Relativistic Covariance and Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics: Tomonaga-Schwinger Analysis

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2511.15935
• Title: Relativistic Covariance and Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics: Tomonaga-Schwinger Analysis
• Author: Stephen D.H. Hsu (Michigan State University)
• Classification: hep-th (High Energy Physics - Theory), quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: November 19, 2025 (arXiv v1)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15935

Abstract

This paper employs the Tomonaga-Schwinger (TS) formalism of quantum field theory to determine when state-dependent corrections to the local Hamiltonian density (i.e., corrections to linear Schrödinger evolution) violate relativistic covariance. The author derives new operator integrability conditions required for foliation independence, including Fréchet derivative terms arising from state-dependence. The research demonstrates that nonlinear modifications to quantum mechanics affect operator commutation relations at spacelike separation, leading to the breakdown of integrability conditions.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

This research addresses a fundamental question in quantum mechanics: Is the linear structure fundamental, or merely an approximation? The linearity of quantum mechanics leads to profound consequences such as the persistence of superposition states, but the fundamental status of this property has long been controversial.

Problem Significance

1. Theoretical Fundamentals: Understanding whether quantum mechanics can admit nonlinear (state-dependent) corrections is crucial for the foundations of quantum theory
2. Relativistic Compatibility: While instantaneous potentials (such as the Coulomb potential) are common in non-relativistic quantum mechanics, relativistic causality in quantum field theory (where influences propagate only within the light cone) makes violations of this property more readily identifiable
3. Experimental Testability: Certain nonlinear quantum mechanics models have been proposed to explain wave function collapse or the suppression of macroscopic superposition states

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. Weinberg's Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics (1989) proposed state-dependent corrections, but their compatibility with relativistic covariance remains incompletely understood
2. Gisin and Polchinski's Analysis showed that nonlinear evolution leads to superluminal signaling, but primarily within a non-relativistic framework
3. Lack of Systematic Framework: There is an absence of a systematic relativistic covariance analysis framework to determine which nonlinear modifications can be acceptable

Research Motivation

This paper adopts the Tomonaga-Schwinger formalism, which provides a covariant description of quantum evolution. Through the requirement of foliation independence (physical predictions should not depend on the choice of spacelike slice), the author derives precise integrability conditions, thereby systematically analyzing the relativistic compatibility of nonlinear modifications.

Core Contributions

1. Derivation of Generalized TS Integrability Conditions: The standard microcausality condition is generalized to include state-dependent terms, explicitly incorporating Fréchet derivative terms (Equation 5)
2. Proof that State-Dependent Evolution Breaks Microcausality: Even when operator commutation relations are enforced on the initial spacelike hypersurface, state-dependent evolution cannot maintain commutation relations at spacelike separation
3. Analysis of Three Specific Nonlinear Models:
   • Weinberg-type local nonlinearity: May formally satisfy conditions, but microcausality assumptions cannot be consistently maintained
   • Non-local mean-field nonlinearity: Explicitly violates integrability conditions even assuming microcausality
   • Kaplan-Rajendran retarded nonlinearity: Despite guaranteeing causal propagation, still violates TS conditions
4. Establishment of Connection Between Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics and Operational Locality Breakdown: Through Ho-Hsu analysis, demonstrates how state-dependent evolution leads to instantaneous entanglement generation between spacelike-separated regions

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Core Task: Determine which state-dependent (nonlinear) modifications to quantum field theory are compatible with relativistic covariance.

Formal Statement:

• Input: Quantum state $|\Psi, \Sigma\rangle$ on spacelike Cauchy surface Σ
• Evolution Equation: Modified TS equation $i\hbar \frac{\delta}{\delta\sigma(x)} |\Psi, \Sigma\rangle = (\hat{H}(x) + \hat{N}_x[\Psi]) |\Psi, \Sigma\rangle$
• Constraint: Foliation independence, i.e., physical predictions do not depend on the choice of spacelike slice

Theoretical Framework

1. Tomonaga-Schwinger Formalism

In linear local quantum field theory, the standard TS equation is: $i\hbar \frac{\delta}{\delta\sigma(x)} |\Psi, \Sigma\rangle = \hat{H}(x) |\Psi, \Sigma\rangle \quad (1)$

where $\sigma(x)$ denotes the deformation of the hypersurface at point x along the normal direction.

Foliation Independence requires that for spacelike-separated points x, y: $\left[\frac{\delta}{\delta\sigma(x)}, \frac{\delta}{\delta\sigma(y)}\right] |\Psi, \Sigma\rangle = 0$

This leads to the standard microcausality condition: $[\hat{H}(x), \hat{H}(y)] = 0$

2. State-Dependent Corrections

Introducing a deterministic nonlinear term: $i\hbar \frac{\delta}{\delta\sigma(x)} |\Psi, \Sigma\rangle = (\hat{H}(x) + \hat{N}_x[\Psi]) |\Psi, \Sigma\rangle \quad (2)$

where $\hat{N}_x[\Psi]$ is an operator-valued functional of the global state. Assumptions:

• Differentiable on the projective Hilbert space
• Evolution is deterministic and norm-preserving

3. Fréchet Derivative

For a mapping $\hat{N}_x : X \to B(X)$, its Fréchet derivative at $|\Psi\rangle$ is: $D\hat{N}_x|_\Psi[\delta\Phi] = \lim_{\epsilon\to 0} \frac{\hat{N}_x[\Psi + \epsilon\delta\Phi] - \hat{N}_x[\Psi]}{\epsilon} \quad (3)$

The change induced by a local deformation at y: $\delta_y\hat{N}_x = D\hat{N}_x|_\Psi\left[\frac{\delta|\Psi\rangle}{\delta\sigma(y)}\right] = -\frac{i}{\hbar} D\hat{N}_x|_\Psi[(\hat{H}(y) + \hat{N}_y[\Psi])|\Psi\rangle]$

Core Integrability Condition

Applying mixed functional derivatives and subtracting, we obtain: $0 = \left[\frac{\delta}{\delta\sigma(x)}, \frac{\delta}{\delta\sigma(y)}\right] |\Psi\rangle$

$= \frac{-1}{\hbar^2}\left([\hat{H}(x)+\hat{N}_x, \hat{H}(y)+\hat{N}_y] + i\hbar(\delta_y\hat{N}_x - \delta_x\hat{N}_y)\right)|\Psi\rangle$

Derived State-Dependent Operator Constraint: $\boxed{[\hat{H}(x), \hat{N}_y] + [\hat{N}_x, \hat{H}(y)] + [\hat{N}_x, \hat{N}_y] + i\hbar(\delta_y\hat{N}_x - \delta_x\hat{N}_y) = 0} \quad (5)$

where $x \sim y$ (spacelike separation). This is the core technical innovation of the paper.

Technical Innovations

1. Systematic Treatment of Fréchet Derivatives: First explicit treatment of Fréchet derivative terms arising from state-dependence in the TS formalism
2. Double-Bubble Diagram Verification: Verification of integrability conditions through sequential application of infinitesimal deformation operators: $U_x(\epsilon) = 1 - \frac{i\epsilon}{\hbar}(\hat{H}(x) + \hat{N}_x[\Psi]) + O(\epsilon^2)$$(U_xU_y - U_yU_x)|\Psi\rangle = \frac{\epsilon^2}{\hbar^2}([\hat{H}(x)+\hat{N}_x, \hat{H}(y)+\hat{N}_y] + i\hbar(\delta_y\hat{N}_x - \delta_x\hat{N}_y))|\Psi\rangle$
3. Non-Automorphic Character of Operator Evolution: Demonstrates that state-dependent evolution $U[\Psi; \Sigma, \Sigma_0]$ is not an algebraic automorphism, hence does not preserve commutation relations

Concrete Model Analysis

Model I: Weinberg Operator Expectation Value Nonlinearity

Model Form: $\hat{N}_x[\Psi] = \lambda \langle\Psi|\hat{O}(x)|\Psi\rangle \hat{O}(x) \quad (7)$

where $\hat{O}(x)$ is a local Hermitian operator density and $\lambda \in \mathbb{R}$.

Property Analysis:

1. Norm Preservation: Since $\hat{O}(x)$ is Hermitian and $\lambda$ is real, $\hat{N}_x[\Psi]$ is Hermitian, ensuring norm preservation
2. Fréchet Derivative: $D\hat{N}_x|_\Psi[\delta\Phi] = \lambda(\langle\delta\Phi|\hat{O}(x)|\Psi\rangle + \langle\Psi|\hat{O}(x)|\delta\Phi\rangle)\hat{O}(x)$
3. Directional Variation Along TS Deformation: $\delta_y\hat{N}_x = \frac{i\lambda}{\hbar}\langle[\hat{G}(y), \hat{O}(x)]\rangle_\Psi \hat{O}(x) \quad (10)$ where $\hat{G}(y) := \hat{H}(y) + \hat{N}_y[\Psi]$
4. Integrability Condition Evaluation: Under the microcausality assumption ($[\hat{O}(x), \hat{O}(y)] = 0$ for spacelike $x \sim y$), all contributions $C_1 = C_2 = C_3 = C_4 = 0$, formally satisfying the condition.

Key Problem: The microcausality assumption cannot be consistently maintained under state-dependent evolution.

Model II: Weinberg Non-Local Mean-Field Nonlinearity

Model Form: $\hat{N}_x[\Psi] = \lambda \int d^3y\, f(x,y) \langle\Psi|\hat{O}(y)|\Psi\rangle \hat{O}(x) \quad (18)$

where $f(x,y)$ is a smooth kernel of spacelike width (e.g., Gaussian decay).

Violation Mechanism: $\delta_y\hat{N}_x = \frac{i\lambda}{\hbar}\int d^3y' f(x,y')\langle[\hat{G}(y), \hat{O}(y')]\rangle_\Psi \hat{O}(x) \quad (19)$

Even assuming microcausality, the commutator $[\hat{G}(y), \hat{O}(y')]$ has support when $y'$ is in the (smeared) neighborhood of y, making the integral generally non-zero.

Conclusion: The Fréchet cross term $C_4 \neq 0$, the integrability condition (5) fails, explicitly violating the TS condition.

Model III: Kaplan-Rajendran Retarded Nonlinearity

Model Form: $\hat{N}_x[\Psi] = \int d^4x_1\, G_R(x; x_1) \langle\hat{O}(x_1)\rangle_\Psi \hat{P}(x) \quad (20)$

where $G_R(x; x_1)$ is the retarded Green function (supported on $x_1 \in J^-(x)$, the past light cone of x).

Analysis: $\delta_y\hat{N}_x = \frac{i}{\hbar}\int d^4x_1\, G_R(x; x_1)\langle[\hat{G}(y), \hat{O}(x_1)]\rangle_\Psi \hat{P}(x)$

The integral has support when: $x_1 \in J^-(x) \cap J^-(y) \quad (22)$

For spacelike-separated x and y on the same hypersurface, this intersection is generally non-empty (common causal past).

Conclusion: Although the KR model enforces retarded (causal) dependence, the TS integrability condition still fails.

Breakdown of Microcausality

Microcausality in Linear Theory

Standard condition: $[\hat{O}(x), \hat{O}'(y)] = 0 \quad (x \sim y) \quad (12)$

In linear quantum field theory, this is preserved through state-independent unitary transformations: $\hat{O}(x,t) = U^\dagger(t, t_0) \hat{O}(x, t_0) U(t, t_0)$$U(t, t_0) = \exp\left[-\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_{t_0}^t d^3z\, \hat{H}(z)\right] \quad (13)$

$U(t, t_0)$ acts as an automorphism of the local operator algebra, preserving commutation relations.

Breakdown in State-Dependent Evolution

In nonlinear theory, evolution becomes: $|\Psi, \Sigma\rangle = U[\Psi; \Sigma, \Sigma_0] |\Psi, \Sigma_0\rangle \quad (15)$

Key Issues:

1. $U[\Psi; \Sigma, \Sigma_0]$ is not a unitary operator in the usual sense
2. Does not act as an algebraic automorphism
3. Does not guarantee that commutation relations of spacelike-separated operators are preserved
4. Even if (12) is enforced on the initial hypersurface, it fails at later times

Connection to Ho-Hsu and Gisin-Polchinski Analysis

Ho-Hsu Result: Consider two coherent wave packets in spacelike-separated regions A and B, initially in an unentangled product state: $|\Psi(0)\rangle = |\psi_A\rangle \otimes |\psi_B\rangle \quad (16)$

Under state-dependent nonlinear evolution: $i\hbar \partial_t |\Psi(t)\rangle = (\hat{H} + \hat{N}[\Psi(t)])|\Psi(t)\rangle \quad (17)$

At the next instant $t = 0^+$, the global state becomes entangled, despite A and B remaining spacelike separated.

Physical Meaning:

• Instantaneous correlations generate operational locality breakdown
• Equivalent to failure of foliation independence in TS formalism

Impact on Microcausality: For spacelike-separated A, B: $\hat{O}_A\hat{O}_B|\psi\rangle \neq \hat{O}_B\hat{O}_A|\psi\rangle$

The action of an operator at B instantaneously changes the system at A through state-dependent effects, and vice versa: $\hat{O}_A(\hat{O}_B|\psi\rangle) = \hat{O}_A|\psi'_B\rangle \neq \hat{O}_B|\psi'_A\rangle = \hat{O}_B(\hat{O}_A|\psi\rangle)$

Experimental Setup

This is a purely theoretical study with no experimental datasets or numerical simulations. The analysis is based on:

1. Mathematical Derivation: Rigorous operator algebra and functional analysis
2. Formal Verification: Consistency checks via double-bubble diagram construction
3. Concrete Model Analysis: Detailed calculations for three representative nonlinear models

Main Results

Summary of Theoretical Results

*Conditionally satisfied: formally satisfied but depends on unmaintainable assumptions

Core Findings

1. Necessity of Generalized Integrability Conditions: Equation (5) must hold for all admissible states to ensure foliation independence
2. Fundamental Problems of State-Dependent Evolution:
   • Breaks automorphic properties of operator algebra
   • Leads to instantaneous entanglement at spacelike separation
   • Violates operational locality
3. Causality Insufficient for Covariance: Although the KR model ensures causal propagation (no superluminal signaling), it still violates TS conditions
4. Fundamental Tension Between Nonlinearity and Relativity: Any sufficiently strong nonlinearity (capable of suppressing macroscopic superposition states) necessarily introduces non-local evolution

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Tomonaga-Schwinger Formalism (1951):
   • Schwinger 1: Theory of quantized fields
   • DeWitt 2: Application in quantum gravity
2. Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics:
   • Weinberg (1989) 3: Proposed state-dependent corrections to test quantum mechanics, assuming deterministic, norm-preserving evolution
   • Gisin (1990) 9: Proved Weinberg nonlinearity leads to superluminal communication
   • Polchinski (1991) 10: Analysis of nonlinear quantum mechanics via EPR paradox
3. Recent Research:
   • Kaplan & Rajendran (2022) 4: Causal framework for nonlinear quantum mechanics
   • Berglund et al. (2023) 5: Triple interference and quantum gravity
   • Chodos & Cooper (2025) 6: Generalized nonlinear extensions
   • Rembieliński & Caban (2020) 7: Nonlinear evolution and signal transmission
4. Locality Analysis:
   • Ho & Hsu (2014) 8: Explicit demonstration of instantaneous entanglement in spacelike-separated regions due to nonlinearity

Unique Contributions of This Paper

1. Methodological Innovation: First systematic use of TS formalism to analyze relativistic covariance of nonlinear modifications
2. Completeness: Explicit inclusion of Fréchet derivative terms, often overlooked in previous analyses
3. Generality: Analysis framework applicable to broad classes of state-dependent modifications
4. Clarity: Clear distinction between formal satisfaction of conditions and actual physical consistency

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Necessary Conditions: Derives necessary conditions for relativistic covariance in state-dependent nonlinear quantum field theory (Equation 5), which must hold for all admissible states to ensure foliation independence
2. Unmaintainability of Microcausality: State-dependent evolution fundamentally alters operator behavior at spacelike separation. Nonlinear dynamics generally lead to instantaneous entanglement generation between spacelike-separated regions, violating operational locality
3. Universal Conclusions: Whether local Weinberg-type, non-local mean-field, or retarded KR-type nonlinearity, all face compatibility problems with relativistic covariance
4. Underlying Reason: State-dependent evolution does not preserve operator commutation relations, even when microcausality is enforced on the initial Cauchy slice

Limitations

1. Scope Restrictions: Analysis applies only to deterministic, norm-preserving state-dependent modifications of the form in Equation (2); some other proposals may fall outside this scope
2. Technical Assumptions:
   • Assumes $\hat{N}_x[\Psi]$ is differentiable on the projective Hilbert space
   • Technical details of smearing treatment not fully developed
   • Operator domain issues ("formally, on D") not deeply discussed
3. Lack of Constructive Results: Primarily negative results (proving certain modifications are incompatible); does not provide positive schemes for constructing relativistically covariant nonlinear theories
4. Limited Experimental Guidance: As purely theoretical analysis, provides no direct experimental test schemes

Future Directions

1. Alternative Formulations: Explore other nonlinear modifications outside the form of Equation (2)
2. Quantum Gravity Connections: Nonlinear modifications may relate to quantum gravity effects, warranting further exploration
3. Experimental Tests: Design experimental schemes to test predictions of nonlinear quantum mechanics
4. Wave Function Collapse Models: Analyze specific collapse models (e.g., GRW) within the TS framework

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Methodological Rigor:
   • TS formalism provides a covariant analysis framework
   • Explicit treatment of Fréchet derivatives fills a gap in the literature
   • Rigorous mathematical derivations with double-bubble diagram verification enhancing credibility
2. Generality of Results:
   • Analysis of three representative models covering local, non-local, and retarded types
   • Reveals deep tension between state-dependent evolution and relativistic covariance
   • Conclusions have broad applicability
3. Deep Physical Insights:
   • Clearly elucidates the importance of automorphic properties of operator algebras
   • Connects multiple related research areas (Ho-Hsu, Gisin-Polchinski)
   • Distinguishes between "formal satisfaction" and "physical consistency"
4. Clear Presentation:
   • Logical structure from general framework to concrete models
   • Precise mathematical notation
   • Sufficient physical explanation

Weaknesses

1. Incomplete Technical Details:
   • Smearing treatment not fully developed
   • Operator domain issues only briefly mentioned
   • Some computational steps (e.g., localization in Equation 19) need more detail
2. Absence of Constructive Schemes:
   • Primarily negative results
   • No proposed solutions or corrective directions
   • Does not definitively answer whether relativistically covariant nonlinear theories exist
3. Weak Experimental Connection:
   • Purely theoretical analysis
   • Does not discuss experimentally testable predictions
   • Limited connection to existing experimental constraints
4. Some Discussions Could Be Deepened:
   • KR model analysis relatively brief
   • Possible quantum gravity connections only briefly mentioned
   • Characterization of "admissible states" set not sufficiently explicit

Impact Assessment

1. Academic Value:
   • Provides systematic framework for relativistic covariance research in nonlinear quantum mechanics
   • Clarifies covariance issues for several important models
   • Expected to be widely cited in subsequent research
2. Theoretical Significance:
   • Deepens understanding of the foundational status of quantum mechanics' linearity
   • Reveals fundamental limitations of state-dependent evolution
   • Important implications for quantum foundations research
3. Practical Value:
   • Limited direct practical value (purely theoretical)
   • Provides testing criteria for newly proposed nonlinear models
   • Offers guidance for wave function collapse model research
4. Reproducibility:
   • Mathematical derivations independently verifiable
   • No numerical simulations or experimental data involved
   • Highly reproducible

Applicable Scenarios

1. Quantum Foundations Research: Judging relativistic compatibility of nonlinear quantum mechanics models
2. Quantum Gravity Theory: Evaluating possible nonlinear effects
3. Wave Function Collapse Models: Analyzing covariance of dynamical collapse theories
4. Theoretical Physics Education: Demonstrating TS formalism applications in analyzing relativistic covariance

References

Core Citations

1. J. Schwinger (1951): The theory of quantized fields. I - Foundational work on TS formalism
2. B. S. DeWitt (1967): Quantum theory of gravity. I - Application of TS formalism to gravity
3. S. Weinberg (1989): Testing quantum mechanics - Important proposal for nonlinear QM
4. D. E. Kaplan & S. Rajendran (2022): A Causal Framework for Non-Linear Quantum Mechanics - Retarded nonlinearity model
5. C. M. Ho & S. D. H. Hsu (2014): Locality and Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics - Instantaneous entanglement analysis
6. N. Gisin (1990): Weinberg's non-linear quantum mechanics and superluminal communications
7. J. Polchinski (1991): Weinberg's nonlinear quantum mechanics and the EPR paradox

Overall Assessment

This is a high-quality theoretical physics paper that systematically analyzes the relativistic covariance problem of nonlinear quantum mechanics using a rigorous mathematical framework. Main contributions include:

1. Derivation of generalized TS integrability conditions including Fréchet derivatives
2. Revelation of fundamental tension between state-dependent evolution and microcausality maintenance
3. Analysis of three representative model classes, demonstrating universality of covariance problems

The paper's core insight is that state-dependent evolution breaks the automorphic properties of operator algebras, making it impossible to maintain commutation relations at spacelike separation. This is a deeper problem than mere integrability condition checking.

Although primarily yielding negative results and having limited experimental connection, this work provides important theoretical support for understanding the foundational status of quantum mechanics' linearity and has significant implications for quantum foundations research.