Thermomechanical Model of Solar Cells

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2511.21554
• Title: Thermomechanical model of solar cells
• Author: Tom Markvart (Czech Technical University in Prague & University of Southampton)
• Classification: physics.app-ph (Applied Physics)
• Submission Date: November 26, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21554

Abstract

This paper proposes modeling solar cells as mechanical open-cycle thermodynamic engines, wherein chemical potential is generated during an isochoric process corresponding to the thermalization of electron-hole pairs. Under one-sun illumination, beam expansion and current generation are described as isothermal loss work. More broadly, the voltage generated in an open-cycle process corresponds to availability (exergy), leading to a correction to the Shockley-Queisser detailed balance limit.

Research Background and Motivation

Research Problem

The core problem addressed in this paper is: How can the photovoltaic conversion process in solar cells be reunderstood from a thermodynamic perspective, particularly by drawing an analogy to classical thermodynamic heat engines?

Problem Significance

1. Theoretical Completeness: Traditional solar cell models are primarily based on electronic theory, while a thermodynamic perspective can provide deeper physical understanding
2. Understanding Efficiency Limits: The Shockley-Queisser detailed balance limit is a fundamental theoretical constraint in photovoltaics, but its thermodynamic nature has not been fully elucidated
3. Energy Loss Mechanisms: Thermodynamic analysis can clarify the physical nature of various energy losses more systematically

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. The traditional Shockley-Queisser model treats photon flux as particle flow, lacking systematic thermodynamic description
2. Existing thermodynamic treatments typically model solar cells as closed-cycle heat engines, which contradicts the actual open-system characteristics
3. The role of the "availability" (exergy) concept in photovoltaic conversion is insufficiently understood

Research Motivation

The author attempts to construct a complete thermodynamic-mechanical analogy model by establishing correspondence between photon number density and photon flux density, as well as between volume and optical étendue, thereby revealing the thermodynamic essence of photovoltaic conversion.

Core Contributions

1. Established the concept of "thermodynamic photons": By defining the "volume" of a photon as v = (c/4π)(E/Ψ), optical parameters are mapped to thermodynamic parameter space
2. Proposed p-v diagram description of photovoltaic conversion: The photovoltaic conversion process is decomposed into:
   • Isochoric process (thermalization): generating chemical potential
   • Isothermal expansion process: generating mechanical work or loss work
3. Quantified isothermal losses:
   • Beam expansion loss under one-sun illumination: k_B T_o ln(π/ω_S) ≈ 300 meV
   • Current generation loss: equivalent to traditional solar cell equations
4. Proposed correction to the Shockley-Queisser limit: Introduced "availability correction" of approximately 26 mV, reducing the efficiency limit by about 1% (absolute value)
5. Clarified the distinction between open-cycle and closed-cycle heat engines: Demonstrated the unique properties of solar cells as open-cycle engines

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

The research task is to establish a thermodynamic-mechanical model of the photovoltaic conversion process in solar cells, specifically including:

• Input: Solar radiation (temperature T_S, photon flux density Φ_Eg(T_S))
• Output: Voltage and current (V, J)
• Constraints: Quasi-blackbody radiation assumption, photons with energy greater than bandgap E_g

Theoretical Framework

1. Definition of Thermodynamic Photons

The author first establishes the relationship between photon number N and photon flux Ψ:

$\Psi = \frac{c}{4\pi}E\frac{N}{V}$

where E is the optical étendue and V is volume. From this, the volume of a single "thermodynamic photon" is defined as:

$v = \frac{V}{N} = \frac{c}{4\pi}\frac{E}{\Psi}$

For a solar cell at temperature T emitting into a hemispherical space (étendue πA), the single-photon volume is:

$v = \frac{c}{4\Phi_{E_g}(T)}$

where the photon flux density is:

$\Phi_{E_g}(T) = \frac{2\pi}{h^3c^2}\int_{E_g}^{\infty}\frac{E^2}{e^{E/k_BT}-1}dE$

2. Thermodynamic Description of Chemical Potential

By analogy with the classical first law of thermodynamics, for a single photon:

$du = Tds - pdv$

Introducing chemical potential:

$\mu = u - Ts$

The differential form of chemical potential:

$d\mu = -sdT - pdv$

Chemical potential represents the portion of energy that can be extracted to do useful work or generate voltage.

3. Isochoric Thermalization Process (Process AB)

Under maximum concentration conditions, incident and emitted beams have the same étendue πA, so the conversion process occurs at constant volume v_S. This is an isochoric process corresponding to electron-hole pair thermalization.

Cooling from solar temperature T_S to ambient temperature T_o, the increase in chemical potential is:

$\mu_{max} = \int_{T_o}^{T_S}s(v_s,T)dT$

Assuming photons obey the ideal gas law pv = k_B T, we obtain:

$\mu_{max} = k_BT_o\ln\left(\frac{v_o}{v_S}\right) = k_BT_o\ln\left\{\frac{\Phi_{E_g}(T_S)}{\Phi_{E_g}(T_o)}\right\} = qV_{oc}^{max}$

This is precisely the Shockley-Queisser open-circuit voltage under maximum concentration conditions.

4. Isothermal Losses

Loss 1: Beam Expansion under One-Sun Illumination (Process AD)

From maximum concentration (étendue ω_S A) to hemispherical emission (étendue πA), the photon gas undergoes isothermal expansion, with volume increasing from v_S to v_1 = v_S(π/ω_S). The loss work is:

$w_{loss}^{(1)} = \int_{v_S}^{v_1}pdv = k_BT_o\ln\left(\frac{\pi}{\omega_S}\right)$

This is equivalent to the loss work of gas free expansion into vacuum.

Loss 2: Current Generation (Process DE)

Current density J generation reduces the emitted photon flux density from (ω_S/π)Φ_Eg(T_S) to (ω_S/π)Φ_Eg(T_S) - J/q, corresponding to volume increase. The loss work is:

$w_{loss}^{(2)} = k_BT_o\ln\left(\frac{J_\ell + J_o}{J_\ell + J_o - J}\right)$

where:

• $J_\ell = (\omega_S/\pi)\Phi_{E_g}(T_S) - \Phi_{E_g}(T_o)$ is the photocurrent density
• $J_o = \Phi_{E_g}(T_o)$ is the dark saturation current density

Technical Innovations

1. Volume-Étendue Correspondence: Innovatively maps optical étendue to thermodynamic volume, enabling description of photovoltaic conversion on a p-v diagram
2. Chemical Potential-Voltage Equivalence: Clearly establishes the correspondence between chemical potential and voltage, converting electrical quantities to thermodynamic quantities
3. Process Decomposition:
   • Isochoric process (no mechanical work) → chemical potential generation
   • Isothermal process (volume change) → loss work
4. Open-Cycle Perspective: Emphasizes that solar cells are open-cycle engines, where photons serve as both fuel and working fluid
5. Availability Correction: Points out the need to subtract work done by external medium p_o(v_o - v_S), leading to approximately 26 mV voltage correction

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Method

This is purely theoretical work without experimental data. Verification methods include:

1. Self-Consistency Check: The derived voltage-current relationship should be consistent with known solar cell equations
2. Limiting Case Verification:
   • Under maximum concentration conditions, should obtain Shockley-Queisser open-circuit voltage
   • Under one-sun illumination, should include additional loss terms
3. Numerical Estimation: Calculate the numerical magnitude of availability correction

Parameter Settings

• Solar temperature: T_S ≈ 6000 K
• Ambient temperature: T_o ≈ 300 K
• Solar solid angle: ω_S ≈ 6.8×10⁻⁵ sr
• Hemispherical solid angle: π sr

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Derivation of Voltage-Current Relationship

Combining chemical potential generation and two isothermal losses, we obtain:

$qV_{oc} = qV_{oc}^{max} - k_BT_o\ln\left(\frac{\pi}{\omega_S}\right)$

$qV = qV_{oc} - k_BT_o\ln\left(\frac{J_\ell + J_o}{J_\ell + J_o - J}\right)$

Simplifying yields the standard solar cell equation:

$J = J_\ell - J_o(e^{qV/k_BT_o} - 1)$

Verification Result: Completely equivalent to the Shockley-Queisser detailed balance model, confirming the self-consistency of the thermodynamic-mechanical model.

2. Loss Quantification

One-Sun Illumination Loss: $w_{loss}^{(1)} = k_BT_o\ln\left(\frac{\pi}{\omega_S}\right) \approx 26\text{ meV} \times \ln(46200) \approx 300\text{ meV}$

This explains why efficiency under one-sun illumination is far lower than under maximum concentration.

3. Availability Correction

Open-cycle engines must subtract work done by external medium, corresponding to voltage correction:

$\Delta V \approx \frac{k_BT_o}{q} \approx 26\text{ mV}$

This reduces the Shockley-Queisser efficiency limit by approximately 1% absolute value (e.g., from 33% to 32%).

Physical Picture Analysis

Through p-v diagrams (Figures 1 and 2), the author clearly demonstrates:

1. Point A (Initial State): Solar temperature T_S, chemical potential = 0 (blackbody radiation)
2. Point B (After Thermalization): Ambient temperature T_o, high density, chemical potential μ_max
3. Point C (Complete Equilibrium): Ambient temperature T_o, low density, chemical potential = 0
4. Point D (One-Sun Illumination): State after beam expansion
5. Point E (Current Generation): State after photon absorption and current generation

Comparison with Classical Heat Engines

Using a steam turbine as example (Figure 3), the author illustrates:

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Muser (1957): Earliest thermodynamic treatment of semiconductor electronic processes
2. Trivich & Flinn (1955): Proposed approximate formula for solar conversion efficiency
3. Shockley & Queisser (1961): Established detailed balance limit, but did not systematically elucidate thermodynamic nature
4. Petela (1964) & Landsberg (1976): Studied exergy of thermal radiation and effective temperature
5. Markvart (2007-2025): Series of works establishing thermodynamic theory of photovoltaic conversion

Unique Contributions of This Paper

Compared to existing work, this paper's innovations include:

1. Mechanical Analogy: First systematic use of p-v diagrams and mechanical work concepts to describe photovoltaic conversion
2. Open-Cycle Perspective: Clearly distinguishes differences between open-cycle and closed-cycle heat engines
3. Loss Decomposition: Clearly decomposes losses into isothermal processes representable on p-v diagrams
4. Availability Correction: Quantitatively calculates efficiency correction due to open-cycle characteristics

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Equivalence Proof: The thermodynamic-mechanical model is completely equivalent to the Shockley-Queisser detailed balance model
2. Physical Picture:
   • Thermalization is an isochoric process generating chemical potential (voltage)
   • Beam expansion and current generation are isothermal loss processes
3. Open-Cycle Characteristics: Solar cells as open-cycle engines require consideration of availability correction
4. Efficiency Correction: Availability correction reduces the Shockley-Queisser limit by approximately 1% absolute value

Limitations

1. Idealized Assumptions:
   • Assumes quasi-blackbody radiation
   • Assumes photon ideal gas behavior
   • Neglects many non-ideal factors in actual devices
2. Scope of Applicability:
   • Primarily applicable to single-junction solar cells
   • Requires extension for multi-junction, hot-carrier, and other advanced concepts
3. Practical Significance of Availability Correction:
   • 26 mV correction is relatively small
   • May be masked by other losses in actual devices
4. Limitations of p-v Diagrams:
   • Authors acknowledge p-v diagrams are not to scale (pressure and volume vary by several orders of magnitude)
   • Primarily illustrative rather than quantitative

Future Directions

Directions suggested by the paper:

1. Extension to Other Photovoltaic Concepts: Hot-carrier, intermediate band, etc.
2. Analogy with Other Renewable Energy: Wind, tidal energy are also open-cycle systems
3. More Precise Availability Calculations: Considering actual device structures
4. Experimental Verification: Design experiments to measure availability correction effects

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Conceptual Innovation (★★★★★)

• Mapping optical étendue to thermodynamic volume is a very clever innovation
• "Thermodynamic photon" concept provides clear physical picture of photon gas
• Open-cycle perspective breaks through limitations of traditional heat engine models

2. Theoretical Rigor (★★★★☆)

• Mathematical derivations are rigorous, starting from fundamental thermodynamic principles
• Results completely consistent with known Shockley-Queisser model, proving self-consistency
• Physical picture is clear, each loss term has explicit thermodynamic interpretation

3. Physical Insight (★★★★★)

• Reveals thermodynamic essence of photovoltaic conversion
• Clarifies physical mechanisms of various losses
• Unifies optical, electrical, and thermodynamic descriptions

4. Clarity of Expression (★★★★☆)

• Paper structure is clear with rigorous logic
• p-v diagrams intuitively display conversion process
• Analogy with steam turbine aids understanding

Shortcomings

1. Limited Practical Value (★★☆☆☆)

• Pure theoretical work without new predictions or experimental verification
• Availability correction (26 mV) is relatively small with limited practical significance
• Provides no direct guidance for solar cell design

2. High Degree of Idealization (★★★☆☆)

• Quasi-blackbody radiation assumption not fully valid in practice
• Neglects carrier transport, surface recombination, and other actual effects
• Ideal gas assumption may be inaccurate for high-density photon gas

3. Insufficient Quantitative Analysis (★★★☆☆)

• p-v diagrams are only illustrative, lacking precise numerical calculations
• Lacks quantitative comparisons across different materials and conditions
• Availability correction calculation is somewhat rough

4. Absence of Experimental Verification (★★☆☆☆)

• No new testable predictions proposed
• Lacks comparison with experimental data
• Unclear whether 26 mV correction is measurable

Impact Assessment

Contribution to the Field (★★★★☆)

• Theoretical Significance: Provides new theoretical perspective on photovoltaic conversion, enriching thermodynamic theory framework
• Educational Value: Clear physical picture aids understanding of photovoltaic conversion essence
• Inspirational Value: May inspire thermodynamic analysis of other renewable energy systems

Practical Value (★★☆☆☆)

• Limited direct assistance for actual solar cell design
• 1% efficiency correction not primary concern at current technology level
• Important for understanding efficiency limits

Reproducibility (★★★★★)

• Theoretical derivations completely reproducible
• All formulas and calculations given explicit expressions
• No parts requiring experimental verification

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research:
   • Fundamental theoretical research on photovoltaic conversion
   • Discussion of thermodynamic limits
   • Theoretical analysis of novel solar cell concepts
2. Educational Applications:
   • Supplementary material for photovoltaic physics courses
   • Cross-disciplinary teaching of thermodynamics and optics
   • Helping students understand essence of energy conversion
3. Related Fields:
   • Other optoelectronic conversion devices (LEDs, lasers, etc.)
   • Thermodynamic analysis of renewable energy systems
   • Research on open-cycle thermodynamic systems
4. Not Applicable To:
   • Engineering design of actual solar cells
   • Technical development for short-term efficiency improvements
   • Problems requiring consideration of specific device structures

Overall Evaluation

This is a conceptually strong theoretical physics paper whose value lies primarily in providing a new perspective for understanding photovoltaic conversion rather than practical technological breakthroughs.

Core Value:

1. Establishes profound connection between photovoltaic conversion and classical thermodynamics
2. Reveals thermodynamic essence of various energy losses
3. Clarifies unique properties of open-cycle engines

Main Contributions:

• Theoretical Innovation: ★★★★★
• Practical Value: ★★☆☆☆
• Academic Impact: ★★★★☆

Recommended For:

• Theoretical photovoltaic physics researchers
• Thermodynamics and statistical physics scholars
• Graduate students interested in fundamental energy conversion theory

Not Recommended For:

• Engineers seeking practical technological breakthroughs
• Industry professionals needing immediate applicable results

References

The paper cites the following key references:

1. Shockley & Queisser (1961): Original paper on detailed balance limit
2. Landsberg & Mallinson (1976): Thermodynamic constraints and effective temperature
3. Petela (1964): Exergy of thermal radiation
4. Markvart series (2007-2025): Author's own series of research on photovoltaic thermodynamics
5. Pippard (1964): Classical thermodynamics textbook, standard reference on availability

These references form the foundational framework of photovoltaic thermodynamic theory.

Summary: This is an excellent theoretical physics paper that, through clever analogy and rigorous derivation, provides a new thermodynamic perspective for understanding solar cells. While practical value is limited, its theoretical insight and educational value are noteworthy. For theoretical researchers and students, this is a paper well worth careful study.