On j-Artinian Modules Over Commutative Rings

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2511.21543
• Title: On ȷ-Artinian Modules Over Commutative Rings
• Authors: Dilara Erdemir, Najib Mahdou, El Houssaine Oubouhou, Ünsal Tekir
• Classification: math.AC (Commutative Algebra)
• Submission Date: November 26, 2025 to arXiv
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21543

Abstract

This paper generalizes the concept of ȷ-Artinian rings to module theory by introducing the notion of ȷ-Artinian modules. For a module M over a commutative ring R and a submodule ȷ, a submodule N of M is called a ȷ-submodule if N ⊈ ȷ. M is called a ȷ-Artinian R-module if every descending chain of ȷ-submodules is stationary. The paper provides characterizations of ȷ-Artinian modules, establishes an analogue of the Akizuki theorem within this framework, and discusses generalizations to amalgamated structures.

Research Background and Motivation

Research Questions

The core problem addressed is the generalization of ȷ-Artinian ring theory to the module-theoretic framework, systematically investigating the properties, characterizations, and relationships between ȷ-Artinian modules and classical Artinian modules.

Significance

1. Theoretical Completeness: Artinian rings and modules are central objects in commutative algebra with over 100 years of research history. Establishing the module-theoretic version of ȷ-Artinian rings, as a genuine generalization of Artinian rings, is crucial for theoretical completeness.
2. Generalization of Classical Results: Emil Artin introduced ring theory satisfying the descending chain condition in 1927, which made significant contributions to the development of commutative ring structure theory. Generalizing these classical results to the ȷ-Artinian module framework has important theoretical significance.
3. Connecting Different Research Directions: The concepts of ȷ-Noetherian rings and modules have already been introduced and studied (Alhazmy et al. 1, Erdemir et al. 9). Research on ȷ-Artinian modules can establish a dual connection with ȷ-Noetherian theory.

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. Limited Research Scope: Although ȷ-Artinian rings have been studied by Ansari et al. 3, systematic generalization to the module-theoretic level remains underdeveloped.
2. Focus on Special Cases: Previous research has concentrated on special cases, such as when ȷ is the nil-radical (nonnil-Noetherian rings) or the Jacobson radical.
3. Lack of Unified Framework: A unified theoretical framework is needed to handle various properties and applications of ȷ-Artinian modules.

Research Motivation

Inspired by the concepts of ȷ-Artinian rings and ȷ-Noetherian modules, the authors naturally propose the concept of ȷ-Artinian modules, which is a genuine generalization of Artinian modules (the two coincide when ȷ = 0). This generalization not only has theoretical value but also provides new tools for studying broader classes of modules.

Core Contributions

The main contributions of this paper include:

1. Introduction of New Concept: Systematic definition and study of ȷ-Artinian modules for the first time, establishing the basic theoretical framework.
2. Equivalent Characterizations: Proof of three equivalent conditions for ȷ-Artinian modules (Theorem 2.1):
   • Every descending chain of ȷ-submodules is stationary
   • Every non-empty family of ȷ-submodules has a minimal element
   • Arbitrary intersections of ȷ-submodule families equal finite intersections
3. Akizuki Theorem Analogue: Proof that every cyclic ȷ-Artinian R-module is ȷ-Noetherian (Theorem 2.5).
4. Properties of Prime and Maximal Submodules:
   • Every ȷ-prime submodule of a ȷ-Artinian module is maximal (Proposition 2.7)
   • A ȷ-Artinian module has only finitely many maximal submodules (Proposition 2.8)
5. Quotient Module Properties: Establishment of relationships between ȷ-Artinian modules and Artinian properties of their quotient modules (Propositions 2.3, 2.4).
6. Localization Properties: Proof that ȷ-Artinian property is preserved under localization (Proposition 2.9).
7. Exact Sequence Properties: Conditions for transmission of ȷ-Artinian property in short exact sequences (Theorem 2.10).
8. Direct Sum Characterization: Complete characterization of when finite direct sums are ȷ-Artinian (Proposition 2.12).
9. Complete Characterization of Special Module Classes: For divisible finitely generated torsion-free modules, necessary and sufficient conditions for equivalence of ȷ-Artinian and Artinian properties (Theorem 2.14).
10. Generalization to Amalgamated Structures: Extension of ȷ-Artinian properties to amalgamated module structures (Theorem 2.24).

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Basic Definitions:

• Let R be a commutative ring with unity, M an R-module, and ȷ a submodule of M
• A submodule N of M is called a ȷ-submodule if N ⊈ ȷ
• M is called a ȷ-Artinian R-module if every descending chain of ȷ-submodules is stationary

Key Observations:

1. Every Artinian R-module is ȷ-Artinian, but the converse does not hold
2. If ȷ₀ ⊆ ȷ₁, then every ȷ₀-Artinian module is ȷ₁-Artinian
3. When ȷ = 0, ȷ-Artinian modules coincide with Artinian modules

Theoretical Architecture

1. Equivalent Characterization (Theorem 2.1)

The paper first establishes three equivalent conditions for ȷ-Artinian modules, which form the foundation of the entire theory:

(1) → (2) Proof Strategy: By contradiction. If there exists a family 𝒩 of ȷ-submodules with no minimal element, one can construct an infinite strictly descending chain N₁ ⊃ N₂ ⊃ N₃ ⊃ ..., a contradiction.

(2) → (3) Proof Strategy: Let W = ⋂ᵢ∈I Nᵢ and consider the set 𝒬 of all finite intersections. By (2), 𝒬 has a minimal element P = ⋂ᵢ∈K Nᵢ (K finite). By minimality of P, P ⊆ Nᵢ for all i ∈ I, hence P = W.

(3) → (1) Proof Strategy: For a descending chain N₁ ⊇ N₂ ⊇ ..., by (3) we have ⋂ᵢ∈ℕ Nᵢ = ⋂ᵗᵢ₌₁ Nᵢ = Nₜ, so Nₗ = Nₜ for all l ≥ t.

2. Artinian Property of Quotient Modules

Proposition 2.3: If M is ȷ-Artinian, then M/ȷ is an Artinian R-module.

Proof Core: Descending chains of non-zero submodules of M/ȷ correspond to descending chains of submodules of M containing ȷ but not contained in ȷ, which are all ȷ-submodules, hence the chains are stationary.

Proposition 2.4 Generalization: For any ȷ-submodule N, M/N is Artinian.

3. Akizuki Theorem Analogue (Theorem 2.5)

Theorem Statement: Every cyclic ȷ-Artinian R-module is ȷ-Noetherian.

Proof Strategy:

1. By Proposition 2.4, for each ȷ-submodule N, M/N is a cyclic Artinian R-module
2. Cyclic Artinian modules must be Noetherian
3. By 9, Theorem 2.1, this is equivalent to M being ȷ-Noetherian

This result is a generalization of the classical Akizuki theorem within the ȷ-framework.

4. Prime and Maximal Submodule Theory

Proposition 2.6: For a ȷ-prime submodule N of a ȷ-Artinian module M: N is prime ⟺ (N:M) is a maximal ideal.

Proof Key Points:

• (⇒): M/N is an Artinian prime module with minimal non-zero submodule L = R(a+N) ≅ R/Ann(a+N), where Ann(a+N) is a maximal ideal. By primeness, Ann(a+N) = (N:M).
• (⇐): By 5, Lemma 2.1-(i).

Proposition 2.7: Every ȷ-prime submodule of a ȷ-Artinian module is maximal.

Proof Idea: Let N be a ȷ-prime submodule with (N:M) maximal. For any N ⊊ K ⊆ M, we have (N:M) ⊊ (K:M), hence (K:M) = R, so K = M.

Proposition 2.8: A ȷ-Artinian module has only finitely many maximal submodules.

Proof in Two Cases:

• Case 1: Consider the set of finite intersections of all maximal ȷ-submodules. By Theorem 2.1(2), this set has a minimal element, yielding finitely many maximal ȷ-submodules.
• Case 2: If ȷ is not maximal, all maximal submodules are ȷ-submodules; if ȷ is maximal, there is at most one additional maximal submodule (namely ȷ itself).

Technical Innovation Points

1. Unified Theoretical Framework

The paper establishes a unified framework for handling ȷ-Artinian modules, which:

• Contains classical Artinian modules as a special case (ȷ = 0)
• Forms a dual relationship with ȷ-Noetherian module theory
• Generalizes the theory of ȷ-Artinian rings

2. Transitivity in Exact Sequences (Theorem 2.10)

For the short exact sequence 0 → M' →^f M →^g M'' → 0:

• Forward Transitivity: M is ȷ-Artinian ⟹ M' is f⁻¹(ȷ)-Artinian and M'' is g(ȷ)-Artinian
• Reverse Transitivity: Requires the additional condition ker(g) ⊆ ȷ

The innovation of this result lies in:

1. Clarifying the "image" and "preimage" relationships of ȷ in exact sequences
2. Providing necessary and sufficient conditions for reverse transitivity
3. Furnishing tools for studying complex module structures

3. Complete Characterization of Divisible Modules (Theorem 2.14)

For a divisible, finitely generated, torsion-free module M, if ȷ is a prime submodule with ȷ ⊆ T(M) (the torsion submodule), then: M is Artinian ⟺ M is ȷ-Artinian

Key Insight of the Proof:

• (⇐) direction: For any non-zero a ∈ R, consider the descending chain Ram ⊇ Ra²m ⊇ ...
• By ȷ-Artinian property and divisibility, there exists k such that Raᵏm = Raᵏ⁺¹m
• This forces a to be invertible, hence R is a field
• Finitely generated modules over fields are Artinian

This result deeply reveals that for special module classes, the ȷ-Artinian condition is actually equivalent to the Artinian condition.

4. Direct Sum Characterization (Proposition 2.12)

For M = ⊕ⁿᵢ₌₁ Mᵢ and ȷ = ⊕ⁿᵢ₌₁ ȷᵢ, the following are equivalent:

1. M is Artinian
2. M is ȷ-Artinian
3. Each Mᵢ is Artinian

This result shows that in the direct sum case, ȷ-Artinian property provides no new information, contrasting with the situation for individual modules.

5. Treatment of Amalgamated Structures (Theorem 2.24)

For ring homomorphism f: R → S and module homomorphism φ: M → N, the amalgamated module M ⋈_φ JN satisfies: M is ȷ-Artinian R⋈_f J-module ⟺ M ⋈_φ JN is ȷ⋈_φ JN-Artinian R⋈_f J-module

This result extends ȷ-Artinian properties to more complex algebraic structures.

Experimental Setup

As a pure mathematics theoretical paper, this work involves no experimental setup, datasets, or numerical experiments. All results are obtained through rigorous mathematical proofs. The "verification" of the paper is embodied in:

1. Logical Rigor: Every theorem has a complete proof
2. Example Verification: Reference to 3, Example 2.3 demonstrates that ȷ-Artinian modules are indeed genuine generalizations of Artinian modules
3. Theoretical Consistency: All results mutually support each other, forming a coherent theoretical system

Experimental Results

Summary of Main Theoretical Results

1. Basic Properties

• Theorem 2.1: Three equivalent characterizations of ȷ-Artinian modules
• Propositions 2.3, 2.4: Artinian properties of quotient modules
• Theorem 2.5: Akizuki theorem analogue

2. Structural Properties

• Propositions 2.6, 2.7: Relationships between prime and maximal submodules
• Proposition 2.8: Finiteness of maximal submodules
• Proposition 2.9: Localization properties

3. Exactness Properties

• Theorem 2.10: Transitivity in short exact sequences
• Corollary 2.11: Cases involving Noetherian submodules

4. Special Cases

• Theorem 2.14: Complete characterization of divisible modules
• Corollaries 2.15, 2.21: Equivalent conditions for Noetherian property
• Proposition 2.12: Characterization of direct sums

5. Advanced Structures

• Proposition 2.22: Cases of finite intersections of submodules
• Theorem 2.24: Properties of amalgamated modules

Key Findings

1. Genuine Generalization: ȷ-Artinian modules are indeed genuine generalizations of Artinian modules, with examples of ȷ-Artinian but non-Artinian modules existing.
2. Duality: ȷ-Artinian modules and ȷ-Noetherian modules exhibit a certain duality (e.g., Theorem 2.5).
3. Finiteness: ȷ-Artinian modules inherit many finiteness properties of Artinian modules (e.g., finiteness of maximal submodules).
4. Condition Sensitivity: Deriving Artinian property from ȷ-Artinian requires additional conditions (e.g., divisibility and finite generation in Theorem 2.14).
5. Structure Preservation: ȷ-Artinian property is preserved under certain constructions (localization, amalgamation) but degenerates to Artinian property in finite direct sums.

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Classical Theory of Artinian Rings and Modules

• Artin (1927) 4: Introduction of Artinian rings, laying the foundation for descending chain condition theory
• Classical Results: Artinian rings are Noetherian, Artinian rings have finitely many prime ideals, etc.

2. Generalizations of Noetherian Theory

• Badawi (2003) 6: Introduction of nonnil-Noetherian rings (special case where ȷ is the nil-radical)
• Hizem and Benhissi (2011) 10: Study of nonnil-Noetherian rings and SFT property
• Dabbabi and Benhissi (2024) 7: Study of non-J-Noetherian rings (special case where ȷ is the Jacobson radical)
• Alhazmy et al. (2024) 1: Systematic study of ȷ-Noetherian rings, establishing Cohen-type theorems and flat extensions

3. ȷ-Noetherian Modules

• Erdemir et al. (2025) 9: Introduction of ȷ-Noetherian modules, providing Cohen-type theorems and Hilbert basis theorem
• Yousefian Darani (2016) 16: Study of nonnil-Noetherian modules over commutative rings

4. ȷ-Artinian Rings

• Ansari, Maurya and Oubouhou (2025) 3: Introduction of ȷ-Artinian rings, proving that ȷ-Artinian rings are ȷ-Noetherian, prime ȷ-ideals are maximal, etc.

5. Related Module-Theoretic Concepts

• Prime Submodules and Secondary Modules: Khaksari (2016) 12 studies Artinian prime modules
• Multiplication and Divisible Modules: Ali (2008) 2, Matlis (1960) 13
• Semisimple and Virtually Maximal Submodules: McCasland and Smith (1993) 14

Relationship Between This Work and Related Work

1. Direct Generalization: This paper is a natural generalization and synthesis of 3 (ȷ-Artinian rings) and 9 (ȷ-Noetherian modules).
2. Dual Relationship: This work forms a dual with 9, one studying ascending chain conditions and the other descending chain conditions.
3. Unified Framework: This paper provides a unified framework encompassing special cases studied in 6, 7, 10.

Advantages of This Work

1. Systematicity: First systematic establishment of a complete theoretical framework for ȷ-Artinian modules
2. Depth: Not only provides basic definitions but establishes profound structural results
3. Breadth: Covers exact sequences, localization, direct sums, amalgamated structures, and more
4. Innovation: Establishes new results such as Akizuki theorem analogue and characterization of divisible modules

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical Framework Established: Successfully establishes a complete theoretical system for ȷ-Artinian modules, including equivalent characterizations, basic properties, and structure theorems.
2. Akizuki Theorem Generalized: Proves that cyclic ȷ-Artinian modules are ȷ-Noetherian, a meaningful generalization of the classical result.
3. Prime Submodule Theory: Establishes prime and maximal submodule theory for ȷ-Artinian modules, proving that ȷ-prime submodules are maximal and there are only finitely many maximal submodules.
4. Complete Characterization of Special Module Classes: For divisible finitely generated torsion-free modules, completely characterizes when ȷ-Artinian is equivalent to Artinian.
5. Structure Preservation: Proves that ȷ-Artinian property is preserved under localization, exact sequences (under appropriate conditions), and amalgamated structures.
6. Direct Sum Degeneration: Reveals that in finite direct sum cases, ȷ-Artinian property degenerates to Artinian property.

Limitations

1. Theoretical Nature: The paper is entirely theoretical with no concrete computational examples or application instances.
2. Sufficient Conditions: Some results (such as the reverse direction of Theorem 2.10, Theorem 2.14) require additional technical conditions that may be restrictive in practical applications.
3. Direct Sum Case: Proposition 2.12 shows that ȷ-Artinian provides no new information in direct sum cases, limiting the application value of the theory in certain structures.
4. Constructive Methods: The paper primarily proves existence results, lacking constructive methods to determine whether a specific module is ȷ-Artinian.
5. Computational Complexity: The paper does not discuss algorithmic complexity or decidability issues for verifying ȷ-Artinian property.
6. Application Scope: The paper does not explicitly indicate specific applications of ȷ-Artinian modules in algebraic geometry, representation theory, or other fields.

Future Directions

Although the paper does not explicitly list future research directions, the following potential directions can be inferred from the content:

1. Polynomial and Power Series Rings: Similar to 9's study of ȷ-Noetherian modules, one could investigate properties of ȷ-Artinian modules under polynomial ring and power series ring extensions.
2. Flat and Faithfully Flat Extensions: Study the behavior of ȷ-Artinian property under various ring extensions.
3. Homological Properties: Investigate homological dimension, Ext and Tor functors of ȷ-Artinian modules.
4. Categorical Perspective: Study ȷ-Artinian modules from a categorical viewpoint, such as injective envelopes and projective covers.
5. Concrete Examples: Construct more non-trivial examples of ȷ-Artinian but non-Artinian modules.
6. Application Research: Explore applications of ȷ-Artinian modules in algebraic geometry (such as sheaf theory), representation theory, or other fields.
7. Computational Methods: Develop algorithms for determining and computing properties of ȷ-Artinian modules.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation

• Naturalness of Concept: ȷ-Artinian modules are a natural generalization of Artinian modules with concise and elegant definitions
• Systematicity: The paper establishes a complete theoretical system rather than a mere collection of isolated results
• Depth: Establishes profound structural results beyond basic definitions (such as Akizuki theorem and characterization of divisible modules)

2. Proof Techniques

• Rigor: All proofs are logically rigorous with clear steps
• Sophistication: Multiple proofs employ clever techniques, such as the argument in Theorem 2.14 utilizing divisibility and torsion-freeness
• Completeness: The cyclic proof of three equivalent conditions in Theorem 2.1 demonstrates mathematical maturity

3. Structural Organization

• Logical Clarity: Progresses from basic definitions to advanced results in a layered manner
• Self-Consistency: Various results mutually support each other, forming an organic whole
• Broad Coverage: Encompasses quotient modules, exact sequences, localization, direct sums, amalgamated structures, and more

4. Connection with Existing Work

• Inheritance: Well inherits and generalizes theory of ȷ-Artinian rings and ȷ-Noetherian modules
• Duality: Forms elegant duality with ȷ-Noetherian module theory
• Unification: Provides unified framework for handling special cases previously studied in 6, 7, 10

Weaknesses

1. Lack of Concrete Examples

• Only references 3, Example 2.3 without providing self-constructed detailed examples
• Lacks computational examples demonstrating theoretical applications
• No counterexamples illustrating necessity of certain conditions

2. Weak Application Aspects

• Entirely theoretical research without indicating specific application domains
• No discussion of connections with algebraic geometry, representation theory, or other fields
• Lacks motivating application background

3. Limitations of Some Results

• Conditions in Theorem 2.14 are restrictive (divisible, finitely generated, torsion-free, ȷ prime with ȷ ⊆ T(M))
• Proposition 2.12 shows theory degenerates in direct sum cases
• Some proofs rely on citations rather than being self-contained (e.g., (⇐) direction of Proposition 2.6)

4. Technical Details

• Treatment of Remarks 2.13 and 2.23 appears somewhat rushed
• Some proofs could be more detailed (e.g., reverse direction of Theorem 2.10)
• Lacks diagrams to aid understanding of complex structures

5. Computational and Algorithmic Aspects

• No discussion of algorithms for determining ȷ-Artinian property
• No treatment of computational complexity
• Lacks constructive methods

Impact

1. Contribution to the Field

• Filling Gaps: First systematic study of ȷ-Artinian modules, filling theoretical gaps
• Theoretical Completion: Forms complete dual system with ȷ-Noetherian module theory
• Classical Generalization: Generalizes Akizuki and other classical results to new framework

2. Practical Value

• Theoretical Tools: Provides new tools for studying broader module classes
• Unified Framework: Can be used to revisit and unify previous special case studies
• Potential Applications: Although not explicitly indicated, theory may have applications in algebraic geometry and representation theory

3. Reproducibility

• Mathematical Proofs: As a pure mathematics paper, all results can be verified through logical reasoning
• Clear Citations: References to existing results are accurate and clear
• Precise Definitions: All concepts are precisely defined, facilitating subsequent research

4. Expected Impact

• Short-term: Will attract attention from commutative algebra researchers, particularly those studying ȷ-theory
• Medium-term: May inspire further research on ȷ-modules, such as ȷ-injective modules, ȷ-projective modules, etc.
• Long-term: May become standard content in module theory textbooks

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research

• Theoretical research in commutative algebra
• Structure theory of modules
• Research on generalizations of descending chain conditions

2. Special Case Analysis

• When studying "almost Artinian" modules
• When a particular submodule ȷ plays a special role (such as nil-radical, Jacobson radical)
• When studying Artinian properties of localized or quotient modules

3. Related Fields

• Sheaf theory in algebraic geometry (though not explicitly indicated in the paper)
• Module categories in representation theory
• Derived functors in homological algebra

4. Inapplicable Scenarios

• Situations requiring concrete calculations (paper lacks algorithms)
• Infinite direct sum cases (theory primarily handles finite cases)
• Non-commutative ring cases (paper restricts to commutative rings)

References

The paper cites 16 references, primarily including:

Core Related Work:

• 1 Alhazmy et al. (2024): ȷ-Noetherian rings
• 3 Ansari et al. (2025): ȷ-Artinian rings
• 9 Erdemir et al. (2025): ȷ-Noetherian modules

Classical Literature:

• 4 Artin (1927): Foundational work on Artinian rings
• 15 Wang and Kim (2016): Fundamentals of commutative rings and their modules

Special Cases:

• 6 Badawi (2003): nonnil-Noetherian rings
• 7 Dabbabi and Benhissi (2024): non-J-Noetherian rings
• 10 Hizem and Benhissi (2011): nonnil-Noetherian rings and SFT property

Technical Tools:

• 8 El Khalfaoui et al. (2021): Amalgamated modules
• 11 Kasch (1982): Classical textbook on modules and rings
• 12 Khaksari (2016): Artinian prime modules

Summary

This is a high-quality pure mathematics theoretical paper that successfully generalizes the concept of ȷ-Artinian rings to the module-theoretic framework, establishing a systematic and complete theoretical system. The paper's main strengths lie in the systematicity of the theory, rigor of proofs, and good connection with existing work. Main weaknesses include lack of concrete examples, weak application aspects, and restrictive technical conditions in some results.

From an academic value perspective, this is an important theoretical contribution that fills a significant gap in ȷ-module theory and forms a complete dual with ȷ-Noetherian module theory. Results such as the Akizuki theorem analogue, prime submodule theory, and characterization of divisible modules all possess independent theoretical value.

For subsequent researchers, this paper provides a solid theoretical foundation upon which to investigate polynomial ring extensions, homological properties, concrete applications, and other directions. For learners, this paper exemplifies how to systematically establish a new mathematical theory, serving as an excellent learning resource.