2025-11-20T09:19:15.416415

From minimal-length quantum theory to modified gravity

D'Agostino, Bosso, Luciano
In this work, we consider generalized uncertainty principles (GUPs) that incorporate a minimal length through generic momentum-dependent deformation functions. We thus develop a systematic approach connecting such a framework to effective gravitational actions extending general relativity. By examining quantum gravity-motivated corrections to black hole entropy induced by the GUP and employing Wald's formalism, we reconstruct modifications to Einstein's gravity within the contexts of $f(R)$ and $f(R, R_{μν} R^{μν})$ theories. In this way, we establish a direct mapping between the GUP parameters and the higher-order curvature coefficients in the gravitational Lagrangian. As an illustrative application, we compute corrections to the general relativistic prediction for light deflection, which in turn allows us to infer a stringent upper bound on the minimal measurable length. Our results show that GUP-induced effects can be consistently embedded into extended gravity theories, offering a promising framework for testing quantum gravity phenomenology through astrophysical and cosmological observations.
academic

From minimal-length quantum theory to modified gravity

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2511.14869
  • Title: From minimal-length quantum theory to modified gravity
  • Authors: Rocco D'Agostino, Pasquale Bosso, Giuseppe Gaetano Luciano
  • Classification: gr-qc (General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology), hep-th (High Energy Physics - Theory)
  • Submission Date: Submitted to arXiv on November 18, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.14869

Abstract

This paper investigates generalized uncertainty principles (GUPs) that introduce minimal length through universal momentum-dependent deformation functions. The authors establish a systematic methodology connecting this framework with effective gravitational actions of extended general relativity. By examining quantum gravity corrections to GUP-induced black hole entropy using the Wald formalism, they reconstruct corrections to Einstein gravity within f(R) and f(R, R_{μν}R^{μν}) theoretical frameworks. This establishes a direct mapping between GUP parameters and higher-order curvature coefficients in the gravitational Lagrangian. As an application, they calculate corrections to light deflection predictions in general relativity, thereby deriving stringent upper bounds on the minimal measurable length. The results demonstrate that GUP-induced effects can be consistently embedded within extended gravity theories, providing a promising framework for testing quantum gravity phenomenology through astrophysical and cosmological observations.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Research Problem

This paper addresses a central question in quantum gravity phenomenology: how to establish a systematic connection between minimal length effects at the quantum mechanical level (described through generalized uncertainty principles GUP) and semi-classical gravitational dynamics (described through modified gravity theories).

2. Problem Significance

  • Quantum Gravity Detection: In the absence of a complete quantum gravity theory, GUP provides a phenomenological approach to parameterizing Planck-scale effects
  • Theoretical Unification: Multiple quantum gravity candidate theories (string theory, loop quantum gravity, noncommutative geometry) predict the existence of minimal length, requiring a unified theoretical framework
  • Observability: Abstract quantum gravity effects must be translated into predictions testable through astrophysical observations

3. Limitations of Existing Approaches

  • Most existing analyses focus only on specific GUP forms and limited categories of gravitational models
  • Lack of general methodology to reconstruct effective gravitational Lagrangians from arbitrary GUP deformation functions
  • Unclear correspondence between GUP parameters and curvature corrections in gravitational theories

4. Research Motivation

  • Establish a "dictionary" between GUP and modified gravity theories, directly mapping quantum mechanical deformations to semi-classical gravitational dynamics
  • Provide testable astrophysical predictions offering experimental constraints on quantum gravity phenomenology
  • Extend results from reference 38 to polynomial GUP models with arbitrary-order deformation functions

Core Contributions

  1. Universal Theoretical Framework: Establishes a systematic reconstruction method from arbitrary GUP deformation functions to modified gravitational actions
  2. Explicit Mapping Relations: Within f(R) and f(R, R_{μν}R^{μν}) theories, establishes explicit correspondence between GUP parameters and higher-order curvature coefficients
  3. Entropy Correction Calculations: Derives universal expressions for GUP-induced black hole entropy corrections, including terms in √A, ln A, and A^{1-k/2}
  4. Astrophysical Applications: Calculates GUP corrections to solar light deflection, obtaining stringent constraints on the second-order GUP parameter: c₂ ≲ 8.5×10⁷
  5. Minimal Length Upper Bound: Derives an upper bound on the minimal measurable length Δx_ ≲ 9.2×10³ℓ_P, improving existing constraints in the literature

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Input: Deformation function of the generalized uncertainty principle Ξ(Δp) = Σ_^∞ ℓ_P^k c_k(Δp)^k

Output:

  1. Modified black hole entropy expression S_
  2. Corresponding gravitational Lagrangian f(R) or f(R,P)
  3. Mapping relations between GUP parameters c_k and curvature coefficients

Constraints:

  • Low-energy limit recovers standard quantum mechanics (Δp ≪ ℓ_P^{-1})
  • Gravitational theory recovers general relativity in the long-range limit

Theoretical Architecture

Step One: GUP and Black Hole Entropy Corrections

Starting from the modified uncertainty relation: ΔxΔp≥12[1+\Ξ(Δp)]\Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{1}{2}[1 + \Ξ(\Delta p)]

where the deformation function expands as: \Ξ(Δp)=∑k=1∞ℓPkck(Δp)k\Ξ(\Delta p) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \ell_P^k c_k (\Delta p)^k

Through series inversion techniques (detailed in Appendix A), obtaining the expansion of Δp in terms of Δx: Δp=∑n=0∞ℓPnc~n(2Δx)n+1\Delta p = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \ell_P^n \frac{\tilde{c}_n}{(2\Delta x)^{n+1}}

where coefficients c~n\tilde{c}_n are calculated using integer partition theory: c~n=∑m⃗∈P(n)n∣m⃗∣−1m⃗!c⃗m⃗\tilde{c}_n = \sum_{\vec{m}\in P(n)} \frac{n^{|\vec{m}|-1}}{\vec{m}!} \vec{c}^{\vec{m}}

Black Hole Horizon Area Quantization: The minimal area increment from particle absorption by a black hole: ΔAmin=λG[1+∑kGk/2c~k(2Δx)−k]\Delta A_{min} = \lambda G\left[1 + \sum_k G^{k/2}\tilde{c}_k(2\Delta x)^{-k}\right]

Substituting Δx = ζ√A and integrating yields the entropy: SGUP=A4G+a1A−a2ln⁡A+∑k≥3akA1−k/2S_{GUP} = \frac{A}{4G} + a_1\sqrt{A} - a_2\ln A + \sum_{k\geq 3} a_k A^{1-k/2}

where coefficients are:

\frac{d_2}{4G}, & k=2 \\ \frac{d_k}{2G(k-2)}, & k\neq 2 \end{cases}$$ #### Step Two: Wald Entropy and Modified Gravity For f(R) theory, the Wald entropy formula is: $$S_{Wald} = \frac{1}{4G}\int_H d^2x\sqrt{h} f_R(R)$$ In spherically symmetric spacetime, the curvature at the horizon is R_H = 4πγ/A, thus: $$S_{Wald} = \frac{A}{4G}f_R(R_H)$$ **Matching Condition**: Setting S_{Wald} = S_{GUP} yields: $$f_R(R) = 1 + 4G\left[a_1\sqrt{R} + a_2 R\ln R + \sum_{k\geq 3} a_k R^{k/2}\right]$$ Integration gives the Lagrangian: $$f(R) = R + 4G\left[\frac{2a_1}{3}R^{3/2} + \frac{a_2R^2}{4}(\ln R^2 - 1) + \sum_{k\geq 3}\frac{2a_k}{k+2}R^{1+k/2}\right] + C$$ #### Step Three: Extension to f(R,P) Theory For the more general f(R, R_{μν}R^{μν}) theory, where P ≡ R_{μν}R^{μν}, the Wald entropy is: $$S_{Wald} = \frac{1}{4G}\int_H d^2x\sqrt{h}[f_R + 2f_P R_{μν}n^μn^ν]$$ In the spherically symmetric case, R_{μν}n^μn^ν = η/A, leading to a partial differential equation: $$f_R + \alpha R f_P = h(R)$$ whose characteristic curves are P = (α/2)R² + C, with general solution: $$f(R,P) = \int h(R)dR + χ(P - \frac{\alpha}{2}R^2)$$ where χ is an arbitrary function that **does not contribute to entropy but affects spacetime dynamics**. ### Technical Innovations 1. **Series Inversion Method**: Uses Lagrange inversion theorem and integer partition theory to convert implicit GUP relations into explicit expansions (Appendix A) 2. **Systematic Reconstruction**: Independent of specific GUP forms, applicable to arbitrary-order polynomial deformations 3. **Bidirectional Mapping**: Can derive gravity theories from GUP and conversely infer GUP parameters from entropy corrections 4. **Weak-Field Applications**: Transforms formal theory into observable predictions (light deflection) ## Experimental Setup ### Theoretical Test Case: Second-Order GUP Model Consider a GUP truncated at second order: $$\Ξ(\Delta p) = c_1\ell_P\Delta p + c_2(\ell_P\Delta p)^2$$ The corresponding modified gravitational Lagrangian (setting c₁=0, retaining only second-order terms): $$f(R) = R - \epsilon R^2$$ where $\epsilon = Gc_2/(16\zeta^2)$, which is precisely the famous **Starobinsky model**. ### Weak-Field Approximation Solution Employing the metric ansatz: $$ds^2 = (1-2\phi)dt^2 - (1+2\psi)(dr^2 + r^2d\Omega^2)$$ The field equations in the weak-field slow-motion limit simplify to a fourth-order differential equation: $$(1 - 12\epsilon\nabla^2)\nabla^2\phi = -4\pi G(1-16\epsilon\nabla^2)\rho$$ For a point source ρ = Mδ, this yields a Yukawa-type solution: $$\phi(r) = \frac{GM}{r}\left(1 + \frac{e^{-r/\sqrt{12\epsilon}}}{3}\right)$$ $$\psi(r) = \frac{GM}{r}\left(1 - \frac{e^{-r/\sqrt{12\epsilon}}}{3}\right)$$ ### Light Deflection Calculation The photon trajectory equation: $$\vartheta(r) = \int_\infty^{r_0} dr' \frac{1}{r'}\left[\left(\frac{r'}{r_0}\right)^2 F(r_0) - F(r')\right]^{-1/2}$$ where F(r) = 1 - 2φ(r), and r₀ is the closest approach distance. Total deflection angle (expanded to second order in GM/r₀): $$\Delta\vartheta \approx \frac{4GM}{r_0}\left(1 + \frac{e^{-r_0/\sqrt{12\epsilon}}}{3}\right) + \left(\frac{4GM}{r_0}\right)^2\left(\frac{15\pi}{64} - \frac{1}{4}\right)\left(1 + \frac{e^{-r_0/\sqrt{12\epsilon}}}{3}\right)^2$$ ### Observational Constraints Using VLBI measurements of the post-Newtonian parameter γ: $$|\gamma - 1| \lesssim 1.6\times 10^{-4}$$ For photons grazing the solar surface (r₀ = R_☉): - GM_☉ ≈ 7.5×10⁹ eV⁻¹ - R_☉ ≈ 3.5×10¹⁵ eV⁻¹ This yields the constraint: $$\epsilon \lesssim 1.5\times 10^{28}~\text{eV}^{-2}$$ Further deriving the GUP parameter constraint (assuming Δx ~ ℓ_P, A = 4πR²_{S,☉}): $$c_2 \lesssim 8.5\times 10^7$$ Corresponding minimal length: $$\Delta x_{min} = \sqrt{c_2}\ell_P \lesssim 9.2\times 10^3 \ell_P$$ ## Experimental Results ### Main Results 1. **Theoretical Mapping Table** (summarized in Table I): | GUP Order k | Entropy Correction Term | Gravity Correction Term | |---------|---------|-----------| | k=1 | √A | R^{3/2} | | k=2 | ln A | R²(ln R² - 1) | | k≥3 | A^{1-k/2} | R^{1+k/2} | 2. **Minimal Length Constraint**: - This work: Δx_{min} ≲ 9.2×10³ℓ_P - This represents one of the most stringent constraints on second-order GUP models in the literature 3. **Theoretical Consistency**: - In the ε→0⁺ limit, the light deflection formula recovers second-order predictions for the Schwarzschild metric - Long-range limit r ≫ √12ε automatically recovers general relativity ### Key Findings 1. **Infrared vs. Ultraviolet Effects**: - k=1 term (√A correction) corresponds to infrared effects, subdominant in high-curvature regions - k=2 term (logarithmic correction) is a universal feature of ultraviolet quantum gravity - k≥3 terms are relevant only in the deep ultraviolet regime 2. **Uncertainty Function χ**: - In f(R,P) theory, the function χ(P - αR²/2) does not affect entropy but influences field equations - Additional physical arguments (stability, cosmological evolution) are needed to determine it 3. **Positivity Conditions**: - Requires ε > 0 to avoid oscillatory behavior - Equivalent to c₂ > 0, precisely the condition for minimal length existence ## Related Work ### GUP Theory Development - **Kempf-Mangano-Mann (1995)**: Proposed Hilbert space representation of minimal-length uncertainty relations - **Maggiore (1993)**: Derived generalized uncertainty principles from quantum gravity - **Hossenfelder (2013)**: Comprehensive review of minimal-length scenarios ### Black Hole Entropy Corrections - **Adler-Chen-Santiago (2001)**: GUP and black hole remnants - **Medved (2005)**: Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy - **Tawfik-El Dahab (2015)**: Charged black hole entropy corrections using GUP ### Modified Gravity Theories - **Starobinsky (1980)**: R² gravity and inflation - **Sotiriou-Faraoni (2010)**: Comprehensive review of f(R) theories - **Carroll et al. (2005)**: f(R, R_{μν}R^{μν}) cosmology ### Novelty of This Work Compared to Hammad (2015) [reference 38], this paper: 1. Extends to arbitrary-order GUP deformations 2. Extends to f(R,P) theories 3. Provides specific astrophysical constraints ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. **Theoretical Unification**: Successfully establishes a bridge between GUP quantum mechanics and modified gravity theories, providing an explicit "translation dictionary" 2. **Observability**: GUP effects can be tested through astrophysical observations of gravitational theories, converting abstract quantum gravity parameters into measurable quantities 3. **Stringent Constraints**: The constraint c₂ ≲ 8.5×10⁷ from solar light deflection represents one of the most stringent limits on second-order GUP models 4. **Theoretical Consistency**: The framework correctly recovers known results in various limits (low-energy, long-range, ε→0) ### Limitations 1. **Assumption Dependence**: - Assumes approximate saturation of uncertainty relations (coherent state approximation) - Spherical symmetry assumption limits applicability 2. **Parameter Degeneracy**: - No one-to-one correspondence between GUP coefficients c_k and entropy coefficients a_k (e.g., a₂ depends on both c₁ and c₂) - Multiple independent observables required to fully determine all c_k 3. **Theoretical Incompleteness**: - Function χ in f(R,P) theory cannot be determined from entropy alone - Requires additional physical input (e.g., stability analysis) 4. **Weak-Field Limitations**: - Light deflection calculations valid only in weak-field approximation - Strong-field effects (e.g., black hole shadows) require numerical methods ### Future Directions 1. **Gravitational Wave Observations**: Study GUP corrections to binary black hole merger waveforms 2. **Black Hole Shadows**: Calculate black hole shadows in modified gravity and compare with Event Horizon Telescope data 3. **Cosmological Applications**: - Early universe inflation dynamics - Late-time acceleration mechanisms - Primordial gravitational wave spectrum 4. **Complete f(R,P) Theory**: Constrain function χ through stability and cosmological evolution 5. **Non-Spherical Generalizations**: Study rotating black holes and dynamical spacetimes ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Methodological Innovation**: - Elegant and universal mathematical techniques using integer partition theory and Lagrange inversion - Systematic approach applicable to arbitrary-order GUP deformations, not just special cases - Bidirectional mapping (GUP→gravity and entropy→GUP) provides complete theoretical framework 2. **Theoretical Depth**: - Connects three levels: quantum mechanics (GUP) → thermodynamics (entropy) → classical gravity (action) - Reveals degrees of freedom in f(R,P) theory insensitive to entropy (function χ) - Clearly distinguishes infrared (k=1) and ultraviolet (k≥2) quantum gravity effects 3. **Practical Value**: - Provides testable astrophysical predictions - Result c₂ ≲ 8.5×10⁷ improves existing literature constraints - Framework directly applicable to other observations (gravitational waves, black hole shadows) 4. **Writing Quality**: - Clear logic progressing from motivation to applications - Detailed mathematical derivations (Appendix A provides complete calculations) - Clear articulation of connections and distinctions with existing literature ### Weaknesses 1. **Theoretical Assumptions**: - Physical justification for coherent state approximation (uncertainty relation saturation) needs further discussion - Choice of proportionality constant ζ (Δx ~ ℓ_P) affects final numerical constraints 2. **Observational Constraints**: - Single observable (light deflection) constrains multiple theory parameters - Error analysis lacks detail; systematic error propagation not considered - No cross-verification with independent constraints (gravitational waves, black hole shadows) 3. **Theoretical Completeness**: - Uncertainty in χ function in f(R,P) theory reduces predictive power - Self-consistency of quantum corrections not discussed (e.g., higher-loop corrections) - Relationship to other quantum gravity approaches (e.g., asymptotic safety) unexplored 4. **Numerical Calculations**: - Approximation e^{-r/√12ε} ≈ e^{-r₀/√12ε} in light deflection integral needs more rigorous justification - No numerical simulations provided to verify accuracy of analytical approximations ### Impact 1. **Field Contributions**: - Provides new theoretical tools for quantum gravity phenomenology - Unifies GUP and modified gravity research directions - May inspire further work on embedding quantum effects in classical gravity 2. **Practical Value**: - Methods applicable across multiple observational platforms (ground-based, space-based, gravitational wave detectors) - Provides theoretical predictions for future high-precision measurements - Aids in designing dedicated quantum gravity tests 3. **Reproducibility**: - Complete mathematical derivations with key calculations in appendices - Explicit numerical results facilitate independent verification - Clear methodology easily extended to other models ### Applicable Scenarios 1. **Theoretical Research**: - Quantum gravity phenomenology model construction - Microscopic foundation studies of modified gravity theories - Black hole thermodynamics and quantum information 2. **Astrophysical Observations**: - Precision gravitational lensing measurements - Gravitational wave data analysis with theoretical template corrections - Black hole shadow shape predictions 3. **Cosmological Applications**: - Early universe inflation mechanisms - Dark energy alternative models - Primordial gravitational wave spectrum calculations 4. **Experimental Design**: - Theoretical motivation for tabletop quantum gravity experiments - Guidance for next-generation gravitational wave detector science goals - Theoretical support for space-based gravity experiments ## Key References 1. **Kempf et al. (1995)** - Phys. Rev. D52, 1108: Hilbert space representation of minimal-length uncertainty principle 2. **Maggiore (1993)** - Phys. Lett. B304, 65: Deriving generalized uncertainty principles from quantum gravity 3. **Wald (1993)** - Phys. Rev. D48, 3427: Black hole entropy as Noether charge 4. **Starobinsky (1980)** - Phys. Lett. B91, 99: R² gravity and singularity-free cosmology 5. **Hammad (2015)** - Phys. Rev. D92, 044004: f(R) modified gravity, Wald entropy and GUP (directly extended in this work) --- **Overall Assessment**: This is an excellent paper characterized by rigorous theory, innovative methodology, and practical results. It successfully bridges quantum gravity phenomenology (GUP) and semi-classical gravity theory (modified gravity), providing testable astrophysical predictions. Despite some theoretical assumptions and observational constraint limitations, the systematic methodology and explicit mapping relations provide important tools for the field. Particularly noteworthy is that the paper extends beyond formal derivations to calculate concrete observational constraints (Δx_{min} ≲ 9200ℓ_P), demonstrating effective integration of theoretical physics with observational astronomy. This work promises to advance experimental tests of quantum gravity effects and inspire further interdisciplinary research.