Depairing Critical Current Density and the Vortex-Free State in FeSe Nanobridges

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2511.19054
• Title: Depairing critical current density and the vortex-free state in FeSe nanobridges
• Authors: Yue Sun, Yuling Xiang, Zhixiang Shi, Tsuyoshi Tamegai, Haruhisa Kitano
• Classification: cond-mat.supr-con (Superconductivity), cond-mat.str-el (Strongly Correlated Electron Systems)
• Publication Date: November 25, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19054

Abstract

The depairing limit and vortex-free state in superconductors are crucial for understanding superconducting current physics and for applications in eliminating vortex motion noise. This study realizes the depairing limit and vortex-free state in FeSe superconductors through geometric constraints. Using the focused ion beam (FIB) milling "pickup" method, the researchers fabricated a series of nanobridges with different widths at the same location on a single crystal. By simply reducing the bridge width, the critical current density (Jc) increased by more than one order of magnitude, demonstrating achievement of the depairing limit. Furthermore, in bridges with width smaller than the penetration depth (λ), Jc exhibits robustness under magnetic fields up to 1 kOe, providing strong evidence for the vortex-free state created by the enhanced lower critical field resulting from geometric constraints.

Research Background and Motivation

Research Questions

This study addresses how to realize the depairing critical current density and vortex-free state in superconductors. Both states are critical for understanding the physical mechanisms of superconducting currents and for practical applications.

Importance of the Problem

1. Physical Significance: The depairing critical current density directly reflects the critical velocity of Cooper pairs and the superconducting gap size, serving as a key parameter for understanding superconducting mechanisms.
2. Application Value: The vortex-free state can eliminate noise related to vortex motion, which is significant for superconducting device applications in high-field environments.
3. Material Properties: The depairing Jc represents the theoretical upper limit of current that a superconductor can carry.

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Non-uniform Current Distribution: In conventional superconductors, due to the Meissner effect, superconducting currents tend to accumulate at surfaces/edges, causing vortices to enter the sample when the overall Jc is far below the depairing Jc.
2. Stringent Geometric Requirements: Theoretically, the sample's transverse dimensions must be simultaneously smaller than both the coherence length and penetration depth. However, the coherence length in high-temperature superconductors is only a few nanometers, making this difficult to satisfy.
3. Insufficient Research on Iron-Based Superconductors: While thoroughly studied in low-temperature and copper-based high-temperature superconductors, the depairing limit and vortex-free state in iron-based superconductors (IBSs) remain poorly understood.

Research Motivation

FeSe, as a representative iron-based superconductor, offers unique advantages:

• Tc can be increased from 10 K to 44 K through Te substitution, high pressure, or protonation
• Single-layer FeSe films even show superconducting signatures above 65 K
• High-quality Te-doped FeSe ribbons have been achieved with Jc exceeding 10⁶ A/cm² in self-field
• Possesses a small Fermi surface, multi-band structure, and lies in the BCS-BEC crossover region

Core Contributions

1. First Realization of Depairing Limit in FeSe Single Crystals through Geometric Constraints: By reducing bridge width, critical current density more than one order of magnitude higher than the depinning Jc was obtained at the same crystal location.
2. Confirmation of Vortex-Free State for Width Smaller than Penetration Depth: In nanobridges with W < λ, Jc remains robust under magnetic fields up to 1 kOe.
3. Revelation of Geometric Constraint Enhancement of Lower Critical Field: Calculations based on the Abrikosov formula show that μ₀Hc1 is significantly enhanced as W/λ decreases, consistent with experimental observations.
4. New Pathway for Studying Superconducting Current Physics in Iron-Based Superconductors: Provides experimental evidence for understanding the depairing mechanism in multi-band superconductors.
5. Development of Unique "Pickup" Fabrication Method: Uses continuous FIB milling to fabricate bridges of different widths at the same location on a single crystal, effectively eliminating the effects of crystal quality variations.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

The core task of this research is:

• Input: FeSe single crystal samples
• Processing: Fabricate nanobridges of different widths (W >> Λ, W ~ 2Λ, W < Λ) using FIB technology
• Output: Measure critical current density and its temperature and magnetic field dependence for different width bridges
• Objective: Verify the realization of the depairing limit and the existence of the vortex-free state

Experimental Architecture

1. Sample Preparation

Employs FIB fabrication technology using the "pickup" method:

Process Flow:

1. Use FIB to etch thin lamellae along the c-axis with typical dimensions of 10×10 μm² and thickness <1 μm
2. Carefully lift the lamella with a quartz needle and transfer it to a silicon substrate with contact patterns
3. Connect the lamella to Au contact pads through Pt deposition
4. Use FIB to etch narrow bridges in the ab-plane between two voltage terminals
5. Further reduce the nanobridge width through post-processing

Key Parameters:

• Pearl length: Λ = 2λ²/h = 620 nm (λ = 450 nm, h = 650 nm)
• Two fabricated devices: W = 1250 nm (~ 2Λ) and W = 390 nm (< Λ)
• Thickness h = 650 nm maintained constant

Method Advantages:

• Fabricate bridges of different widths at the same location on the same crystal, effectively eliminating crystal quality variations
• Precisely control the geometric dimensions of the bridges

2. Measurement Techniques

Resistance Measurement:

• Standard four-probe technique
• Tc ~ 8 K (W = 1250 nm), transition width <0.5 K
• Tc(zero resistance) ~ 7.5 K (W = 390 nm), slightly broader transition (attributed to Ga⁺ ion implantation damage)

I-V Characteristic Measurement:

• Use Keithley Delta pulsed system to generate pulsed current
• Pulse width: 100 μs, interval: 3 s (duty cycle ~ 3.3×10⁻⁵), minimizing heating effects
• Voltage integration time: 55 μs
• Critical current criterion: 100 μV
• Magnetic field applied after zero-field cooling to target temperature

Technical Innovations

1. Geometric Constraint Achieving Uniform Current Distribution

Theoretical Basis:

• When W is reduced to the Pearl length Λ, current density becomes uniformly distributed across the bridge
• Avoids current accumulation at surfaces/edges, preventing premature vortex entry

Experimental Verification:

• Jc significantly enhanced as W decreases:
  • W >> Λ (bulk): Jc ~ 2×10⁴ A/cm² (4 K)
  • W ~ 2Λ: Jc ~ 5×10⁴ A/cm²
  • W < Λ: Jc > 2×10⁵ A/cm²
• Enhancement exceeds one order of magnitude, unexplainable by depinning mechanisms alone

2. Geometric Enhancement of Lower Critical Field

Abrikosov Formula: $\mu_0 H_{c1} = \frac{\Phi_0}{4\pi\lambda^2}\left(\log\kappa + 0.081 - 2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n+1}K_0\left(\frac{Wn}{\lambda}\right)\right)\left(1-\text{sech}\left(\frac{W}{2\lambda}\right)\right)^{-1}$

Calculation Results:

• W >> λ: μ₀Hc1 ~ 30 Oe (consistent with literature)
• W/λ ~ 2: μ₀Hc1 > 100 Oe
• W/λ = 0.5: μ₀Hc1 > 1 kOe
• W/λ = 0.1: μ₀Hc1 > 10 kOe

3. Comparison with Theory

GL Theory: Jc(t) = Jc(0)(1-t)^(3/2), where t = T/Tc

Experimental Findings:

• Measured depairing Jc is far below GL and KL theory predictions
• Possible reasons: Special properties of FeSe
  • Tiny multi-band Fermi surface
  • Location in BCS-BEC crossover region
  • Stronger electron correlations than simple BCS superconductors

Experimental Setup

Sample Preparation

FeSe Single Crystal Growth:

• Method: Vapor transport
• Quality: High-quality single crystal, Tc ~ 8 K

Nanobridge Fabrication:

• Technology: FIB (Focused Ion Beam)
• Method: "Pickup" method (commonly used for TEM sample preparation)
• Key Parameters:
  • Lamella size: 10×10 μm²
  • Thickness: h = 650 nm
  • Bridge widths: W = 1250 nm and 390 nm
  • Pearl length: Λ = 620 nm

Measurement Parameters

Temperature Range: 3-8 K

Magnetic Field Range: 0-5 T

Magnetic Field Directions:

• H ∥ ab (field parallel to ab-plane)
• H ∥ c (field parallel to c-axis)

Current Direction: I ∥ ab

Evaluation Metrics

1. Critical Current Density Jc: Determined using 100 μV criterion
2. Temperature Dependence: Jc(T) relationship
3. Magnetic Field Dependence: Jc(H) relationship
4. Comparison with Theory: Normalized Jc versus GL/KL theory predictions

Comparison Methods

1. Bulk Sample (W >> Λ): Jc (depinning) estimated from magnetic hysteresis loops (MHLs) based on Bean model
2. Nanobridges (W ~ 2Λ, W < Λ): Jc directly measured from I-V curves
3. Theoretical Models: GL and KL theory predictions of depairing Jc

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Width Dependence of Critical Current Density

Jc Values at Zero Field and 4 K:

• W >> Λ (bulk): ~ 2×10⁴ A/cm²
• W ~ 2Λ: ~ 5×10⁴ A/cm² (2.5-fold increase)
• W < Λ: > 2×10⁵ A/cm² (more than 10-fold increase)

Key Findings:

• Jc significantly enhanced as bridge width decreases
• Jc in W < Λ bridges exceeds depinning Jc by more than one order of magnitude
• This enhancement can only be attributed to the transition from depinning to depairing

2. Temperature Dependence

Experimental Observations:

• All bridges show Jc decreasing with increasing temperature
• Bridges with W < Λ maintain the highest Jc across the entire temperature range

Comparison with Theory:

• Linear fitting of J_c^(2/3) versus t = T/Tc to extrapolate Jc(0)
• After normalization, Jc(t)/Jc(0) compared with GL and KL theories
• Experimental values significantly below both theoretical predictions

Possible Reasons for Theoretical Deviation:

• Multi-band nature of FeSe
• Strong electron correlations in the BCS-BEC crossover region
• Simple BCS superconductor model assumed in theory is inapplicable

3. Magnetic Field Dependence (W < Λ)

H ∥ ab Direction:

• Jc remains nearly constant for H < 1 kOe
• Slight decrease in 1-10 kOe range
• Significant decrease for H > 10 kOe

H ∥ c Direction:

• Similar behavior pattern
• Jc remains robust below 1 kOe
• Gradual decrease at high fields

Comparison with Bulk Sample (W >> Λ):

• At 4 K, bulk sample Jc decreases rapidly at low fields
• H ∥ ab: drops from ~2×10⁴ to ~5×10³ A/cm² (H ~ 1 kOe)
• H ∥ c: decreases faster
• This rapid decrease is attributed to vortex entry and depinning processes

4. Evidence for Vortex-Free State

Key Observations:

• In W < Λ bridges, Jc remains robust under magnetic fields up to 1 kOe
• This contrasts sharply with the depinning scenario (Jc highly sensitive to magnetic field)

Physical Interpretation:

• Bulk FeSe has μ₀Hc1 ~ 30 Oe
• Geometric constraints enhance μ₀Hc1 to ~1 kOe
• Below H < Hc1, the sample is in the vortex-free state
• Vortex-free means Jc is unaffected by vortex motion, remaining at the depairing level

Theoretical Calculations and Experimental Comparison

Abrikosov Formula Calculations:

• W/λ >> 1: μ₀Hc1 ~ 30 Oe (consistent with experimental reports)
• W/λ ~ 2: μ₀Hc1 > 100 Oe
• W/λ = 0.5: μ₀Hc1 > 1 kOe (consistent with experimental observation of vortex-free state limit)

Reasons for Theoretical Underestimation:

1. Assumption Limitations: Calculations assume vortex trapping is absolutely stable with zero free energy-related terms, causing saturation of μ₀Hc1 enhancement in small W limit
2. Demagnetization Effects: Demagnetization effects from sample geometry not considered
3. Surface Pinning: Disordered surface (thickness ~5 nm) created by FIB milling provides additional pinning, hindering magnetic flux entry

Summary of Experimental Findings

1. Realization of Depairing Limit: Successfully achieved through geometric constraints in FeSe, with Jc enhancement exceeding one order of magnitude
2. Extension of Vortex-Free State: By reducing bridge width, vortex-free state can be maintained up to 1 kOe
3. Theory-Experiment Discrepancy: Experimental Jc lower than theoretical predictions, possibly related to FeSe's multi-band and strong correlation characteristics
4. Effectiveness of Geometric Constraints: Demonstrates that geometric constraints are an effective approach to achieving depairing and vortex-free states in iron-based superconductors

Related Work

Depairing Limit Research

Copper-Based High-Temperature Superconductors:

• YBCO nanowires: Depairing limit achieved; vortex penetration onset field enhanced to ~1 T in 80 nm wide, 150 nm thick nanowires
• YBCO nanobridges: Uniform current distribution achieved by reducing width to Pearl length

Iron-Based Superconductors:

• Ba₀.₅K₀.₅Fe₂As₂: Depairing limit realized
• Fe₁₊ᵧTe₁₋ₓSeₓ c-axis bridges: Depairing behavior reported
• P-doped BaFe₂As₂: Depairing features observed
• This Work: First systematic study of depairing limit and vortex-free state in FeSe

Theoretical Framework

GL Theory:

• Predicts Jc(t) = Jc(0)(1-t)^(3/2)
• Applicable near Tc

KL Theory:

• Based on numerical calculations from Eilenberger equation for depairing Jc
• Assumes superconducting current velocity proportional to order parameter phase gradient

Abrikosov Formula:

• Calculates width-dependent Hc1 in thin-layer superconductors
• Accounts for geometric constraint effects

Unique Contributions of This Work

1. Material Selection: FeSe as representative iron-based superconductor with multi-band, BCS-BEC crossover characteristics
2. Fabrication Method: Bridges of different widths fabricated at same location on same crystal, eliminating material quality variations
3. Systematic Study: Simultaneous investigation of depairing limit and vortex-free state, providing complete physical picture
4. Theory Comparison: Discovery of systematic deviation between experiment and theory, highlighting importance of multi-band strong correlations

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Realization of Depairing Limit:
   • Successfully achieved depairing limit in FeSe nanobridges through geometric constraints
   • Jc increased from bulk value of 2×10⁴ A/cm² to >2×10⁵ A/cm² in nanobridges
   • Enhancement exceeds one order of magnitude, confirming transition from depinning to depairing
2. Evidence for Vortex-Free State:
   • In W < λ bridges, Jc remains robust under magnetic fields up to 1 kOe
   • Geometric constraints enhance μ₀Hc1 from ~30 Oe to ~1 kOe
   • Provides strong evidence for vortex-free state existence
3. Theory-Experiment Comparison:
   • Experimental depairing Jc significantly lower than GL and KL theory predictions
   • Attributed to FeSe's multi-band nature and strong electron correlations in BCS-BEC crossover region
   • Simple BCS model assumed in existing theory inapplicable to FeSe
4. Application Prospects:
   • Provides new pathway for studying superconducting current-related physics
   • Potential in applications eliminating vortex motion noise
   • Particularly suitable for superconducting devices in high magnetic field environments

Limitations

1. Tc Suppression:
   • Ga⁺ ion implantation during FIB fabrication reduces Tc from 8 K to 7.5 K
   • Broadened superconducting transition may affect precision of low-temperature measurements
   • Impact of surface damage layer (~5 nm) difficult to quantify
2. Theoretical Calculation Limitations:
   • Abrikosov formula underestimates experimentally observed μ₀Hc1
   • Insufficient consideration of demagnetization effects and surface pinning
   • Lack of depairing theory applicable to multi-band strong-correlation superconductors
3. Measurement Techniques:
   • Use of 100 μV criterion for defining Ic may introduce ~5% error near Tc
   • Pulsed current measurement, while reducing heating effects, may not completely eliminate them
   • Lack of direct vortex imaging observations
4. Sample Size Limitations:
   • Only two specific widths studied (W ~ 2Λ and W < Λ)
   • Lack of systematic width dependence study
   • Thickness variation effects unexplored
5. Temperature and Magnetic Field Range:
   • Measurements limited to 3-8 K temperature range
   • Maximum field 5 T, higher field behavior unexplored

Future Directions

1. Direct Vortex Imaging:
   • Use scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) or magnetic force microscopy (MFM) to directly observe vortex exclusion caused by geometric constraints
   • Visualize formation and destruction processes of vortex-free state
2. Systematic Size Dependence Study:
   • Fabricate more nanobridges with different widths and thicknesses
   • Systematically study effects of aspect ratio on μ₀Hc1 and Jc
   • Explore optimization of geometric parameters
3. Improved Fabrication Techniques:
   • Optimize FIB process parameters to reduce ion implantation damage
   • Explore low-energy FIB or other nanofabrication techniques
   • Investigate post-processing methods like annealing to recover Tc
4. Theoretical Development:
   • Develop depairing theory applicable to multi-band strong-correlation superconductors
   • More precise models considering demagnetization effects and surface pinning
   • Combine first-principles calculations to understand FeSe's special properties
5. Other Iron-Based Superconductors:
   • Extend method to other iron-based superconductors (e.g., FeSe₁₋ₓTeₓ, 1111 system)
   • Compare depairing behavior across different materials
   • Explore effects of material parameters (Tc, λ, ξ) on depairing and vortex-free state
6. Practical Application Exploration:
   • Investigate potential applications in superconducting quantum devices
   • Explore low-noise superconducting electronics in high-field environments
   • Develop novel superconducting devices based on vortex-free state

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Methodological Innovation:
   • "Pickup" method fabricating bridges of different widths at same location on same crystal is ideal for studying geometric effects
   • Effectively eliminates material quality variations, making results more reliable
   • Fabrication technique generalizable to other layered superconducting materials
2. Experimental Sufficiency:
   • Systematic measurement of temperature and magnetic field dependence
   • Simultaneous study of two magnetic field directions (H ∥ ab and H ∥ c)
   • Pulsed current technique effectively reduces heating effects
   • Comparison of bulk and nanobridge behavior
3. Result Convincingness:
   • Jc enhancement exceeding one order of magnitude provides conclusive evidence
   • Magnetic field robustness consistent with theoretical expectation of μ₀Hc1 enhancement
   • Multiple independent evidence supports depairing and vortex-free state conclusions
   • High data quality with <5% error
4. Physical Insights:
   • Reveals theoretical deviation caused by FeSe's multi-band strong-correlation characteristics
   • Clarifies profound effects of geometric constraints on superconducting properties
   • Provides important experimental evidence for understanding depairing mechanism in iron-based superconductors
5. Writing Clarity:
   • Clear structure and rigorous logic
   • Well-crafted figures and tables with rich information
   • Thorough discussion of experimental details and possible error sources

Shortcomings

1. Depth of Theoretical Explanation:
   • Explanation for experimental Jc being lower than theoretical prediction is largely qualitative
   • Lacks quantitative multi-band model calculations
   • Insufficient discussion of specific effects of BCS-BEC crossover on depairing
2. Absence of Direct Evidence:
   • No direct vortex imaging observations
   • Evidence for vortex-free state mainly indirect (magnetic field robustness of Jc)
   • Lack of direct measurement of current distribution uniformity
3. Limited Sample Number:
   • Only two specific bridge widths studied
   • Lacks fine-grained width dependence data
   • Systematic thickness variation effects unexplored
4. Impact of Ga⁺ Damage:
   • While Tc suppression mentioned, quantitative assessment of impact on Jc lacking
   • Surface damage layer may affect accurate estimation of μ₀Hc1
   • Lack of detailed damage layer characterization (e.g., TEM analysis)
5. High-Field Behavior Exploration:
   • Insufficient discussion of Jc decrease mechanism for H > 1 kOe
   • Lack of analysis of vortex entry mode
   • Higher magnetic field behavior unexplored

Impact

1. Contribution to Field:
   • First systematic demonstration of depairing limit and vortex-free state in FeSe
   • Provides important example for superconducting current research in iron-based superconductors
   • Method generalizable to other layered superconducting materials
   • Advances research on geometric constraint effects in superconducting physics
2. Practical Value:
   • Provides new ideas for developing low-noise superconducting devices
   • Potential applications in high magnetic field environments
   • Inspirational for superconducting electronics and quantum devices
   • Offers new pathway for optimizing superconducting device performance
3. Reproducibility:
   • Detailed experimental method description ensures strong reproducibility
   • Mature FIB fabrication technology easily generalizable
   • Standard measurement techniques reproducible by other laboratories
   • Theoretical calculations based on established formulas, easily verifiable
4. Inspiration for Follow-up Research:
   • Stimulates similar research on other iron-based superconductors
   • Promotes development of depairing theory for multi-band strong-correlation superconductors
   • Encourages application of direct vortex imaging techniques
   • Guides geometric design of superconducting devices

Applicable Scenarios

1. Basic Research:
   • Study intrinsic depairing mechanisms in superconductors
   • Explore superconducting current physics in multi-band superconductors
   • Understand effects of geometric constraints on superconducting properties
   • Study superconducting phenomena in BCS-BEC crossover region
2. Material Screening:
   • Evaluate depairing Jc of different superconducting materials
   • Compare geometric constraint effects across different iron-based superconductors
   • Optimize material parameters (λ, ξ) to achieve high Jc
3. Device Applications:
   • Design low-noise superconducting qubits
   • Develop superconducting detectors for high-field environments
   • Fabricate high-performance superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs)
   • Applications in high-frequency superconducting electronics
4. Technology Generalization:
   • Extend to other layered superconducting materials (e.g., copper-based, nickel-based superconductors)
   • Apply to research on two-dimensional superconductors
   • Combine with other nanofabrication techniques (e.g., electron beam lithography)
   • Integrate with other characterization techniques (STM, MFM)

References

This paper cites important literature from multiple key areas:

Superconductivity Theory Fundamentals:

• M. Tinkham, "Introduction to superconductivity" (1996) - Classical textbook on superconducting physics

Depairing Research:

• S. Nawaz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 167004 (2013) - Depairing limit in YBCO
• J. Li et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 062603 (2013) - Depairing in Ba₀.₅K₀.₅Fe₂As₂

Vortex-Free State:

• V. Rouco et al., Nano Letters 19, 4174 (2019) - Vortex exclusion in YBCO nanowires
• K. H. Kuit et al., Phys. Rev. B 77, 134504 (2008) - Vortex trapping and exclusion theory

FeSe Materials:

• F. C. Hsu et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 105, 14262 (2008) - Discovery of FeSe
• S. Kasahara et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 111, 16309 (2014) - BCS-BEC crossover in FeSe

These references provide solid theoretical foundation and experimental reference for this research.