Application of optical squeezing to microresonator based optical sensors

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2511.12138
• Title: Application of optical squeezing to microresonator based optical sensors
• Authors: Dariya Salykina, Daniil Shakhbaziants, Igor Bilenko, Farid Ya. Khalili
• Institutions: M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russian Quantum Center, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: November 15, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.12138v1

Abstract

High-Q optical microresonators combine low loss with high optical energy concentration within small mode volumes, making them ideal platforms for optical sensors. When light is confined within microresonators through total internal reflection, a portion of the optical field (evanescent field) extends externally, rendering the mode's resonant frequency sensitive to environmental changes.

This study explores the quantum sensitivity limits of such sensors. The research demonstrates that by preparing the probe light in a squeezed quantum state, one can surpass the shot-noise limit. The ultimate sensitivity is limited only by optical losses and available squeezing. By additionally employing optical squeezing within the microresonator cavity, the impact of optical losses can be further reduced.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Research Problem

This paper addresses the quantum sensitivity limits of microresonator-based optical sensors, particularly how to exploit quantum optical techniques to surpass the classical shot-noise limit (SNL).

2. Problem Significance

• Application Value: Microresonator sensors have important applications in biosensing, chemical reaction analysis, single-molecule detection, and related fields
• Quantum Limits: The sensitivity of optical phase measurements is fundamentally constrained by quantum shot noise, limiting sensor performance under low-light conditions
• Practical Needs: In applications such as biological sample detection, maintaining high sensitivity and measurement speed while avoiding photodamage is essential

3. Limitations of Existing Methods

• Classical Method Limitations: Traditional approaches using coherent light sources cannot surpass the shot-noise limit
• Loss Sensitivity: Even with squeezed light, its advantages are highly sensitive to optical losses (particularly detection efficiency)
• Coupling Loss: Coupling between the microresonator and input-output paths is a significant loss source that is difficult to compensate through external methods

4. Research Motivation

• Extend the scheme in Ref. 25 for quantum non-demolition (QND) measurements to general microresonator frequency sensing
• Systematically investigate how input squeezing and intracavity squeezing enhance sensor performance
• Provide practically feasible quantum-enhanced sensing schemes

Core Contributions

1. Theoretical Framework: Establishes a complete theoretical model for quantum-enhanced optical sensors based on microresonators, including self-phase modulation (SPM), cross-phase modulation, and parametric excitation effects
2. Three-Scheme Comparison: Systematically derives and compares quantum noise spectral densities for three configurations:
   • Classical scheme without squeezing
   • Scheme using only input squeezed light
   • Dual-squeezing scheme combining input and intracavity squeezing
3. Optimization Strategy: Proposes a method to eliminate adverse self-phase modulation effects by adjusting the intracavity parametric excitation phase, providing analytical expressions for optimal parametric excitation strength
4. Performance Analysis: Demonstrates that squeezed light can surpass the shot-noise limit over a broad frequency band exceeding the microresonator bandwidth, with sensitivity limited only by optical losses and available squeezing
5. Practical Parameter Estimation: Provides specific parameter estimates for practical applications (e.g., quality factor Q=10⁹, bandwidth κ'/(2π)≈1.6 MHz)

Detailed Methods

Task Definition

Input: Small time-varying perturbations ξ(t) of the microresonator's intrinsic frequency, satisfying |ξ| ≪ ω₀

Output: Reconstruct frequency perturbation signals through heterodyne detection of probe light phase

Constraints:

• Linear approximation (small signals, quantum fluctuations)
• Steady-state operation (classical amplitude independent of time)
• Loss model (output channel efficiency η, internal loss rate κ'')

Model Architecture

1. System Hamiltonian

The system is described by the Hamiltonian (Equation 2):

$\frac{\hat{H}}{\hbar} = (\omega_o + \xi)\hat{a}^\dagger\hat{a} - \frac{\gamma}{2}\hat{a}^{\dagger 2}\hat{a}^2 + i\frac{k}{2}(\hat{a}^{\dagger 2}e^{-2i\omega't-i\phi} - \hat{a}^2e^{2i\omega't+i\phi}) + \text{coupling terms}$

Where:

• First term: Mode energy and frequency perturbation
• Second term: Self-phase modulation (Kerr nonlinearity, coefficient γ)
• Third term: Intracavity parametric excitation (coefficient k, phase φ)
• Coupling terms: Describe coupling with input-output fields and losses

2. Heisenberg-Langevin Equations

In the rotating frame (frequency ω'), the system dynamics are described by (Equation 7):

$\frac{d\hat{a}}{dt} + \kappa\hat{a} + i(\omega_o + \xi - \omega')\hat{a} - i\gamma\hat{a}^\dagger\hat{a}^2 - k\hat{a}^\dagger e^{-i\phi} = \sqrt{2\kappa'}\hat{b} + \sqrt{2\kappa''}\hat{v}$

Where:

• κ = κ' + κ'': Total half-bandwidth (κ' from coupling, κ'' from internal loss)
• $\hat{b}$: Input field operator
• $\hat{v}$: Internal loss noise operator

3. Linearization

Decompose operators into classical amplitude and quantum fluctuations: $\hat{a}(t) = \alpha + \hat{a}(t), \quad \hat{b}(t) = \beta + \hat{b}(t)$

Choose rotating frequency to eliminate Kerr frequency shift in classical terms: $\omega' = \omega_o - \gamma\beta^2$

Introduce two-photon quadratures: $\hat{X}_c = \frac{\hat{a} + \hat{a}^\dagger}{\sqrt{2}}, \quad \hat{X}_s = \frac{\hat{a} - \hat{a}^\dagger}{i\sqrt{2}}$

4. SPM Elimination Condition

By setting the sine component of parametric excitation (Equation 14): $k_s = k\sin\phi = 2\gamma\beta^2$

One can eliminate the self-phase modulation effect on the sine component, yielding simplified dynamics (Equation 15).

5. Output Measurement Model

Considering output losses (quantum efficiency η), the effective measurement signal is (Equation 18): $d_s(\Omega) = G(\Omega)\xi(\Omega) + \hat{N}_s(\Omega)$

Where the gain factor is: $G(\Omega) = -\frac{2\sqrt{\eta\kappa'}\beta}{-i\Omega + \kappa + k_c}$

Total noise is (Equation 20): $\hat{N}_s(\Omega) = \sqrt{\eta}\frac{(i\Omega + \kappa' - \kappa'' - k_c)\hat{b}_s(\Omega) + 2\sqrt{\kappa'\kappa''}\hat{v}_s(\Omega)}{-i\Omega + \kappa + k_c} + \sqrt{1-\eta}\hat{n}_s(\Omega)$

Technical Innovations

1. Dual-Squeezing Strategy

• Input Squeezing: Prepare probe light in a squeezed state (squeezing parameter r) to reduce input quantum noise
• Intracavity Squeezing: Generate additional squeezing or anti-squeezing within the cavity through parametric excitation (cosine component k_c)

2. Adaptive Optimization

Optimal intracavity parametric excitation strength depends on the relative magnitude of input noise and output loss (Equation 29): $k_c = \frac{(\kappa' - \kappa'')e^{-2r} - \epsilon^2\kappa}{e^{-2r} + \epsilon^2}$

Where $\epsilon^2 = (1-\eta)/\eta$ characterizes output loss.

• When input noise dominates (e^{-2r} > ε²): k_c > 0 (squeeze measurement component)
• When output loss dominates (e^{-2r} < ε²): k_c < 0 (anti-squeeze measurement component)

3. Distinction from Existing Schemes

• Compared to Ref. 23: First application of intracavity squeezing to the squeezed measurement component
• Compared to Ref. 25: Generalization from QND measurement to general frequency sensing with broader applicability
• Compared to classical schemes: Surpasses shot-noise limit and achieves quantum enhancement over broad frequency bands

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Calculation Parameters

This is a purely theoretical work without actual experiments, but provides typical parameter estimates:

Microresonator Parameters:

• Intrinsic quality factor: Q = ω₀/(2κ'') = 10⁹
• Intrinsic frequency: ω₀ ≈ 2×10¹⁵ s⁻¹ (wavelength λ = 1064 nm)
• Coupling to loss ratio: κ' = 10κ''
• Bandwidth: κ'/(2π) ≈ 1.6 MHz

Quantum Optical Parameters:

• Output quantum efficiency: η = 0.7
• Squeezing degree: e²ʳ = 30 (15 dB squeezing)
• Intracavity photon number: N = β² (adjustable)

Evaluation Metrics

Normalized Measurement Noise Spectral Density: $S(\Omega) = \frac{S_w(\Omega)}{|G(\Omega)|^2}$

Units: 1/(photon number), representing noise power per unit signal gain.

Shot-Noise Limit (as benchmark): $S_{\text{SNL}}(\Omega) = \frac{|\Omega|}{4N}$

Comparison Schemes

The paper systematically compares three configurations:

1. No-Squeezing Scheme (r=0, k_c=0): $S(\Omega) = \frac{\Omega^2 + \kappa^2}{8\kappa'\eta N}$
2. Input Squeezing Only (r>0, k_c=0): $S(\Omega) = \frac{1}{2N}\left[\frac{(e^{-2r}+\epsilon^2)\Omega^2 + (\kappa'-\kappa'')^2e^{-2r} + \epsilon^2\kappa^2}{4\kappa'} + \kappa''\right]$
3. Dual Squeezing (r>0, optimized k_c): $S(\Omega) = \frac{1}{2N}\left(\frac{e^{-2r}+\epsilon^2}{4\kappa'}\Omega^2 + \frac{\epsilon^2\kappa'}{1+\epsilon^2e^{2r}} + \kappa''\right)$

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Limitations of No-Squeezing Scheme

From Equation (26), even under ideal lossless conditions (κ''=0, η=1), the noise spectral density always satisfies: $S(\Omega) \geq S_{\text{SNL}}(\Omega)$

Physical Interpretation: Quantum fluctuations of coherent light fundamentally limit measurement sensitivity, preventing surpassing the shot-noise limit.

2. Input Squeezing Gain

Equation (28) shows that with input squeezed light:

• Sensitivity is limited only by optical losses and squeezing degree
• Arbitrarily high sensitivity is achievable in principle (within available squeezing range)
• External losses can be further suppressed by placing an anti-squeezing device (parametric amplifier) in the output path: $\epsilon^2_{\text{ext}} \to \epsilon^2_{\text{ext}}e^{-2R}$

3. Dual-Squeezing Advantages

Comparing Equations (35) and (36) (assuming no internal loss κ''=0):

Input Squeezing Only: $S(\Omega) = \frac{1}{8\kappa N}(e^{-2r} + \epsilon^2)(\Omega^2 + \kappa^2)$

Dual Squeezing: $S(\Omega) = \frac{1}{8\kappa N}\left[(e^{-2r} + \epsilon^2)\Omega^2 + \frac{4\kappa^2\epsilon^2e^{-2r}}{e^{-2r} + \epsilon^2}\right]$

Key Findings:

• When e^{-2r} = ε², both schemes perform identically
• The greater the imbalance between e^{-2r} and ε², the more pronounced the advantage of intracavity squeezing
• Dual squeezing provides greater gain in the low-frequency region (Ω≪κ)

4. Frequency Domain Performance (Figure 2)

Figure 2 displays normalized spectral density (in units of κ'/N) versus normalized frequency Ω/κ':

Parameter Settings: κ'=10κ'', η=0.7, e²ʳ=30

Observations:

• No-squeezing scheme is limited by SNL at all frequencies
• Input squeezing scheme significantly reduces noise across the entire band
• Dual squeezing provides optimal performance in the low-frequency region
• Quantum enhancement remains effective over frequency ranges exceeding the microresonator bandwidth κ

Numerical Estimates (relative to SNL):

• At Ω/κ'≈1, dual squeezing provides approximately 10-15 dB improvement over SNL
• In the Ω→0 limit, the advantage of dual squeezing becomes even more pronounced

Experimental Findings

1. Bandwidth Extension Effect

Squeezed light not only enhances sensitivity but maintains quantum enhancement over frequency ranges exceeding the microresonator's intrinsic bandwidth, crucial for broadband sensing applications.

2. Loss Compensation Mechanism

The key role of intracavity squeezing is compensating for coupling losses (κ'), one of the primary loss sources in microresonator sensors, which external anti-squeezing devices cannot directly address.

3. Parameter Dependence

• Optimal intracavity parametric excitation strength k_c dynamically adjusts with input squeezing degree and output efficiency
• Under high squeezing (e²ʳ≫1) and low detection efficiency (η≪1), anti-squeezing mode (k_c<0) is more advantageous

Related Work

1. Microresonator Sensor Fundamentals

• Braginsky et al. (1989) 1: Pioneering systematic study of high-Q whispering gallery mode microresonators
• Vollmer et al. (2008) 12: Experimental demonstration of single virus detection using resonant frequency reactive shift
• Yu et al. (2021) 10: Comprehensive review of whispering gallery mode sensors in biological and physical sensing

2. Quantum-Enhanced Sensing

• Caves (1981) 17: Foundational work proposing squeezed light to surpass shot-noise limits in interferometers
• Casacio et al. (2021) 19: Experimental demonstration of quantum enhancement in nonlinear microscopy
• Frascella et al. (2021) 22: Experimental proof of overcoming detection loss and noise through anti-squeezing

3. Intracavity Squeezing Technology

• Peano et al. (2015) 23: First proposal that intracavity squeezing via de-amplification enhances optomechanical position detection
• Korobko et al. (2023) 24: Experimental demonstration of internal squeezing mitigating quantum decoherence in force sensors
• Salykina et al. (2025) 25: Intracavity squeezing scheme for Kerr QND measurement (directly extended in this work)

4. Unique Contributions of This Work

• Generalizability: Extends from specific QND measurement to general frequency sensing
• Systematicity: Complete comparison of three schemes: no-squeezing, single-squeezing, and dual-squeezing
• Practicality: Provides explicit optimization strategies and realistic parameter estimates

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Quantum Limit Surpassing: Through input squeezed light, one can surpass the shot-noise limit over broad frequency bands, with effective bandwidth exceeding the microresonator's intrinsic bandwidth
2. Dual-Squeezing Advantages: The dual-squeezing scheme combining input squeezing and intracavity parametric excitation further reduces noise, particularly compensating for coupling loss effects
3. Adaptive Optimization: Optimal intracavity parametric excitation strength depends on the relative magnitude of input noise and output loss, requiring dynamic adjustment based on actual system parameters
4. Practical Feasibility: For typical parameters (Q=10⁹, λ=1064 nm, 15 dB squeezing), significant quantum enhancement is achievable within MHz bandwidth

Limitations

1. Linearization Assumption: Analysis based on linearization of small signals and quantum fluctuations; stronger nonlinear effects require more complex treatment
2. Steady-State Assumption: Assumes classical amplitude is time-independent; dynamic tuning or transient processes are not considered
3. Idealized Model:
   • Does not account for thermal noise and technical noise
   • Assumes perfect parametric excitation control
   • Neglects higher-order nonlinear effects
4. Squeezing Degree Limitation: Current experimental technology achieves ~15 dB squeezing, limiting practical performance enhancement
5. Loss Sensitivity: Although intracavity squeezing provides mitigation, high losses still significantly reduce quantum gain

Future Directions

While not explicitly stated in the paper, the following directions can be inferred:

1. Experimental Verification: Implement and verify the dual-squeezing scheme on actual microresonator platforms
2. Nonlinear Optimization: Study higher-order nonlinear effects on sensing performance
3. Multimode Systems: Extend to multimode microresonators exploiting inter-mode interactions
4. Practical Applications: Test performance in specific applications such as biosensing and chemical analysis
5. Loss Suppression: Develop new low-loss microresonator fabrication techniques and more efficient detection schemes

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor

• Complete Derivation: Systematic derivation from fundamental Hamiltonian through Heisenberg-Langevin equations to quantum noise
• Mathematical Clarity: Introduction of two-photon quadratures simplifies analysis with clear physical picture
• Analytical Solutions: Provides analytical spectral density expressions for all three schemes, facilitating understanding and application

2. Methodological Innovation

• Strategy Optimization: Proposes condition for eliminating SPM effects (k_s=2γβ²)
• Adaptive Scheme: Analytical expression for optimal k_c (Equation 29) with clear physical meaning
• Systematic Comparison: Three-scheme comparison provides decision basis for practical applications

3. Practical Value

• Realistic Parameters: Uses achievable parameters (Q=10⁹, 15 dB squeezing) within current technology
• Broad Applicability: Method applicable to various microresonator-based sensing applications
• Design Guidance: Provides explicit theoretical guidance for experimental design

4. Clear Presentation

• Logical Flow: Problem statement → model development → scheme comparison → results discussion with coherent structure
• Effective Figures: Figure 1 schematic is intuitive; Figure 2 numerical results support conclusions
• Adequate References: Cites key literature in the field with accurate positioning

Weaknesses

1. Lack of Experimental Verification

• As purely theoretical work, lacks experimental data support
• Does not discuss practical implementation challenges (parametric excitation stability, phase control precision)
• Recommend supplementing with feasibility analysis or collaboration with experimental groups

2. Limited Parameter Space Exploration

• Shows results for only one parameter set (Figure 2)
• Lacks systematic investigation of squeezing degree, loss rate, photon number effects on performance
• Insufficient discussion of parameter optimization details

3. Simplified Noise Model

• Considers only quantum noise, neglecting:
  • Thermal noise (potentially significant at room temperature)
  • Technical noise (laser intensity noise, phase noise)
  • Environmental vibration and temperature fluctuations
• These factors may limit quantum gain realization in practice

4. Dynamic Characteristics Not Addressed

• Analyzes only frequency-domain steady-state response
• Does not discuss transient behavior, tuning speed, bandwidth-sensitivity tradeoff
• Dynamic characteristics are crucial for rapidly varying signals

5. Unclear Relationship with QND Measurement

• Abstract and introduction mention QND measurement applications but lack detailed exposition in main text
• Specific distinctions and connections with Ref. 25 insufficiently clarified

Impact

1. Contribution to the Field

• Theoretical Completeness: Provides systematic theoretical framework for microresonator quantum sensing
• Method Generalization: Extends intracavity squeezing from optomechanical systems to general frequency sensing
• Performance Benchmark: Establishes standard methods for evaluating quantum-enhanced sensor performance

2. Practical Value

• Short-term: Provides design guidance for developing quantum-enhanced sensors
• Medium-term: May accelerate commercialization of quantum-enhanced microresonator biosensors
• Long-term: Offers new perspectives for quantum precision measurement technology development

3. Reproducibility

• Theoretical Reproducibility: Detailed derivations, explicit formulas, easily verifiable
• Experimental Reproducibility: Moderate difficulty
  • Requires: high-Q microresonators, squeezed light sources, parametric amplifiers, efficient detectors
  • Achievable with current technology but demands precise experimental control

4. Citation Potential

Expected to be cited in:

• Quantum sensing theoretical research
• Microresonator experimental studies
• Squeezed light applications
• Biosensor development

Applicable Scenarios

1. Ideal Application Scenarios

• Biomolecule Detection: Single molecules, viruses, proteins requiring extreme sensitivity while avoiding photodamage
• Chemical Reaction Monitoring: Real-time reaction kinetics tracking requiring broadband response
• Precision Metrology: Refractive index, temperature, pressure measurements
• Quantum Information: QND photon counting, quantum state characterization

2. Limiting Conditions

• Loss Requirements: High-Q microresonators (Q>10⁸) and efficient detection (η>0.7)
• Squeezing Source: Stable squeezed light source (>10 dB)
• Nonlinearity Requirements: Sufficient Kerr nonlinearity supporting parametric excitation
• Frequency Matching: Signal frequency near microresonator bandwidth for optimal performance

3. Inapplicable Scenarios

• Very low-frequency measurements (Ω≪κ): Technical noise may dominate
• Strong nonlinear regime: Linearization assumption breaks down
• High-loss systems: Quantum gain overwhelmed by losses
• Ultrabroadband applications: Limited by microresonator bandwidth

Key References

1. V. Braginsky et al. (1989) - Pioneering work on whispering gallery mode microresonators
2. C. M. Caves (1981), Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 - Squeezed light applications in interferometers
3. V. Peano et al. (2015), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 243603 - Intracavity squeezing enhancing optomechanical detection
4. D. Salykina et al. (2025), Phys. Rev. A 111, 013715 - Intracavity squeezing for Kerr QND measurement (directly extended here)
5. M. Aspelmeyer et al. (2014), Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 - Comprehensive review of cavity optomechanics

Overall Assessment: This is an excellent paper with rigorous theory, methodological innovation, and practical application value. By systematically analyzing how input squeezing and intracavity squeezing enhance microresonator sensor performance, it provides important theoretical guidance for quantum-enhanced sensing technology. Primary limitations are lack of experimental verification and consideration of practical noise sources, but as theoretical work, its contributions are significant. Recommend follow-up experimental verification and extension to more complex realistic systems.