Survival of Hermitian Criticality in the Non-Hermitian Framework

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2511.12246
• Title: Survival of Hermitian Criticality in the Non-Hermitian Framework
• Authors: Fei Wang, Guoying Liang, Zecheng Zhao, Lin-Yue Luo, Da-Jian Zhang, Bao-Ming Xu
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics), cond-mat.stat-mech (Statistical Mechanics)
• Submission Date: November 18, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.12246

Abstract

This paper investigates many-body phase transitions in the one-dimensional anisotropic XY model under complex-valued transverse fields within the biorthogonal theoretical framework. The authors calculate ground-state correlation functions and entanglement entropy, confirming that their scaling behavior is identical to that of the Hermitian XY model. The fundamental reason for the preservation of Hermitian phase transition characteristics in non-Hermitian systems lies in the persistence, emergence, and breaking of symmetries. Specifically, the ferromagnetic (FM) phase originates from Z₂ symmetry breaking, while the Luttinger liquid (LL) phase is supported by the emergence of U(1) symmetry and the degeneracy of the real part of the energy spectrum. The non-trivial topological properties of the LL phase are characterized by the winding number defined around exceptional points (EPs). Given that non-Hermitian systems are inherently open, this research opens new avenues for exploring traditional quantum phase transitions in open quantum systems, which are typically susceptible to decoherence and environmental perturbations.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Research Question

The fundamental question addressed in this paper is: Can quantum phase transitions and critical phenomena from Hermitian systems be preserved in non-Hermitian systems? If so, through what mechanism?

2. Significance of the Problem

• Theoretical Significance: Quantum phase transitions are central topics in quantum many-body physics, traditionally studied based on Hermitian Hamiltonians. However, realistic experimental platforms (cold atom systems, optical cavities, waveguides, optomechanical devices, etc.) are inherently non-Hermitian due to spontaneous decay.
• Experimental Relevance: Traditional quantum phase transitions are highly sensitive to environmental noise and typically cannot be observed at finite temperatures. If these phase transitions can be recovered in non-Hermitian systems, it means that traditional quantum phase transitions can be observed and probed on experimental platforms based on non-Hermitian physics.
• Physical Insight: Understanding the physical mechanisms of phase transitions in open quantum systems is crucial for quantum information processing and quantum simulation.

3. Limitations of Existing Approaches

• Research in non-Hermitian physics has primarily focused on exploring novel phase transitions unique to non-Hermitian systems, with less emphasis on the perspective of traditional quantum phase transitions from Hermitian systems.
• There is a lack of systematic research demonstrating whether the intrinsic critical behavior of Hermitian systems can persist or be meaningfully expressed within the non-Hermitian framework.
• Understanding of the role of symmetry and its breaking in phase transitions within non-Hermitian systems remains insufficient.

4. Research Motivation

By introducing a one-dimensional anisotropic XY model with complex-valued transverse fields, the authors systematically investigate non-Hermitian quantum phase transitions within the biorthogonal theoretical framework, aiming to reveal the mechanism of Hermitian criticality's persistence in non-Hermitian systems and provide new perspectives for studying phase transitions in open quantum systems.

Core Contributions

1. Demonstrated the robustness of Hermitian phase transitions: Within the biorthogonal framework, the authors prove that quantum phase transitions and critical scaling behavior in the one-dimensional XY model under complex-valued transverse fields are identical to those in the Hermitian case.
2. Revealed the symmetry mechanism: Clarified the physical mechanism of phase transition preservation—the FM phase arises from Z₂ symmetry breaking, while the LL phase is supported by the emergence of U(1) symmetry and the degeneracy of the real part of the energy spectrum.
3. Constructed a complete phase diagram: Established a comprehensive non-Hermitian phase diagram containing ferromagnetic (FM), paramagnetic (PM), and Luttinger liquid (LL) phases, bounded by the elliptic equation $(Re\lambda)^2 + (Im\lambda)^2/\gamma^2 = 1$.
4. Introduced topological characterization: Defined the winding number around exceptional points as a topological invariant, effectively characterizing the non-trivial topological structure of the LL phase.
5. Emphasized the necessity of the biorthogonal framework: Demonstrated that only within the biorthogonal theoretical framework (simultaneously considering left and right eigenvectors) can the phase transition behavior of non-Hermitian systems be correctly captured.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Study ground-state quantum phase transitions in a one-dimensional anisotropic XY spin chain model under complex-valued transverse fields by calculating:

• Input: Hamiltonian parameters (transverse field strength λ = λ₀e^(iφ), anisotropy parameter γ)
• Output: Longitudinal spin-spin correlation functions C^x_{l,l+r}, entanglement entropy S_L, phase diagram, topological invariants
• Constraints: Employ the biorthogonal quantum mechanics framework, considering the biorthogonal relationship between left and right eigenstates

Model Architecture

1. Non-Hermitian XY Model Hamiltonian

$\hat{H} = -\frac{J}{2}\sum_{j=1}^{N}\left[\frac{1+\gamma}{2}\hat{\sigma}^x_j\hat{\sigma}^x_{j+1} + \frac{1-\gamma}{2}\hat{\sigma}^y_j\hat{\sigma}^y_{j+1}\right] + \frac{\lambda}{2}\sum_{j=1}^{N}\hat{\sigma}^z_j$

Where:

• λ = λ₀e^(iφ) is the complex-valued transverse field (λ₀ is the modulus, φ is the phase)
• γ is the anisotropy parameter
• Periodic boundary conditions are applied

2. Fermionization and Diagonalization

Through Jordan-Wigner transformation and Fourier transformation, spin operators are mapped to spinless fermions:

$\hat{H} = \sum_{k>0}\begin{pmatrix}\hat{c}^\dagger_k & \hat{c}_{-k}\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\lambda-\cos k & -i\gamma\sin k \\ i\gamma\sin k & -\lambda+\cos k\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\hat{c}_k \\ \hat{c}^\dagger_{-k}\end{pmatrix}$

Ground-state energy: $\varepsilon^-_k = -\sqrt{(\lambda-\cos k)^2 + (\gamma\sin k)^2}$

3. Biorthogonal Eigenstates

Right eigenstate: $|g_k\rangle = [\cos\frac{\theta_k}{2} + i\sin\frac{\theta_k}{2}\hat{c}^\dagger_k\hat{c}^\dagger_{-k}]|0\rangle$

Left eigenstate: $\langle\tilde{g}_k| = \langle 0|[\cos\frac{\theta_k}{2} - i\sin\frac{\theta_k}{2}\hat{c}_{-k}\hat{c}_k]$

Satisfying biorthogonal normalization: $\langle\tilde{g}_k|g_k\rangle = 1$

Where $\tan\theta_k = \gamma\sin k/(\lambda-\cos k)$

4. Physical Quantity Calculations

Correlation Functions: $C^x_{l,l+r} = \text{Tr}[\hat{\rho}_g\hat{\sigma}^x_l\hat{\sigma}^x_{l+r}]$

Where the density matrix $\hat{\rho}_g = \bigotimes_k |g_k\rangle\langle\tilde{g}_k|$

Through Wick's theorem, it can be expressed in determinant form.

Entanglement Entropy: $S_L = -\text{Tr}[\hat{\rho}_L\ln\hat{\rho}_L]$

Where $\hat{\rho}_L = \text{Tr}_{\bar{L}}[\hat{\rho}_g]$ is the reduced density matrix.

Calculated through Majorana fermion representation and correlation matrix diagonalization.

Technical Innovations

1. Systematic Application of the Biorthogonal Framework

• Key Innovation: Emphasizes the necessity of simultaneously using left and right eigenstates to construct the density matrix; using only right eigenstates cannot correctly describe phase transitions.
• Physical Reason: Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians cannot be completely expanded using only right eigenvectors; the biorthogonal completeness relation must be employed.

2. Topological Characterization of Exceptional Points

Define the winding number around exceptional points: $W = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_0^{2\pi}\frac{\partial}{\partial k}\arg r(k)dk$

Where $r(k) = d(k) - d_e(k_c)$, $d(k) = \lambda - \cos k + i\gamma\sin k$

This topological invariant equals -1 in the LL phase, -1/2 at phase boundaries, and 0 in other phases.

3. Physical Significance of Real Part Degeneracy of Energy Spectrum

• Discovery: The LL phase corresponds to regions where the real part of the energy spectrum is degenerate but the imaginary part is non-degenerate.
• Mechanism: Real part degeneracy leads to the emergence of U(1) symmetry at critical modes.
• Analogy: Similar to energy gap closure leading to critical behavior in Hermitian systems.

Experimental Setup

Dataset (Numerical Calculation Parameters)

• System Size: L = 2 to L = 100 (even number of sites)
• Parameter Space:
  • Transverse field modulus: λ₀ ∈ 0, 3
  • Transverse field phase: φ = π/3 (main results)
  • Anisotropy: γ = 1 (main results)
• Boundary Conditions: Antiperiodic boundary conditions (even number of sites)

Evaluation Metrics

1. Longitudinal Spin-Spin Correlation Function $\text{Re}C^x_{l,l+r}$:
   • FM phase: approaches constant (~1)
   • PM phase: approaches 0
   • LL phase: power-law decay $r^{-1/2}$
2. Entanglement Entropy $\text{Re}S_L$:
   • FM phase: finite value independent of L
   • PM phase: approaches 0
   • LL phase: logarithmic scaling $\sim \frac{1}{3}\ln L$
3. Topological Winding Number W:
   • Characterizes topological properties of phases

Comparison Methods

• Hermitian XY Model: Serves as benchmark for comparison, verifying consistency of scaling behavior
• Right Eigenstate Only Method: Demonstrates its inability to correctly describe phase transitions

Implementation Details

• Solve the fermionized Hamiltonian through exact diagonalization
• Calculate correlation functions through integration in the thermodynamic limit (N→∞)
• Use Majorana fermion representation to calculate entanglement entropy

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Phase Diagram Structure (Figure 1)

Established a comprehensive non-Hermitian phase diagram:

• FM Phase (blue ellipse interior): $(Re\lambda)^2 + (Im\lambda)^2/\gamma^2 < 1$
• PM Phase (green region): $|Re\lambda| > 1$
• LL Phase (yellow region): $(Re\lambda)^2 + (Im\lambda)^2/\gamma^2 > 1$ and $Re\lambda < 1$

Phase boundaries are determined by the ellipse defined by exceptional points, with shape depending on γ.

2. Scaling Behavior Verification (Figure 2)

Correlation Functions:

• FM phase (λ₀=0.5): $\text{Re}C^x_{l,l+r} \approx 1$, independent of distance r
• PM phase (λ₀=2,3): $\text{Re}C^x_{l,l+r} \approx 0$
• LL phase (λ₀=1.5): $\text{Re}C^x_{l,l+r} \sim r^{-1/2}$ (power-law decay)

Entanglement Entropy:

• FM phase: $\text{Re}S_L$ independent of L, maintains finite value
• PM phase: $\text{Re}S_L \approx 0$
• LL phase: $\text{Re}S_L \sim \frac{1}{3}\ln L$ (logarithmic scaling)

These scaling behaviors are completely identical to the Hermitian XY model.

3. Phase Transition Behavior (Figures 2(a2-a3, b2-b3))

Phase transition characteristics along different paths (arrows in Figure 1):

• LL-PM and LL-FM Transitions: Correlation functions and entanglement entropy undergo abrupt changes at critical points
• PM-FM Transition: Continuous variation
• At LL-FM critical point, properties match FM phase
• At LL-PM critical point (Reλ=1), properties match PM phase

Ablation Studies

Energy Spectrum Analysis (Figures 3-4)

• Real Part Degeneracy: In the LL phase, the minimum value of the real part of the energy spectrum $|Re\varepsilon_k|_{min}$ can be degenerate
• Imaginary Part Non-degeneracy: The imaginary part remains non-degenerate in the LL phase
• Sign Reversal: The imaginary part energy undergoes sign reversal at the real part degeneracy point across the full spectrum

This finding reveals:

• Real part degeneracy is analogous to energy gap closure in Hermitian systems
• Imaginary part sign determines mode stability and occupation

Symmetry Analysis (Table I)

Systematic comparison of phase transition conditions in Hermitian and non-Hermitian models:

• Z₂ symmetry determines FM phase in both cases
• Hermitian system: explicit U(1) symmetry when γ=0
• Non-Hermitian system: emergent U(1) symmetry at real part degeneracy

Case Studies

Topological Winding Number (Figure 5)

Along the path λ = λ₀e^(iπ/3):

• FM phase (λ₀<√(1-1/3)≈0.82): W = 0
• LL phase (0.82<λ₀<1): W = -1 (non-trivial topology)
• PM phase (λ₀>1): W = 0
• Phase boundaries: W = -1/2

The winding number jumps clearly identify topological phase transitions.

Experimental Findings

1. Robust Preservation of Hermitian Criticality: The scaling behavior of correlation functions and entanglement entropy in non-Hermitian systems is completely identical to Hermitian systems, including critical exponents.
2. Symmetry Emergence Mechanism: At the critical mode ρ_, the system satisfies U(1) rotational invariance (Equation 8). This symmetry is not intrinsic to the Hamiltonian but emerges spontaneously.
3. Real-Imaginary Part Division of Labor:
   • Energy spectrum real part degeneracy → determines critical modes and phase transition points
   • Energy spectrum imaginary part sign → determines mode occupation and system stability
4. Necessity of Biorthogonal Framework: Using only right eigenstates cannot observe phase transitions; the biorthogonal framework must be employed to correctly capture symmetries and their breaking.

Related Work

1. Quantum Phase Transition Theory

• Classical Works: Sachdev's monograph on quantum phase transitions, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis exact solution of XY model
• Entanglement Entropy Scaling: Pioneering work by Vidal et al., proving that entanglement entropy can distinguish different universality classes
• Topological Phase Transitions: Kitaev-Preskill topological entanglement entropy

2. Non-Hermitian Physics

• Review Literature: Ashida, Gong, Ueda (2020) comprehensive review of non-Hermitian physics
• Exceptional Point Topology: Bergholtz et al. review of non-Hermitian topology
• Experimental Platforms: Realization of non-Hermitian physics in cold atoms, optical cavities, and waveguides

3. Biorthogonal Quantum Mechanics

• Theoretical Foundation: Brody (2014) biorthogonal quantum mechanics framework
• Phase Transition Applications:
  • Edvardsson et al. on phase transitions and biorthogonal polarization
  • Sun et al. on biorthogonal quantum criticality
  • Lu et al. on non-Hermitian Ising chains

4. Relationship of This Work to Related Work

• Distinction from Novel Non-Hermitian Phase Transitions: Unlike exploring phase transitions unique to non-Hermitian systems (e.g., skin effect, exceptional point transitions), this work focuses on the preservation of traditional Hermitian phase transitions
• Supplement to Existing Research: Systematically clarifies the symmetry mechanism, particularly the emergence of U(1) symmetry
• Topological Characterization Innovation: Introduces the winding number around exceptional points as a topological invariant for the LL phase

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Persistence of Hermitian Criticality: Within the biorthogonal framework, quantum phase transitions and critical scaling behavior in the non-Hermitian XY model are completely identical to those in the Hermitian model, including FM, PM, and LL phases.
2. Symmetry-Dominated Mechanism:
   • FM phase: Z₂ symmetry breaking (same as Hermitian case)
   • LL phase: U(1) symmetry emergence caused by real part degeneracy of energy spectrum
3. Topological Characteristics: The LL phase possesses non-trivial topology, characterized by the winding number W=-1 around exceptional points.
4. Advantages of Open Systems: Since non-Hermitian systems are inherently open, this provides new avenues for observing traditional quantum phase transitions on realistic experimental platforms, overcoming decoherence issues.

Limitations

1. Model Specificity: The study is limited to one-dimensional integrable XY models; whether similar properties persist in more complex non-integrable models or higher-dimensional systems remains unclear.
2. Complex-Valued Physical Quantities: Correlation functions and entanglement entropy become complex numbers in non-Hermitian systems; this work only analyzes the real part, and the physical meaning of the imaginary part requires further investigation.
3. Experimental Implementation: While theoretically proven that phase transitions are preserved, precisely controlling complex-valued transverse fields and measuring biorthogonal physical quantities in experiments remains challenging.
4. Finite-Size Effects: Numerical calculations are limited by finite system sizes; behavior in the thermodynamic limit is obtained through extrapolation.
5. Temperature Effects: This work focuses on zero-temperature ground-state phase transitions; finite-temperature behavior is not addressed.

Future Directions

1. Extension to Other Models: Investigate non-integrable models (e.g., Heisenberg model) and higher-dimensional systems.
2. Dynamical Phase Transitions: Explore the manifestation of the Kibble-Zurek mechanism in quench dynamics within non-Hermitian systems.
3. Experimental Verification: Realize and observe phase transitions in cold atoms, superconducting qubits, or optical systems.
4. Physical Meaning of Imaginary Part: Deepen understanding of the physical significance of the imaginary part of complex-valued physical quantities and measurement schemes.
5. Many-Body Interactions: Introduce long-range interactions or many-body constraints to study richer phase diagrams.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor:
   • Based on exactly solvable models, results are reliable
   • Systematic application of the biorthogonal framework is theoretically complete
   • Mathematical derivations are detailed (supplementary materials provide complete proofs)
2. Deep Physical Insights:
   • Reveals the profound mechanism of symmetry emergence
   • Establishes a clear picture of real-imaginary part division of labor in energy spectra
   • Clarifies the physical necessity of the biorthogonal framework
3. Universality of Results:
   • Demonstrates complete preservation of Hermitian critical scaling
   • Topological characterization provides new characterization tools
   • Provides a paradigm for studying phase transitions in open systems
4. Clear Presentation:
   • Phase diagrams are intuitive and clear
   • Scaling behaviors are sufficiently demonstrated through multiple figures
   • Comparison with Hermitian case is explicit

Weaknesses

1. Model Limitations:
   • Only one-dimensional integrable models studied; generalizability remains to be verified
   • Physical realization mechanism of complex-valued transverse fields insufficiently discussed
2. Limited Numerical Verification:
   • Maximum system size L=100 may have finite-size effects
   • Phase space sampling may not be sufficiently dense
3. Experimental Feasibility:
   • Lacks concrete experimental implementation schemes
   • Measurement methods for biorthogonal physical quantities not discussed in detail
4. Treatment of Complex Quantities:
   • Only real part analyzed; physical meaning of imaginary part insufficiently explained
   • Information-theoretic significance of complex entanglement entropy needs further clarification

Impact

1. Theoretical Contributions:
   • Provides new perspective for non-Hermitian many-body physics
   • Establishes research paradigm for traditional phase transitions in open systems
   • Symmetry emergence mechanism has universal significance
2. Practical Value:
   • Provides theoretical guidance for quantum simulation experiments
   • Robustness of phase transitions in open quantum systems has implications for quantum information processing
   • Potential applications in quantum sensing and quantum computing
3. Reproducibility:
   • Complete theoretical derivations, easy to reproduce
   • Standard numerical methods (exact diagonalization)
   • Supplementary materials provide detailed calculation details
4. Subsequent Research:
   • Multiple related works have cited the biorthogonal framework for studying phase transitions
   • Opens new directions for research in non-Hermitian topology and critical phenomena

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research:
   • Phase transition theory in non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems
   • Critical phenomena in open quantum systems
   • Non-Hermitian generalization of topological quantum matter
2. Experimental Platforms:
   • Cold atom systems (controllable dissipation)
   • Optical cavity QED (spontaneous emission)
   • Superconducting qubits (decoherence)
   • Photonic waveguide arrays
3. Potential Applications:
   • Quantum simulator design
   • Experimental observation of robust quantum phase transitions
   • Protection mechanisms in topological quantum computing

References

Key Cited Literature

1. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, D. Mattis (1961) - Exact solution of XY model, foundation of this research
2. D. C. Brody (2014) - Biorthogonal quantum mechanics framework, theoretical foundation of the methodology
3. Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, M. Ueda (2020) - Non-Hermitian physics review, provides research background
4. G. Vidal et al. (2003) - Application of entanglement entropy in quantum critical phenomena, source of analytical methods
5. E. J. Bergholtz et al. (2021) - Exceptional point topology in non-Hermitian systems, theoretical background for topological characterization

Overall Assessment: This is an important theoretical work in the field of non-Hermitian quantum many-body physics. Through exactly solvable models and rigorous biorthogonal theoretical framework, the authors convincingly demonstrate that the criticality of Hermitian systems can be robustly preserved in non-Hermitian systems, and profoundly reveal the underlying symmetry mechanisms. This work not only provides new perspectives for understanding phase transitions in open quantum systems but also opens new avenues for experimentally observing traditional quantum phase transitions. Despite limitations in model specificity and experimental implementation, its theoretical insights and methodology have lasting value for the development of non-Hermitian physics and quantum many-body theory.