}$

The key insight here is recognizing that the 't Hooft model is pure open string theory, containing no closed strings. Equation (1.2) in the 't Hooft model is merely a definition, but in complete string theory it correctly relates open and closed string couplings.

Correct Calculation of Phase Transition Temperature

Incorrect Old View (author's previous understanding):

• Phase transition temperature: $T_c = \Lambda = M_{string}$
• Stretched horizon location: $\rho_{sh} \sim \ell_{string}$
• Physical picture: In the region $\rho < \ell_{string}$ quarks are deconfined with entropy $O(N)$; in the cold region entropy is $O(1)$

Correct New Understanding (based on McLerran-Sen results 5):

The confinement-deconfinement phase transition temperature in two-dimensional QCD (the 't Hooft model) is: $T_c = \Lambda\sqrt{N} \quad \text{(Equation 2.1)}$

This is higher than the string scale temperature by a parametric factor of $\sqrt{N}$.

Derivation of Planck Scale Conclusion

Using scale relations (1.3) and (2.2): $M_{string} = \sqrt{\lambda}M_{micro} = \frac{\sqrt{\lambda}}{\sqrt{N}}M_{planck}$

Combined with $\lambda = g_{open}^2$: $T_c = \Lambda\sqrt{N} = M_{string}\sqrt{N} = \frac{\sqrt{\lambda}}{\sqrt{N}}M_{planck} \cdot \sqrt{N} = g_{open}M_{planck}$

Therefore, the location of the stretched horizon is: $\rho_{sh} = T_c^{-1} = g_{open}^{-1}\ell_{planck} \quad \text{(Equation 2.4)}$

Key Physical Insights

When $g_{open} \sim 1$, the Planck scale naturally emerges as the scale at which horizon entropy is stored. This result:

1. Appears reasonable in hindsight: Quantum gravity effects manifest at the Planck scale
2. Non-trivial derivation: Naturally obtained through the statistical mechanics of the 't Hooft model
3. Reveals deeper connections: Links two-dimensional QCD statistical physics with quantum gravity

Comparison with String Theory

High-Dimensional Closed String Theory

In high-dimensional string theory containing genuine closed strings:

• Hagedorn phase transition occurs at $T_c = M_{string}$
• But the string scale and Planck scale are parametrically identical: $M_{string} = g_{closed}M_{planck} \quad \text{(Equation 3.1)}$

Therefore: $T_c = g_{closed}M_{planck} \quad \text{(Equation 3.2)}$

Parallelism of Theories

Comparing equations (2.3) and (3.2):

• 't Hooft Model (open strings): $T_c = g_{open}M_{planck}$
• Closed String Theory: $T_c = g_{closed}M_{planck}$

Similarities: The forms are identical, both relating phase transition temperature to the Planck scale Differences: Open string coupling vs. closed string coupling, reflecting the open string nature of the 't Hooft model

Critical Dimensional Effects

• High-dimensional string theory: $M_{string}$ and $M_{planck}$ are parametrically identical (differing by $g_{closed}$)
• Two-dimensional 't Hooft model: $M_{string}$ and $M_{planck}$ differ by an enormous factor of $\sqrt{N}$

This explains why distinguishing these two scales is crucial in the two-dimensional case.

Experimental Setup

This is purely theoretical work with no numerical experiments or experimental data. It primarily involves conceptual clarification and theoretical derivation.

Theoretical Verification Basis

• McLerran-Sen Results 5: Provide rigorous calculations of two-dimensional large-N QCD thermodynamics, yielding $T_c = \Lambda\sqrt{N}$
• 't Hooft Model 3: Classical results for the two-dimensional meson model
• Scale Relations: Derived from the DSSYK theoretical framework 1,2,4

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

Core Correction:

Old conclusion: ρ_sh ~ ℓ_string ~ (√λ/√N) ℓ_planck
New conclusion: ρ_sh ~ ℓ_planck / g_open

When $g_{open} \sim O(1)$, the two differ by a factor of $\sqrt{N}$.

Changes in Physical Picture

Old Picture (Incorrect):

• Blue curve (Figure 2) marks the phase boundary at distance $\ell_{string}$ from the horizon
• In region $\rho < \ell_{string}$: quarks are deconfined with entropy $\sim O(N)$
• In region $\rho > \ell_{string}$: quarks are confined with entropy $\sim O(1)$

New Picture (Correct):

• Phase boundary actually lies at distance $\ell_{planck}/g_{open}$ from the horizon
• This is a Planck scale phenomenon, not a string scale phenomenon
• The enormous horizon entropy is stored in the Planck scale region

Unified Theoretical Framework

The phase transition temperature in both theories is unified as: $T_c = g \cdot M_{planck}$

Where:

• $g = g_{open}$ (in the 't Hooft model)
• $g = g_{closed}$ (in closed string theory)

This reveals a deeper symmetry: regardless of whether we consider open or closed string theory, the phase transition is a Planck scale phenomenon, with only the definition of the coupling constant differing.

Related Work

Author's Previous Work

1. 1 Sekino & Susskind (2025): Double-Scaled SYK, QCD and the Flat Space Limit of de Sitter
2. 2 Miyashita, Sekino & Susskind (2025): DSSYK at Infinite Temperature and the 't Hooft Model
3. 4 Susskind (2025): de Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK and Scale Separation in the Semiclassical Limit

These works established the basic framework of the DSSYK/JT-de Sitter correspondence but contained the errors corrected in this paper.

Key References

• 3 't Hooft (1974): Pioneering work on the two-dimensional meson model, establishing large-N two-dimensional QCD
• 5 McLerran & Sen (1985): Thermodynamics of QCD in the large-N limit, providing the crucial $T_c = \Lambda\sqrt{N}$ result

Theoretical Background

• Holographic Principle: Microscopic origin of black hole/de Sitter horizon entropy
• Large-N Gauge Theory: 't Hooft's large-N expansion and its connection to string theory
• SYK Model: Important toy model for studying quantum gravity and holography in recent years
• Double-Scaled Limit: Taking limits under specific relationships between large N and strong coupling

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Correction of Error: In the 't Hooft model, the confinement-deconfinement phase transition temperature is not $\Lambda$ (string scale) but rather $\Lambda\sqrt{N}$, higher by a parametric factor of $\sqrt{N}$
2. Correct Location of Entropy: The stretched horizon is at a Planck scale distance from the mathematical horizon: $\rho_{sh} = g_{open}^{-1}\ell_{planck} \approx \ell_{planck} \quad (g_{open} \sim 1)$
3. Central Role of Planck Scale: The enormous horizon entropy is a Planck scale phenomenon in both cases:
   • 't Hooft model: $T_c = g_{open}M_{planck}$
   • Closed string theory: $T_c = g_{closed}M_{planck}$
4. Importance of Scale Differences: In two-dimensional theory, the Planck scale and string scale differ by $\sqrt{N}$, which is not significant in high-dimensional string theory but is crucial in the two-dimensional case

Physical Significance

Why is it the Planck Scale?

• Quantum gravity effects are fundamentally Planck scale phenomena
• Horizon entropy, as a core feature of quantum gravity, naturally should be related to the Planck scale
• Through the statistical mechanics of two-dimensional QCD, this point is verified in a non-trivial manner

Open Strings vs. Closed Strings:

• The pure open string nature of the 't Hooft model is reflected in the appearance of $g_{open}$
• The parallel relationship with closed string theory reveals a deeper unity
• The relation $g_{closed} = g_{open}^2$ correctly encodes the open-closed string correspondence

Limitations

1. Approximation: Assumes $g_{open} \sim 1$; actual values may deviate
2. Model Dependence: Conclusions are based on the 't Hooft model and DSSYK framework; generalization to other cases requires caution
3. Two-Dimensional Specificity: Two-dimensional QCD has special properties; generalization to higher dimensions is non-trivial
4. Large-N Limit: Conclusions are rigorous in the large-N limit; finite-N corrections are not discussed

Future Directions

Although this paper is primarily corrective in nature, it suggests several research directions:

1. Microscopic Mechanism: What are the specific microscopic degrees of freedom storing entropy at the Planck scale?
2. Finite-N Effects: How do $1/N$ corrections modify the picture?
3. Higher-Dimensional Generalization: How does this picture generalize to higher-dimensional de Sitter space?
4. Microscopic Structure of Quantum Gravity: Can more information about quantum gravity be extracted from DSSYK?

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Academic Integrity: Susskind publicly corrects his own errors, exemplifying scientific integrity. This sets a good example in the high-energy theory community
2. Conceptual Clarity: Despite being a correction paper, the author clearly explains:
   • The source of the error (confusion between four-dimensional and two-dimensional QCD phase transition properties)
   • The correct derivation process
   • Changes in the physical picture
3. Profound Insights: The corrected result is actually more natural and profound:
   • Planck scale as the fundamental scale of quantum gravity
   • Unified framework for open/closed string theories
   • Importance of dimensional effects
4. Mathematical Rigor: Based on rigorous McLerran-Sen results with clear logical derivation
5. Educational Value: Through the contrast between error and correction, readers can gain deeper understanding of:
   • Differences between two-dimensional and high-dimensional QCD
   • Importance of scale separation
   • Subtleties in holographic correspondence

Weaknesses

1. Lack of New Physics Predictions: This paper is primarily corrective and does not propose testable new predictions
2. Limited Technical Details:
   • No detailed derivation of McLerran-Sen results
   • Insufficient explanation of the physical mechanism behind $T_c = \Lambda\sqrt{N}$
   • The assumption $g_{open} \sim 1$ lacks justification
3. Unclear Scope of Applicability:
   • What are the implications for other aspects of DSSYK?
   • Does this affect other published results?
   • Which conclusions need re-examination?
4. Insufficient Illustration:
   • Figure 2 shows the old (incorrect) picture
   • Lacks a new figure showing the correct picture
   • Comparison would be more pedagogical
5. Brief Literature Review: Limited background and subsequent developments of McLerran-Sen work

Impact Assessment

Impact on Theoretical Physics:

1. Correction of DSSYK Research Direction: All research based on Susskind's previous work needs re-examination
2. Reinforcement of Planck Scale's Central Role: In quantum gravity and holography
3. Clarification of Conceptual Confusion: Helps the community avoid similar errors

Practical Value:

• Pure theoretical work with no direct practical applications
• But crucial for understanding fundamental questions in quantum gravity and holography

Reproducibility:

• Derivations based on published McLerran-Sen results
• Clear logic, easy to verify
• Highly reproducible

Long-Term Significance:

• Important milestone in the history of DSSYK/de Sitter holography
• Demonstrates the importance of conceptual clarity in theoretical physics
• May inspire further research on two-dimensional/high-dimensional theory differences

Applicable Scenarios

The results and methods in this paper apply to:

1. DSSYK Theory Research: All work involving DSSYK/JT-de Sitter correspondence
2. de Sitter Holography: Understanding the microscopic structure of de Sitter space
3. Two-Dimensional QCD Research: Thermodynamics and phase transitions in the large-N limit
4. Black Hole Physics: Microscopic understanding of the stretched horizon
5. Quantum Gravity Phenomenology: Model studies of Planck scale physics

Inapplicable Scenarios:

• Precise calculations beyond the large-N limit
• High-dimensional QCD (different phase transition properties)
• Weak coupling regime (conclusions need modification when $g_{open} \ll 1$)

References

Key references cited in this paper:

1. 1 Sekino & Susskind (2025): "Double-Scaled SYK, QCD, and the Flat Space Limit of de Sitter Space", arXiv:2501.09423
2. 2 Miyashita, Sekino & Susskind (2025): "DSSYK at Infinite Temperature: The Flat-Space Limit and the 't Hooft Model", arXiv:2506.18054
3. 3 't Hooft (1974): "A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons", Nucl. Phys. B 75, 461-470 - Pioneering work on large-N two-dimensional QCD
4. 4 Susskind (2025): "De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit", JHAP 5, 1-30, arXiv:2209.09999
5. 5 McLerran & Sen (1985): "Thermodynamics of QCD in the Large N Limit", Phys. Rev. D 32, 2794 - Key basis for the correction in this paper

Summary Comments

This is a rare academic correction paper that reveals the real process of theoretical physics research. Leonard Susskind, a leading figure in the field, publicly acknowledges and corrects systematic errors in multiple papers and lectures, demonstrating commendable academic integrity.

Core Lesson: Field theories in different dimensions have fundamental differences and cannot be simply analogized. The confinement-deconfinement phase transition in four-dimensional QCD occurs at $T \sim \Lambda$, but in two-dimensional QCD, due to the $\sqrt{N}$ factor, it occurs at the higher temperature $T \sim \Lambda\sqrt{N}$. This seemingly technical difference leads to a fundamental misunderstanding of where horizon entropy is stored.

Deeper Significance: The corrected picture is actually more satisfying—the core phenomenon of quantum gravity (horizon entropy) should indeed be a Planck scale phenomenon, not a string scale phenomenon. This is verified through rigorous calculations in two-dimensional QCD statistical mechanics, demonstrating profound connections between different areas of physics.

For researchers working on DSSYK and de Sitter holography, this paper is essential reading, as it corrects a fundamental understanding in the field.