This paper investigates sets of elements in the group ring (where ) for wildly ramified extensions of complete discrete valuation fields, which are suitable for constructing bases of various associated Galois modules and orders. In the case (where is the characteristic of the residue field), the authors can compute the action of elements () on the valuation filtration, where are generators of . When the ramification jumps of are distinct modulo , these elements indeed provide the desired "sufficiently good" bases.
This paper investigates the problem of constructing explicit bases for associated Galois modules. For a Galois extension , the associated Galois modules are defined as:
The main problem is to find concrete descriptions of all , particularly to construct "good" bases suitable for all .
Associated Galois modules are closely related to associated Galois orders. Since Leopoldt's pioneering work in 1959, the study of associated orders has been an important topic in algebraic number theory. Associated orders are defined as:
The significance of studying associated Galois modules is manifested in:
This paper aims to:
Given a fully ramified Galois extension of complete discrete valuation fields with degree and Galois group , the objectives are:
This is the key tool of the entire theory (Theorem 2.2.2):
Key properties:
Definition (Definition 3.1.1):
Key Property (Proposition 3.1.2):
This means a graded base completely determines the structure of all .
General Result (Theorem 3.2.2): For , where :
When :
This gives .
Graded Independence Criterion (Theorem 3.2.2(3)): Under appropriate conditions (ramification jumps have increasing -adic valuations), the set is graded-independent.
Let , where are degree extensions with ramification jumps .
Key Parameters (Proposition 3.3.1):
Piecewise Linear Function :
h_1 i + \tilde{h}_2 j - d & \text{if } i+j < p-1 \\ (pi-(p-1)^2)h_1 + ph_2 j & \text{if } i+j \geq p-1 \end{cases}$$ **Main Computation** (Theorem 3.3.2): - For $f_{ij} = (σ_1-1)^i(σ_2-1)^j$, we have $d(f_{ij}) = H(i,j)$ - When $i+j \geq p-1$, using the tensor product structure of $K\otimes_k K$: $$f_{ij} = ((σ_1-1)^i \circ \text{tr}_1) * ((σ_2-1)^j \circ \text{tr}_2)$$ - Results are obtained by combining computations from subextensions and Proposition 2.2.4 ### Technical Innovations 1. **Graded Independence Framework**: This is the first systematic introduction of this concept, providing a unified method for constructing bases of associated Galois modules 2. **Deepening of Tensor Product Methods**: While the isomorphism $\phi$ was introduced in [Bon02], this paper: - Develops more systematic theory (§2.2) - First applies it to $p^2$-degree extensions - Establishes relationships with subextensions (Proposition 2.2.4) 3. **Piecewise Computation Strategy**: Distinguishes between cases $i+j < p-1$ and $i+j \geq p-1$, using different methods: - Former uses difference polynomial theory - Latter uses tensor product decomposition 4. **Development of Relative Theory**: Generalizes results to $A_i^0 = A_i \cap k_0[G]$, handling the difficult case where ramification jumps are equal modulo $p$ 5. **Diagonal Bases Concept**: Introduces diagonality as a stronger condition than graded independence, proving that tame lifts automatically produce diagonal bases ## Experimental Setup ### Note This is a pure theoretical mathematics paper (algebraic number theory) and does not contain an experimental section. All results are rigorous mathematical theorems and proofs. ### Theoretical Verification Methods The paper verifies the correctness of the theory through: 1. **Rigorous Mathematical Proofs**: All main results have complete proofs 2. **Consistency with Known Results**: Results agree with those in [Bon02] and other literature in special cases 3. **Internal Consistency Checks**: Results obtained by different methods verify each other ### Example Constructions Although there are no numerical experiments, the paper provides: - Complete computations for the specific case $G=(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})^2$ - Explicit algorithmic framework (Remark 4.2.2) - Connections with known examples such as semistable extensions (Remark 3.3.3(2)) ## Experimental Results ### Main Theoretical Results #### 1. Existence and Construction of Graded Bases **Theorem 3.3.2(2)**: When $p \nmid h_2-h_1$, the set $$B = \{(σ_1-1)^i(σ_2-1)^j: 0\leq i,j\leq p-1\}$$ is a graded base for $K/k$. #### 2. Explicit Description of Associated Galois Modules **Theorem 1.2.1**: Under the above conditions, $$A_l = \langle \pi_k^{[(l-d-H(i,j)-1)/n]+1}(σ_1-1)^i(σ_2-1)^j \mid 0\leq i,j\leq p-1\rangle_o$$ This provides a complete description of $o$-bases for all $A_l$. #### 3. Generalization to Relative Setting **Theorem 4.1.3(II)**: When $0 < v_p(h_2-h_1) < w-1$ (where $w = v_p(e_0)$, $e_0=[K:k_0]$), $B$ is also a $k_0$-graded base for $(K/k, k_0)$. This handles cases where ramification jumps are equal modulo $p$ but distinct modulo $p^2$. ### Key Computational Results #### Values of Function $d$ (Theorem 3.3.2(1)) $$d(f_{ij}) = \begin{cases} h_1 i + \tilde{h}_2 j - d & \text{if } i+j < p-1 \\ (pi-(p-1)^2)h_1 + ph_2 j & \text{if } i+j \geq p-1 \end{cases}$$ **Important Observation**: $p \mid d(f_{ij})$ if and only if $i+j \geq p-1$. #### Values of Function $\rho$ $$\rho(f_{ij}) \sim \begin{cases} (X^{h_1}-1)^{n-i-j-1} & \text{if } i+j < p-1 \\ (\sum_{s=0}^{p-1}(\prod_{l=1}^i(s-lh_1))X^{ps})(\sum_{t=0}^{p-1}(\prod_{l=1}^j(t-lh_2))X^{pt}) & \text{if } i+j \geq p-1 \end{cases}$$ ### Theoretical Insights #### 1. Refinement of Graded Structure - When $i+j < p-1$, $d(f_{ij})$ is not divisible by $p$; these elements are "uniformly distributed" in the graded structure - When $i+j \geq p-1$, $d(f_{ij})$ is divisible by $p$, corresponding to higher filtration levels #### 2. Power of Tensor Product Decomposition For $i+j \geq p-1$, through decomposition: $$f_{ij} = ((σ_1-1)^i \circ \text{tr}_1) * ((σ_2-1)^j \circ \text{tr}_2)$$ one can reduce computations for $p^2$-degree extensions to computations for two $p$-degree extensions. #### 3. Precision of Ramification Conditions The condition "$h_1 \not\equiv h_2 \pmod{p}$" is equivalent to "$h_1 \not\equiv \tilde{h}_2 \pmod{p^2}$" (Proposition 3.3.1(2)), which is precisely the necessary and sufficient condition for graded independence. ### Application Examples #### Construction of Diagonal Bases (Theorem 4.2.7) If $K'/k'_0$ satisfies the theorem conditions and $k_0/k'_0$ is a tame ramified extension of degree $e \geq n-1 = p^2-1$, then the graded base automatically becomes a diagonal base. **Significance**: Diagonal bases allow direct computation of all associated orders $A_0(i,j)$ (see Remark 4.2.2(1)). ## Related Work ### Historical Development #### 1. Classical Theory of Associated Orders - **Leopoldt (1959)**: Pioneering work proving that when $k=\mathbb{Q}$ and $G$ is abelian, $O$ is a free module over $A(O)$ - **Since 1959**: Dozens of papers computing associated orders in various cases #### 2. Theory of Associated Galois Modules - **Bondarko (2000, 2002)**: Introduces isomorphism $\phi: K\otimes_k K \to K[G]$, develops fundamental theory - [Bon00]: Addresses local Leopoldt problem for abelian $p$-extensions - [Bon02]: Studies Galois structure of ideals, introduces semistable extensions - **Bondarko (2003)**: Establishes connection between associated Galois modules and formal group cohomology (Theorem 1.1.2 of this paper) #### 3. Concrete Computations in Wildly Ramified Cases - **Byott (1997a)**: Studies Galois structure of ideals in wildly ramified abelian $p$-extensions - **Byott (1997b)**: Computes associated orders for extensions from Lubin-Tate formal groups (mentioned in Remark 1.2.3 as one of few known non-free cases) ### Positioning of This Paper #### Progress Beyond [Bon02] 1. **More General Extensions**: Handles $G=(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})^2$, not just cyclic extensions 2. **New Theoretical Framework**: Introduces graded independence and diagonal bases concepts 3. **More Refined Computations**: Provides complete information on all $(σ_1-1)^i(σ_2-1)^j$ 4. **Relative Theory**: Develops theory of $A_i^0$, expanding applicability #### Distinction from Byott's Work - Byott primarily focuses on special Lubin-Tate extensions - This paper provides more general theory and methods - This paper's conditions (ramification jumps distinct modulo $p^2$) cover broader classes of extensions ### Technical Connections #### Core Tools Used 1. **Ramification Theory**: Classical theory from Serre's *Local Fields* 2. **Tensor Product Methods**: Originating from [Bon00, Bon02] 3. **Difference Polynomials**: Used to analyze action of $(X-1)^k$ #### Connections with Other Directions - **Formal Group Theory**: Related to Kummer theory through Theorem 1.1.2 - **Galois Module Structure**: Related to classical Galois module theory in global and local fields - **Representation Theory**: Module structure of $k[G]$ has deep connections with group representation theory ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. **Complete Resolution of $G=(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})^2$ Case**: Under the condition that ramification jumps are distinct modulo $p^2$, provides explicit bases for all associated Galois modules $A_i$ 2. **Establishment of Systematic Theory**: Concepts of graded independence and diagonal bases provide a unified framework for studying general wildly ramified extensions 3. **Development of Relative Theory**: Theory of $A_i^0$ generalizes results to more general settings, handling the difficult case where ramification jumps are equal modulo $p$ 4. **Algorithmic Framework**: Provides systematic method for computing all associated orders $A_0(i,j)$ ### Limitations #### 1. Restrictions on Extension Degree - Main results apply only to $n=p^2$ - For $n=p^m$ ($m>2$), Remark 3.3.3(2) indicates method is difficult to generalize: > "If all $n_s$ are powers of $p$ and $m>2$, it is difficult to obtain large graded-independent sets" #### 2. Requirements on Ramification Conditions - Theorem 3.3.2(2) requires $p \nmid h_2-h_1$ (i.e., ramification jumps distinct modulo $p^2$) - While Theorem 4.1.3 handles equal modulo $p$ case, it requires additional condition $0 < v_p(h_2-h_1) < w-1$ #### 3. Existence of Diagonal Bases Remark 4.2.8(2) frankly states: > "There may exist fully ramified Galois extensions for which no diagonal base exists (contrast with Proposition 4.1.2(II))" #### 4. Distance Between Theory and Computation - While algorithmic framework is provided, further computation is needed for specific associated orders $A(O)$ - In some cases (e.g., when ramification jumps are "too large" and $\text{char}\,k=0$), elements $(σ_1-1)^i(σ_2-1)^j$ may not be optimal ### Future Directions #### 1. Generalization to Higher Degree Extensions The paper suggests (Remark 3.3.3(2)): - Study composites of multiple linearly disjoint extensions $K_s/k$ - When $m=2$, $n_1 \geq n_2$, $c_1 \not\equiv c_2 \pmod{p}$, one can construct $(n+n_1)/2$ graded-independent elements - **Open Problem**: How to complete these elements to a graded base (unless $n_1=p$) #### 2. Deepening of Tame Lift Theory Theorem 4.2.7 gives conditions for tame lifts to produce diagonal bases: - Study more general lifts - Understand the essence of diagonality #### 3. Connections with Formal Group Theory - Deepen applications of Theorem 1.1.2 - Study extensions from special formal groups (e.g., Lubin-Tate formal groups) #### 4. Optimization of Computational Methods Remark 4.2.8(3) mentions: > "Stable extensions provide examples of $k$-diagonal bases with $|B_s^0| \leq 1$" - Find more extension classes with good properties - Develop more efficient computational algorithms #### 5. Non-abelian Case - Current results focus on abelian group $G=(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})^2$ - Investigate possibilities for non-abelian $p$-groups ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths #### 1. Theoretical Innovation - **Introduction of New Concepts**: Graded independence and diagonal bases are original concepts providing new tools for the field - **Systematic Theory**: Not only solves specific problems but establishes general framework - **Ingenuity of Methods**: The idea of reducing $p^2$-degree extensions to $p$-degree extensions through $K\otimes_k K$ is very elegant #### 2. Technical Depth - **Complete Computations**: Theorem 3.3.2 provides precise information on all $(σ_1-1)^i(σ_2-1)^j$ - **Multi-level Generalizations**: From basic cases to relative theory to diagonal bases, progressively deeper - **Rigor of Technical Details**: All proofs are careful, considering various boundary cases #### 3. Writing Quality - **Clear Structure**: Paper is well-organized, flowing logically from motivation to general theory to specific computations - **Sufficient Background**: §1.1 provides detailed review of history and motivation - **Value of Remarks**: Numerous remarks provide deep discussion and connections with other work #### 4. Practical Value - **Algorithmic Framework**: Provides practical method for computing associated orders (Remark 4.2.2) - **Generalizability**: Relative theory (§4.1) and tame lift theory (§4.2) expand applicability - **Connections with Other Theories**: Theorem 1.1.2 demonstrates applications in formal group cohomology ### Weaknesses #### 1. Limitations of Applicability - **Degree Restrictions**: Main results apply only to $n=p^2$; generalization to higher degrees is difficult - **Ramification Conditions**: Requires ramification jumps to satisfy specific conditions (distinct modulo $p^2$ or satisfying conditions of Theorem 4.1.3) - **Characteristic Restrictions**: Some results (e.g., $h=0$ case) appear only in characteristic 0 #### 2. Theoretical Completeness - **Existence of Diagonal Bases**: Unclear whether diagonal bases always exist, as noted in Remark 4.2.8(2) - **Optimality Issues**: Uncertain whether $(σ_1-1)^i(σ_2-1)^j$ are optimal choices in all cases - **General $p$-groups**: Does not address non-abelian $p$-group cases #### 3. Lack of Concrete Examples - Paper provides no numerical examples or specific field extension instances - While connections with semistable extensions exist (Remark 3.3.3(2)), detailed examples are lacking #### 4. Brevity of Some Proofs - Some proofs (e.g., Proposition 2.2.1) are marked as "obvious" or "easy" - While likely true for experts, this may be insufficiently friendly to non-specialists ### Impact Assessment #### 1. Contribution to the Field - **Filling Gaps**: First systematic computation in the case $G=(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})^2$ without freeness results - **Methodological Contribution**: Graded independence framework may be adopted by other researchers - **Theoretical Advancement**: Furthers development of Bondarko's earlier work #### 2. Potential Applications - **Arithmetic Geometry**: Applications in formal group theory through Theorem 1.1.2 - **Galois Representation Theory**: Structure of associated orders has deep connections with Galois representations - **Computational Algebraic Number Theory**: Provides practical computational tools #### 3. Limitations - **Highly Specialized**: Paper addresses very specific problems with relatively small audience - **Difficult Generalization**: As authors acknowledge, methods are difficult to directly generalize to higher degree cases - **Dependence**: Results depend on fairly strong technical assumptions ### Applicable Scenarios #### 1. Theoretical Research - Study Galois module structure of local fields - Analyze arithmetic properties of wildly ramified extensions - Develop Galois cohomology theory of formal groups #### 2. Concrete Computations - Compute associated orders of specific extensions - Verify freeness of Galois modules - Study Galois structure of ideals #### 3. Generalization Directions - Serve as starting point for studying more general $p$-group extensions - Develop theory for non-abelian cases - Explore connections with other number-theoretic objects ### Overall Assessment This is a high-quality pure mathematics paper making substantial contributions to the specialized field of associated Galois module theory. The paper's main strengths are: 1. Introduction of new theoretical framework (graded independence) 2. Complete resolution of computational problems for $G=(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})^2$ case 3. Technical rigor and depth Main limitations are relatively restricted applicability and difficulties in generalizing to more general cases. However, given the problem's difficulty and field's specialization, these limitations are understandable. For experts studying Galois theory of local fields and associated orders, this is an important reference. For broader number theory researchers, the paper's methods and ideas also provide valuable insights. ## Key References 1. **[Leo59]** Leopoldt, H.-W. (1959). Über die Hauptordnung der ganzen Elemente eines abelschen Zahlkörpers. *J. Reine Angew. Math.* 201, 119-149. - Pioneering work introducing associated orders 2. **[Bon00]** Bondarko, M.V. (2000). Local Leopoldt's problem for rings of integers in abelian p-extensions of complete discrete valuation fields. *Doc. Math.* 5, 657-693. - Introduces isomorphism $\phi: K\otimes_k K \to K[G]$ 3. **[Bon02]** Bondarko, M.V. (2002). Local Leopoldt's problem for ideals in p-extensions of complete discrete valuation fields. *Contemporary Mathematics*. - Direct foundation for this paper 4. **[Bon03]** Bondarko, M.V. (2003). Links between associated additive Galois modules and computation of H¹ for local formal group modules. *J. of Number Theory* 101, 74-104. - Contains Theorem 1.1.2 of this paper 5. **[Ser79]** Serre, J.-P. (1979). *Local fields*. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 67, Springer. - Classical reference for ramification theory 6. **[FeV02]** Fesenko, I.B., Vostokov, S.V. (2002). *Local Fields and their extensions*, second edition. AMS. - Modern textbook on local field theory 7. **[Byo97a,b]** Byott, N. (1997). Two relevant papers - Important computational results in wildly ramified cases