Can Wolf-Rayet stars be the missing ingredient to explain high-z He II ionizing radiation?

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2511.16323
• Title: Can Wolf-Rayet stars be the missing ingredient to explain high-z He II ionizing radiation?
• Authors: G. González-Torà, A. A. C. Sander, E. Egorova, O. Egorov, M. Bernini-Peron, J. Josiek, K. Kreckel, R. R. Lefever, V. Ramachandran, E. C. Schösser
• Institution: Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg
• Classification: astro-ph.GA (Galactic Astrophysics), astro-ph.SR (Stellar Astrophysics)
• Submission Date: November 20, 2025 (arXiv submission)
• Conference: IAU Centenary Symposium - Under One Sky
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.16323

Abstract

This study investigates whether Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars can explain the source of He II ionizing radiation in high-redshift galaxies. Classical WR stars are hot, massive, hydrogen-depleted stars. In low-metallicity environments, WN3-type WR stars with relatively thin stellar winds are primary sources of ionizing radiation. The research employs the Local Volume Mapper (LVM) to compare resolved stellar spectra with integrated region spectra of WN3 stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), focusing on the He II λ4686 Å spectral line. Results show that stellar emission becomes diluted in nebular regions and becomes undetectable when integrated over areas larger than 24 pc. Nevertheless, the ionizing photons emitted by these stars are sufficient to explain the observed He II nebular emission, making them strong candidates as He II ionization sources in low-metallicity and high-redshift galaxies.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Questions

1. The Mystery of He II Ionizing Radiation Origin: He II recombination emission lines have been detected in both high-redshift galaxies and nearby low-metallicity dwarf galaxies, requiring photons with energies exceeding 228 Å (54.4 eV) to ionize He⁺. Current stellar evolution models and stellar population synthesis models cannot reproduce the required He II ionizing photon flux.
2. Contradiction Between Theory and Observation: Current stellar evolution models fail to reproduce the observed WN3 stage at SMC metallicity and lower metallicities, leading to significant defects in stellar population synthesis models.

Research Significance

1. Cosmological Importance: Understanding He II ionization sources is crucial for studying galaxy evolution, particularly in the early universe (high-redshift) environment.
2. Stellar Physics: WN3 stars, as a special evolutionary stage of massive stars, have important implications for understanding stellar evolution pathways through their physical properties and ionizing radiation contributions.
3. Observational Methodology: Identifying and quantifying these hidden ionization sources in unresolved high-redshift galaxies represents an important challenge in observational astrophysics.

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Stellar Evolution Model Defects: Unable to predict WN3 star formation and properties in low-metallicity environments.
2. Stellar Population Synthesis Model Insufficiency: Lacking WN3 star contributions, resulting in insufficient He II ionizing photon budget.
3. Observational Challenges: In integrated spectra, WN3 star characteristics are diluted and difficult to detect directly.

Research Motivation

Using the SMC as a natural laboratory for low-metallicity environments (Z ≈ 0.2 Z⊙), this study quantitatively investigates WN3 star detectability and ionizing photon contributions at different spatial scales by comparing individual star-resolved spectra with IFU integrated spectra, providing local reference points for understanding high-redshift galaxies.

Core Contributions

1. First Systematic Study of WN3 Star Spatial Dilution Effects: Using SDSS-V LVM IFU data, quantitatively analyzing the dilution of WN3 star He II λ4686 Å emission lines at different spatial scales (12-181 pc).
2. Determination of Detection Critical Scale: Finding that WN3 star stellar components completely disappear when integrated diameter exceeds 24 pc, with important implications for understanding high-redshift observations.
3. Confirmation of Sufficient Ionizing Photon Budget: Despite stellar feature dilution, the ionizing photon numbers inferred from nebular He II emission lines are consistent with stellar model predictions (QHeII,LVM/QHeII,star < 1), demonstrating that a single WN3 star can produce the observed nebular emission.
4. Provision of Candidate Solution for High-Redshift He II Problem: Offering a reasonable stellar source explanation for He II ionizing radiation in low-metallicity and high-redshift galaxies.
5. Revelation of Critical Defects in Stellar Population Synthesis Models: Indicating that current models lack WN3 stars as a key component, with major implications for cosmological simulations.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Research Objective: Quantify the detectability of WN3-type Wolf-Rayet stars in integrated spectra and assess their contribution as He II ionization sources.

Inputs:

• Individual star-resolved spectra (from Foellmi et al. 2003)
• IFU integrated spectra (SDSS-V LVM data)
• Atmospheric model parameters (PoWR code)

Outputs:

• Stellar feature dilution degree at different spatial scales
• Comparison of He II ionizing photon production rates (QHeII)
• Relationship between stellar contribution and nebular emission

Observational and Model Architecture

1. Sample Selection

Study of 6 known WN3 stars in the SMC:

• AB 1, AB 7, AB 9, AB 10, AB 11, AB 12
• These stars have published optical spectra (3700-6830 Å)
• Detailed atmospheric model analyses available (Hainich et al. 2015; Shenar et al. 2016)

2. Atmospheric Model Analysis

Using PoWR (Potsdam Wolf-Rayet) atmospheric code for spectral modeling:

Key Parameters:

• Effective temperature Teff > 30,000 K
• Stellar wind optical depth τF(Rsonic)
• Stellar radius R*

Stellar Wind Optical Depth Classification:

• AB 7: τF(Rsonic) = 2.1 (only optically thick wind)
• Other stars: τF(Rsonic) = 0.29-0.8 (optically thin winds)

Ionizing Photon Production Rate Calculation: Q_{\text{edge}} := 4\pi R_*^2 \int_{\nu_{\text{edge}}}^{\infty} \frac{F_\nu}{h\nu} d\nu \tag{1}

Where:

• Fν: stellar flux
• R*: stellar radius
• νedge: ionization edge frequency
• For He II: νedge corresponds to λ < 228 Å

3. IFU Observational Strategy

SDSS-V Local Volume Mapper (LVM) Technical Specifications:

• Field of view: 0.5 degree
• Number of fibers: 1801 (hexagonal arrangement)
• Fiber aperture: 35.3"
• Spectral coverage: 3600-9800 Å
• Spectral resolution: R ~ 4000

Integrated Aperture Settings: Five different angular radii studied:

• 20" → diameter 12 pc
• 40" → diameter 24 pc
• 80" → diameter 48 pc
• 160" → diameter 96 pc
• 300" → diameter 181 pc

4. Nebular He II Ionizing Photon Production Rate Estimation

Using the formula from Kehrig et al. (2015):

Q(\text{He II}) = \frac{L_{\text{He II}}}{j(\lambda 4686)/\alpha_B(\text{He II})} \approx \frac{L_{\text{He II}}}{3.66 \times 10^{-13}} \tag{2}

Where:

• LHeII: He II λ4686 Å line luminosity (obtained from LVM spectra)
• j(λ4686): photon energy at 4686 Å
• αB(HeII): recombination coefficient (assuming case B recombination, Te ~ 2×10⁴ K)

Technical Innovation Points

1. Multi-Scale Comparison Method: First systematic comparison of stellar and nebular components at multiple spatial scales, quantifying dilution effects.
2. Ionizing Photon Budget Closure Test: Independent estimation of QHeII using both stellar models and nebular diagnostics, achieving self-consistency verification.
3. Local-to-High-Redshift Analogy: Using SMC as a resolvable low-metallicity environment to provide calibration for unresolved high-redshift observations.
4. Relationship Between Stellar Wind Optical Depth and Ionizing Radiation: Clarifying the physical picture that stellar wind optical depth and He II ionizing photon transparency are not completely consistent.

Experimental Setup

Datasets

Individual Star Spectral Data

• Source: Foellmi et al. (2003)
• Wavelength Range: 3700-6830 Å
• Targets: 6 SMC WN3 stars
• Atmospheric Models: PoWR models from Hainich et al. (2015) and Shenar et al. (2016)

IFU Data

• Survey Project: SDSS-V Local Volume Mapper
• Observation Targets: SMC region, covering 6 WN3 stars and surrounding nebulae
• Data Characteristics:
  • Spatially-resolved spectral cubes
  • Integrated spectra extractable at different apertures
  • Simultaneously containing stellar and nebular components

Analysis Pipeline

1. Spectral Normalization: Normalizing He II λ4686 Å line fluxes at different apertures for easy comparison of stellar feature dilution.
2. Component Separation:
   • Stellar component: broad emission lines (WN3 star characteristic)
   • Nebular component: narrow emission lines (He II recombination line)
3. Ionizing Photon Production Rate Calculation:
   • QHeII,star: calculated from PoWR models (Equation 1)
   • QHeII,LVM: calculated from nebular He II emission (Equation 2)

Evaluation Metrics

1. Dilution Degree: Assessing stellar feature visibility at different apertures through normalized flux
2. Ionizing Photon Production Rate Ratio: $\text{Ratio} = \frac{Q_{\text{HeII,LVM}}}{Q_{\text{HeII,star}}}$
   • Ratio < 1: stellar-produced ionizing photons sufficient to explain nebular emission
   • Ratio ~ 1: stellar contribution matches nebular requirements
   • Ratio > 1: additional ionization sources needed
3. Detection Critical Scale: Minimum integrated diameter where stellar features become undetectable

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Spatial Dilution of Stellar Features (Figure 1 and text description)

AB 7 Case Analysis (middle panel of Figure 1):

• 20" aperture (12 pc): Stellar He II λ4686 Å broad emission line clearly visible
• 40" aperture (24 pc): Stellar component completely disappears, only nebular narrow line remains
• Larger apertures: Stellar features completely overwhelmed by nebular emission

General Conclusion: The complete study by González-Torà et al. (2025) shows that stellar contributions from all 6 WN3 stars are completely diluted at 24 pc diameter.

Physical Explanation:

• WN3 star broad emission line flux disperses over larger integrated areas
• Nebular narrow line emission originates from larger spatial regions, becoming relatively enhanced during integration
• Surface brightness contrast effects mask stellar features

2. Ionizing Photon Budget Analysis (Figure 2)

Key Findings:

• Most Cases: QHeII,LVM/QHeII,star < 1
  • AB 1, AB 9, AB 10, AB 11, AB 12 satisfy this at all apertures
  • Single WN3 stars produce ionizing photons exceeding nebular requirements
• AB 7 Special Case:
  • Diameter < 48 pc: Ratio < 1 (stellar contribution sufficient)
  • Diameter > 48 pc: Ratio > 1 (additional ionization sources present)
  • Reason: Mixing with other He II ionization sources in NGC 395

Quantitative Results:

• Stellar model prediction: log QHeII,star ≈ 48.5 s⁻¹ (AB 7 example)
• Nebular observation inference: consistent with model prediction within error margins
• Hydrogen ionizing photon production rate: log QHI ≈ 50.0 s⁻¹ (right panel of Figure 1)

3. Impact of Stellar Wind Optical Depth

Important Finding:

• Stellar wind optical depth (τF) not completely correlated with He II ionizing photon escape
• AB 7: τF = 2.1 (optically thick), yet still strong He II ionization source
• Individual stars: τF < 1 (optically thin), similarly producing sufficient He II ionizing photons

Physical Significance:

• Optically thin winds more favorable for hard radiation escape
• Even optically thick winds can effectively produce and escape He II ionizing photons
• Consistent with theoretical studies by Sander et al. (2023)

Summary of Experimental Findings

1. Paradox of Undetectability and Effectiveness:
   • WN3 stars difficult to detect in integrated spectra (d > 24 pc)
   • Yet their ionizing photon contributions remain significant and measurable (via nebular emission)
2. Specificity of Low-Metallicity Environments:
   • WN3 stars more common at SMC metallicity (Z ≈ 0.2 Z⊙)
   • Thinner winds more favorable for hard radiation escape
3. Implications for High-Redshift Galaxies:
   • Even without direct evidence of WN3 stars in unresolved observations
   • They may still be major contributors to He II nebular emission
4. Evidence of Model Defects:
   • Observed WN3 stars missing in current evolution models
   • This causes stellar population synthesis models to systematically underestimate He II ionizing photons

Related Work

Observational Studies of He II Ionizing Radiation

1. High-Redshift Galaxies:
   • Topping et al. (2025): He II emission line detection in high-redshift galaxies
   • Challenge: existing models cannot explain observed He II intensities
2. Nearby Low-Metallicity Galaxies:
   • Kehrig et al. (2018, 2015): He II emission discovery in local dwarf galaxies
   • Wofford et al. (2021): Study of ionization sources in low-metallicity environments

Wolf-Rayet Star Research

1. Spectral Classification and Modeling:
   • Crowther (2007): WR star classification variation with metallicity
   • Hainich et al. (2015): Systematic atmospheric analysis of SMC WN stars
   • Shenar et al. (2016): WN stars in binary systems
2. Ionizing Radiation Contributions:
   • Sander (2022): Theoretical study of WR stars as He II ionization sources
   • Sander et al. (2023): Relationship between stellar wind optical depth and ionizing radiation
   • Sander et al. (2025): Discovery of WN2 stars

Atmospheric Models and Stellar Population Synthesis

1. PoWR Code Development:
   • Gräfener et al. (2002): PoWR code foundation
   • Sander et al. (2015): Code improvements and applications
2. Stellar Population Synthesis Defects:
   • Current models cannot reproduce WN3 stage at low metallicity
   • Results in insufficient He II ionizing photon budget

Unique Contributions of This Work

1. Methodological Innovation: First systematic combination of individual star spectra and IFU data to quantify spatial dilution effects
2. Observational Advantages: Using high-quality SDSS-V LVM IFU data for multi-scale analysis
3. Theoretical Connection: Establishing direct links between local observations and high-redshift problems
4. Model Calibration: Providing observational constraints for improving stellar population synthesis models

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Hidden Nature of WN3 Stars:
   • In integrated spectra, WN3 star stellar features completely disappear at diameters exceeding 24 pc
   • This explains why these stars are difficult to detect directly in unresolved high-redshift galaxies
2. Sufficiency of Ionizing Photons:
   • Despite stellar feature dilution, single WN3 stars produce He II ionizing photons sufficient to explain observed nebular emission
   • QHeII,LVM/QHeII,star < 1 (most cases) confirms this
3. Feasibility as High-Redshift He II Source:
   • Low-metallicity WN3 stars are strong candidates for He II ionizing radiation in high-redshift and low-metallicity galaxies
   • Can resolve the insufficient He II photon budget problem in current stellar population synthesis models
4. Urgent Issue in Evolution Models:
   • Current evolution models cannot reproduce WN3 stage at SMC and lower metallicities
   • Resolving the origin of WN3 stars and related objects (e.g., WN2 stars) is key to improving stellar population synthesis and cosmological simulations

Limitations

1. Limited Sample:
   • Only 6 WN3 stars in SMC studied
   • Larger samples needed to verify generality of conclusions
2. Single Metallicity Environment:
   • Primarily based on SMC (Z ≈ 0.2 Z⊙)
   • Extrapolation to lower metallicity environments (e.g., high-redshift universe) requires caution
3. Spatial Resolution Constraints:
   • LVM fiber aperture 35.3" corresponds to ~12 pc at SMC distance
   • Finer spatial resolution may reveal more details
4. Contributions from Other Ionization Sources:
   • AB 7 shows additional ionization sources at large apertures (within NGC 395)
   • Multiple ionization sources may coexist in complex stellar cluster environments
5. Theoretical Model Dependence:
   • Stellar QHeII depends on PoWR atmospheric models
   • Model assumptions and parameter uncertainties affect results

Future Directions

1. Evolution Model Improvements:
   • Understanding WN3 star formation mechanisms and evolutionary pathways
   • Reproducing observed WN3 stage at low metallicity
2. Broader Observations:
   • Extension to other low-metallicity environments (e.g., LMC, local dwarf galaxies)
   • Search for more WN3 and WN2 stars
3. High-Redshift Applications:
   • Incorporating WN3 star contributions into stellar population synthesis models for high-redshift galaxies
   • Predicting He II emission in high-redshift galaxies for JWST and other instruments
4. Multi-Wavelength Studies:
   • Combining ultraviolet and X-ray observations for comprehensive understanding of ionization radiation field
   • Studying other highly ionized lines (e.g., C IV, N V)
5. Cosmological Impact:
   • Assessing WN3 star contributions to reionization and early galaxy evolution
   • Improving stellar feedback treatment in cosmological simulations

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Scientific Importance

• Addressing Key Problem: Providing substantial progress on the long-standing question of He II ionizing radiation origin
• Cosmological Significance: Important implications for understanding high-redshift galaxy evolution
• Theoretical Guidance: Pointing directions for improving stellar evolution and stellar population synthesis models

2. Methodological Innovation

• Multi-Scale Analysis: Systematic study of dilution effects at 5 spatial scales with rigorous methodology
• Dual Verification: Independent estimation of ionizing photons using both stellar models and nebular diagnostics, enhancing credibility
• Local-to-High-Redshift Bridge: Cleverly using SMC as a resolvable analog

3. Data Quality

• Advanced Instruments: SDSS-V LVM providing high-quality IFU data
• Mature Models: PoWR atmospheric models developed and verified over many years
• Well-Known Targets: Using WN3 stars with detailed prior studies, solid foundation

4. Result Convincingness

• Quantitative Analysis: Providing specific critical scale (24 pc) and ionizing photon ratios
• Consistency Verification: Good agreement between stellar models and nebular observations
• Physical Reasonableness: Conclusions consistent with stellar physics and radiative transfer theory

5. Clear Presentation

• Logical Structure: Clear progression from problem statement through methodology to results
• Effective Figures: Figures 1 and 2 clearly present key results
• Concise Writing: Core information conveyed effectively within conference paper constraints

Weaknesses

1. Sample Limitations

• Limited Numbers: Only 6 WN3 stars, limited statistical significance
• Single Environment: Only SMC metallicity, lacking systematic metallicity-dependence study
• Selection Effects: Known WN3 stars may not represent entire WN3 population

2. Observational Constraints

• Spatial Resolution: Minimum aperture 12 pc still relatively coarse for studying immediate stellar environment
• Spectral Resolution: R~4000 may be insufficient for fine separation of stellar and nebular components
• Wavelength Coverage: Lacking ultraviolet observations, cannot directly measure ionizing photons

3. Model Dependence

• Atmospheric Model Uncertainties: PoWR model parameters (mass loss rate, velocity field) have uncertainties
• Nebular Model Simplification: Case B recombination assumption may not fully apply to complex nebular environments
• Distance and Extinction: Distance and extinction variations within SMC may affect flux measurements

4. Physical Mechanisms

• Unresolved WN3 Formation: Acknowledging evolution model defects but not proposing specific solutions
• Other Ionization Sources: Insufficient discussion of alternative He II ionization sources (X-ray binaries, shocks, etc.)
• Timescale Issues: Not discussing WN3 stage duration and its impact on stellar population synthesis

5. High-Redshift Extrapolation

• Lack of Direct Evidence: Direct confirmation of WN3 stars in high-redshift galaxies still lacking
• Environmental Differences: High-redshift galaxy star formation environments, IMF may differ from SMC
• Metallicity Extrapolation: Extrapolating from Z=0.2 Z⊙ to lower metallicities requires more verification

Impact

1. Contribution to the Field

• Short-term Impact:
  • Providing strong candidate explanation for He II ionization source problem
  • Promoting observational and theoretical research on WN3 stars
  • Drawing attention to stellar population synthesis model defects
• Long-term Impact:
  • Potentially changing understanding of ionization radiation field in high-redshift galaxies
  • Promoting improvements in stellar evolution models at low metallicity
  • Affecting simulations of cosmic reionization and early galaxy evolution

2. Practical Value

• Observational Guidance: Providing theoretical expectations for JWST and other instruments observing high-redshift galaxies
• Model Improvements: Suggesting improvements for stellar population synthesis codes (BPASS, Starburst99)
• Data Interpretation: Helping interpret existing He II observational data

3. Reproducibility

• Data Accessibility: SDSS-V LVM data publicly available for repeated analysis
• Clear Methodology: Analysis procedures and equations well-described
• Available Models: PoWR code and model parameters published
• Potential Issue: Detailed data processing steps not completely described

4. Stimulation of Follow-up Research

• Already stimulated deeper research by author team (González-Torà et al. 2025)
• Likely to inspire other teams to seek similar evidence in different environments
• Providing specific observational constraints for theorists to explain

Applicable Scenarios

1. Direct Application

• Low-Metallicity Galaxy Studies: Z < 0.5 Z⊙ dwarf and irregular galaxies
• Starburst Regions: Areas with abundant young massive star formation
• Integrated Spectrum Interpretation: He II emission in unresolved environments

2. Cautious Application

• High-Redshift Galaxies: Main motivation but direct application requires more verification
• Higher Metallicity: Z > 0.5 Z⊙ has fewer WN3 stars, contributions may be insignificant
• Old Stellar Populations: WN3 stage brief, limited contribution to old populations

3. Inapplicable Scenarios

• Normal Spiral Galaxy Disks: High metallicity, WN3 stars rare
• Elliptical Galaxies: Lacking young massive stars
• Quiescent Galaxies: No active star formation

References

Key References

1. Observational Foundation:
   • Foellmi et al. (2003): Optical spectra of SMC WN stars
   • Drory et al. (2024): LVM survey introduction
2. Atmospheric Models:
   • Gräfener et al. (2002): PoWR code foundation
   • Hainich et al. (2015): Systematic analysis of SMC WN stars
   • Shenar et al. (2016): WN stars in binary systems
3. Theoretical Support:
   • Sander et al. (2023): Stellar wind optical depth and ionizing radiation
   • Sander (2022): WR stars as He II sources review
4. He II Observations:
   • Topping et al. (2025): He II in high-redshift galaxies
   • Kehrig et al. (2015, 2018): He II emission in local galaxies
5. Follow-up Work:
   • González-Torà et al. (2025): Complete version of this study

Summary: This paper addresses an important unresolved problem in astrophysics—the origin of He II ionizing radiation in high-redshift galaxies—by proposing WN3-type Wolf-Rayet stars as candidate explanation. By cleverly using SMC as a local laboratory, combining individual star-resolved spectra with IFU integrated spectra, the study quantitatively demonstrates that although WN3 stars are difficult to detect in integrated spectra, their ionizing photon contributions are sufficient. The research methodology is rigorous, results convincing, and findings point toward understanding the high-redshift universe and improving stellar evolution models. Main limitations include limited sample size and uncertainties in high-redshift extrapolation, but as a conference paper it adequately presents core findings. This work is likely to have significant impact on galaxy evolution and stellar physics research.